Databases · head to head
Grist vs Immuta

Immuta
Databases
Attribute-based access control and masking applied inside Snowflake, Databricks and BigQuery
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Grist has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Grist business plan has minimum 5-user requirement; Immuta contracts commonly start around one hundred to two hundred thousand US dollars a year for mid-market deployments and exceed five hundred thousand at enterprise scale, which excludes most data teams without a regulatory mandate.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Grist and Immuta actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Grist
Nothing recorded that Immuta does not also cover.
Only in Immuta
- Attribute-based policy
- Native enforcement
- Dynamic masking
- Row-level filtering
- Purpose-based access
- Sensitive data tagging
- Audit logging
- Multi-platform
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Grist
- Collaborative data and spreadsheet managementnot Immuta
- Database creation and automationnot Immuta
- Team data analysis and reportingnot Immuta
Immuta
- A bank whose Snowflake estate has grown to tens of thousands of roles that no one can review before an auditnot Grist
- A healthcare analytics team that must let researchers query patient data with identifiers masked unless a specific purpose is recordednot Grist
- A multinational applying different residency and access rules per jurisdiction to the same tables without duplicating datasetsnot Grist
- An organisation running both Snowflake and Databricks that wants one policy set rather than two divergent implementationsnot Grist
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Grist
- Business plan has minimum 5-user requirement
- Enterprise self-hosted pricing not disclosed publicly
- Annual billing discount only 20%, lower than some competitors
Immuta
- Contracts commonly start around one hundred to two hundred thousand US dollars a year for mid-market deployments and exceed five hundred thousand at enterprise scale, which excludes most data teams without a regulatory mandate.
- Policy is only as good as the data classification underneath it, so an organisation with poorly tagged columns will spend months on classification before Immuta enforces anything useful.
- Native enforcement means capability varies by platform, and a feature available on Snowflake may be absent or behave differently on BigQuery, which undermines the promise of one policy set everywhere.
- Adding an access governance layer creates a new dependency in the path to data: a misconfigured policy silently returns fewer rows rather than erroring, and analysts can act on incomplete results without noticing.
- It governs cloud data platforms, so personal data in operational databases, files and SaaS applications sits outside its scope and needs separate controls, meaning Immuta is rarely the whole answer.
Pricing, plan by plan
Grist
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited documents
- Up to 5,000 records per document
- 30-day snapshot history
- Pro$10/month
- Up to 100,000 records per document
- 3-year snapshot history
- 100+ AI credits monthly
- Business$30/month
- 150,000 records per document
- 5-year snapshot history
- 2,000 AI credits monthly
Immuta
On request- Immuta Platform$undefined/year
- Attribute-based policy authoring
- Native enforcement in supported data platforms
- Dynamic masking and row-level security
Which should you pick?
Choose Immuta if
- You need attribute-based policy.
- You work on Web, API, Cloud.
- You also want native enforcement.
Questions people ask
- Is Grist or Immuta better?
- Neither clearly leads. Grist starts at Free and Immuta at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Grist or Immuta?
- Grist has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Grist and On request for Immuta.
- Does Grist or Immuta run on more platforms?
- Grist runs on Web. Immuta runs on Web, API, Cloud.
- Can I use Grist for free?
- Yes. Grist has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Immuta starts at On request.
- What is Grist best used for?
- Grist is most often used for collaborative data and spreadsheet management, database creation and automation, team data analysis and reporting. Of those, collaborative data and spreadsheet management and database creation and automation are not what Immuta is typically brought in for.
- What can Grist do that Immuta cannot?
- Immuta covers Attribute-based policy, Native enforcement, Dynamic masking, Row-level filtering.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Grist: Does Grist have a free version?
Yes. Grist Free includes unlimited documents with up to 5,000 records each, 30-day snapshot history, and 100 AI Assistant credits. No credit card required.
SourceImmuta: Does Immuta sit in the query path?
No. It compiles policies into the data platform's own native controls, so queries run at normal speed through your existing tools.
Grist: How much does Grist Pro cost?
Grist Pro is $10/user/month (billed monthly) or $8/user/month with annual billing. It includes up to 100,000 records per document and 3-year snapshot history.
SourceImmuta: What does it cost?
Not published. Market data suggests roughly 100,000 to 200,000 US dollars a year for mid-market deployments and considerably more at enterprise scale.
Grist: What does Grist's Business plan include?
Grist Business is $30/user/month ($24 annually) with a minimum of 5 users. It includes 150,000 records per document, 5-year snapshot history, 2,000 AI credits monthly, and automations with priority support.
SourceImmuta: Is Immuta still independent?
Yes. It remains independently owned, unlike several competitors in data access governance that have been acquired.
Grist: Do nonprofits get discounts on Grist?
Yes. Nonprofits receive a 50% discount on the Pro plan with Letter of Determination verification.
SourceImmuta: Does it work across more than one warehouse?
Yes, one policy set can target Snowflake, Databricks, BigQuery and Starburst, though enforcement capability varies by platform.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Grist vs Airtable
- Grist vs PostgreSQL
- Grist vs Amazon Aurora
- Grist vs Cockroach Labs
- Grist vs FaunaDB
- Grist vs MariaDB
- Grist vs DataGrip
- Grist vs Estuary
- Grist vs Google Cloud SQL
- Grist vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Grist vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Grist vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Grist vs Timeplus
- Grist vs turbopuffer
- Grist vs VerneMQ
- Grist vs Vespa
- Grist vs Xata
- Grist vs Amazon RDS
- Grist vs Privacera
- Grist vs BigQuery
- Grist vs Teradata
- Grist vs Dgraph
- Grist vs Knack
- Grist vs Elasticsearch
- Grist vs Apache Druid
- Grist vs DuckDB
- Grist vs DynamoDB
- Grist vs Oracle Database
- Grist vs CosmosDB
- Grist vs DataStax
- Grist vs dbt
- Grist vs EMQX
- Grist vs Cassandra
- Grist vs Amazon Redshift
- Immuta vs Airtable
- Immuta vs PostgreSQL
- Immuta vs Amazon Aurora
- Immuta vs Cockroach Labs
- Immuta vs FaunaDB
- Immuta vs MariaDB
- Immuta vs DataGrip
- Immuta vs Estuary
- Immuta vs Google Cloud SQL
- Immuta vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Immuta vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Immuta vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Immuta vs Timeplus
- Immuta vs turbopuffer
- Immuta vs VerneMQ
- Immuta vs Vespa
- Immuta vs Xata
- Immuta vs Amazon RDS
- Immuta vs Privacera
- Immuta vs BigQuery
- Immuta vs Teradata
- Immuta vs Dgraph
- Immuta vs Knack
- Immuta vs Elasticsearch
- Immuta vs Apache Druid
- Immuta vs DuckDB
- Immuta vs DynamoDB
- Immuta vs Oracle Database
- Immuta vs CosmosDB
- Immuta vs DataStax
- Immuta vs dbt
- Immuta vs EMQX
- Immuta vs Cassandra
- Immuta vs Amazon Redshift

