APIs · head to head
Griffin vs Unit

Griffin
APIs
UK banking-as-a-service from a company that holds its own full banking licence
- From
- £100/month
- Rated
- -

Unit
APIs
Banking as a service platform for embedding deposit accounts, cards and payments, with a sponsor bank behind it
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Griffin platform banking carries a one-off onboarding fee from 15,000 pounds and a 3,500 pound monthly minimum, which prices out early-stage companies entirely.; Unit your product depends on a sponsor bank you do not contract with directly, and 2024 showed what that means: Thread Bank received an FDIC enforcement action naming its banking as a service programmes and Blue Ridge Bank went under an OCC consent order and offboarded fintech partners.
- They diverge on capability: Griffin covers Bank accounts by API, Unit covers Deposit accounts.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Griffin and Unit actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Griffin
- Bank accounts by API
- UK payment rails
- Integrated ledger
- Automated onboarding
- Debit cards
- Interest on balances
Only in Unit
- Deposit accounts
- Card issuing
- Payments
- White label components
- Compliance operations
- Lending
- Programme reporting
- Sandbox
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Griffin
- A wealth platform that must hold client money in a licensed bank rather than an EMI safeguarding accountnot Unit
- A lender wanting UK accounts and payment rails without becoming a bank itselfnot Unit
- A fintech burned by sponsor bank instability that wants the deposit holder and the API provider to be the same entitynot Unit
- A platform needing sub-account ledgering for pooled client funds with a clean audit trailnot Unit
Unit
- A vertical SaaS platform for contractors that wants to hold customer funds and issue expense cards without pursuing a charternot Griffin
- A payroll or benefits platform embedding accounts so employees can be paid ahead of schedulenot Griffin
- A marketplace that wants seller balances to sit in real accounts under its own brand rather than as ledger entries at a processornot Griffin
- A company that needs interchange revenue from a card programme to make the unit economics of its core product worknot Griffin
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Griffin
- Platform banking carries a one-off onboarding fee from 15,000 pounds and a 3,500 pound monthly minimum, which prices out early-stage companies entirely.
- It is UK-only, so a business with European or US operations needs a second banking provider and a second integration for those entities.
- It is a young bank with a small balance sheet relative to incumbents, and enterprise counterparties still ask hard questions about concentration risk.
- Holding a banking licence means Griffin applies bank-grade due diligence to its own clients, so onboarding is slower and more selective than an EMI-based provider.
- Feature breadth is narrower than long-established providers, particularly in card programme management and in payment types beyond core UK rails.
Unit
- Your product depends on a sponsor bank you do not contract with directly, and 2024 showed what that means: Thread Bank received an FDIC enforcement action naming its banking as a service programmes and Blue Ridge Bank went under an OCC consent order and offboarded fintech partners.
- Programme approval by the bank is a separate gate from signing with Unit, and it can add months and impose product restrictions that were not visible during the commercial conversation.
- Compliance obligations are shared but the operational load lands on you, and platforms consistently underestimate the staffing needed for disputes, escalations and the bank ongoing oversight requests.
- Pricing is unpublished and blends platform fees, per-account and per-transaction charges and interchange sharing, which makes it hard to model unit economics before you have volume and easy to be surprised by the minimum.
- Migrating a live deposit programme to a different provider or bank is extremely disruptive because it involves moving customer accounts and card credentials, so switching costs are far higher than for ordinary software.
Pricing, plan by plan
Griffin
£100/month- Business Banking$100/month
- From 100 pounds per month
- Interest or commission from around 1.75 percent AER variable
- Operational accounts and UK payment rails
- Platform Banking$3500/month
- One-off onboarding fee from 15,000 pounds
- Minimum monthly spend of 3,500 pounds, drawn down by usage
- Higher committed tiers at 5,000 and 10,000 pounds with discounts
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom pricing
- Bespoke account structures and volumes
- Negotiated interest or commission share
Unit
On request- Unit Banking as a Service$undefined/year
- Platform fee plus per-account and per-transaction charges, quoted
- Interchange sharing arrangements negotiated per programme
- Minimum commitment typical
Which should you pick?
Choose Griffin if
- You need bank accounts by api.
- You work on Web, REST API.
- You also want uk payment rails.
Choose Unit if
- You need deposit accounts.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want card issuing.
Questions people ask
- Is Griffin or Unit better?
- Neither clearly leads. Griffin starts at £100/month and Unit at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Griffin or Unit?
- Griffin starts at £100/month and Unit at On request.
- Does Griffin or Unit run on more platforms?
- Griffin runs on Web, REST API. Unit runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Griffin best used for?
- Griffin is most often used for a wealth platform that must hold client money in a licensed bank rather than an emi safeguarding account, a lender wanting uk accounts and payment rails without becoming a bank itself, a fintech burned by sponsor bank instability that wants the deposit holder and the api provider to be the same entity, a platform needing sub-account ledgering for pooled client funds with a clean audit trail. Of those, a wealth platform that must hold client money in a licensed bank rather than an emi safeguarding account and a lender wanting uk accounts and payment rails without becoming a bank itself are not what Unit is typically brought in for.
- What can Griffin do that Unit cannot?
- Griffin covers Bank accounts by API, UK payment rails, Integrated ledger, Automated onboarding. Unit covers Deposit accounts, Card issuing, Payments, White label components.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Griffin: Is Griffin actually a bank?
Yes. It received a UK banking licence with restrictions in March 2023 and a full licence in March 2024 after exiting mobilisation.
Unit: Who actually holds the money?
A chartered partner bank, not Unit. Deposits sit at the sponsor bank and FDIC insurance flows from that bank, so its condition is your condition.
Griffin: What does it cost?
Business banking from 100 pounds a month; platform banking from a 15,000 pound onboarding fee plus a 3,500 pound monthly minimum drawn down by usage.
Unit: What happened with Unit sponsor banks in 2024?
Thread Bank received an FDIC enforcement action that explicitly named its banking as a service and lending as a service programmes, and Blue Ridge Bank was under an OCC consent order from January 2024 and offboarded fintech partners. Blue Ridge exited the order in late 2025.
Griffin: Does it cover Europe?
No. Griffin is a UK bank serving UK accounts and UK payment rails.
Unit: What does Unit cost?
Not published. Expect a platform fee, per-account and per-transaction charges, an interchange share and a minimum commitment.
Unit: Do we need our own compliance team?
Yes. Unit supplies tooling and the bank sets the rules, but disputes, escalations and evidence for bank oversight require named people on your side.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Griffin vs Weavr
- Griffin vs Synctera
- Griffin vs 10x Banking
- Griffin vs Skaleet
- Griffin vs Solaris
- Griffin vs Swan
- Griffin vs Treasury Prime
- Griffin vs Vodeno
- Griffin vs Fintech Farm
- Griffin vs Astra
- Griffin vs Increase
- Griffin vs Temenos Transact
- Griffin vs Token.io
- Griffin vs Yapily
- Griffin vs Column
- Griffin vs Toqio
- Griffin vs Thredd
- Griffin vs Lithic
- Griffin vs Akana
- Griffin vs Akoya
- Griffin vs Apidog
- Griffin vs Asyncapi
- Griffin vs AWS API Gateway
- Unit vs Weavr
- Unit vs Synctera
- Unit vs 10x Banking
- Unit vs Skaleet
- Unit vs Solaris
- Unit vs Swan
- Unit vs Treasury Prime
- Unit vs Vodeno
- Unit vs Fintech Farm
- Unit vs Astra
- Unit vs Increase
- Unit vs Temenos Transact
- Unit vs Token.io
- Unit vs Yapily
- Unit vs Column
- Unit vs Toqio
- Unit vs Thredd
- Unit vs Lithic
- Unit vs Akana
- Unit vs Akoya
- Unit vs Apidog
- Unit vs Asyncapi
- Unit vs AWS API Gateway
