Browser Extensions · head to head
Greasemonkey vs Grype

Greasemonkey
Browser Extensions
The original userscript manager, for Firefox
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Grype
Cybersecurity
Vulnerability scanner for container images and filesystems
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Greasemonkey firefox only. There is no Chrome, Edge or Safari build and there never has been.; Grype depends on public vulnerability databases, so coverage and false positives vary by ecosystem
- They diverge on capability: Greasemonkey covers Userscript execution, Grype covers Image and filesystem scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 17 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Greasemonkey and Grype actually diverge.
| Attribute | Greasemonkey | Grype |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Firefox | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker |
| Category | Browser Extensions | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Greasemonkey
- Userscript execution
- Built-in script editor
- GM. API
- @resource support
- Script localisation
- Firefox for Android
Only in Grype
- Image and filesystem scanning
- SBOM-driven
- Wide ecosystem coverage
- Pipeline friendly
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Greasemonkey
- Restyling or de-cluttering a site you use dailynot Grype
- Automating a repetitive action on a web applicationnot Grype
- Adding a missing feature to a site you do not controlnot Grype
- Running userscripts on Firefox for Androidnot Grype
- Writing and testing your own scripts in the browsernot Grype
Grype
- Re-scanning stored SBOMs as new CVEs are published, without rebuilding imagesnot Greasemonkey
- Failing CI when a build introduces a known vulnerabilitynot Greasemonkey
- Auditing what is actually installed inside a third-party imagenot Greasemonkey
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Greasemonkey
- Firefox only. There is no Chrome, Edge or Safari build and there never has been.
- Its API diverged from the Tampermonkey conventions most shared scripts are written against, so a script from a sharing site may need adjusting to run.
- The dashboard is plainer than Tampermonkey's, with no diff view when a script updates itself.
- No cloud sync of the kind Tampermonkey and Violentmonkey offer; moving machines means exporting.
- A userscript manager can read and rewrite every page you visit, so the security of the arrangement depends entirely on the scripts you choose to install.
Grype
- Depends on public vulnerability databases, so coverage and false positives vary by ecosystem
- No triage, exception tracking or reporting UI — that is Anchore’s commercial product
- Overlaps heavily with Trivy, and most teams pick one rather than running both
Pricing, plan by plan
Greasemonkey
Free- Open sourceFree
- Unlimited scripts
- Built-in editor
- No account required
Grype
Free- GrypeFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Greasemonkey if
- You need userscript execution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Firefox.
- You also want built-in script editor.
Choose Grype if
- You need image and filesystem scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want sbom-driven.
Questions people ask
- Is Greasemonkey or Grype better?
- Neither clearly leads. Greasemonkey starts at Free and Grype at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Greasemonkey or Grype?
- Greasemonkey starts at Free and Grype at Free.
- Does Greasemonkey or Grype run on more platforms?
- Greasemonkey runs on Firefox. Grype runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Greasemonkey for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Greasemonkey best used for?
- Greasemonkey is most often used for restyling or de-cluttering a site you use daily, automating a repetitive action on a web application, adding a missing feature to a site you do not control, running userscripts on firefox for android. Of those, restyling or de-cluttering a site you use daily and automating a repetitive action on a web application are not what Grype is typically brought in for.
- What can Greasemonkey do that Grype cannot?
- Greasemonkey covers Userscript execution, Built-in script editor, GM. API, @resource support. Grype covers Image and filesystem scanning, SBOM-driven, Wide ecosystem coverage, Pipeline friendly.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Greasemonkey: Is Greasemonkey still maintained?
Yes. Version 4.14 was released on 2 June 2026, and the project has an active repository, bug tracker and discussion groups.
SourceGrype: Is Grype free?
Yes, open source from Anchore. Anchore Enterprise is the paid platform around it.
Greasemonkey: Does Greasemonkey work on Chrome?
No. It is a Firefox extension and has never shipped for Chrome. Violentmonkey and Tampermonkey are the equivalents there.
SourceGrype: What is the difference between Grype and Syft?
Syft generates the software bill of materials; Grype matches that inventory against vulnerability data. They are designed to be used together.
Greasemonkey: Will Tampermonkey scripts run in Greasemonkey?
Often, but not always. Greasemonkey's API diverged from the conventions most shared scripts are written against, so a script may need its header or its GM calls adjusted.
SourceGrype: Grype or Trivy?
They cover similar ground. Trivy is broader out of the box, including misconfiguration and secret scanning; Grype pairs more cleanly with an SBOM-first workflow.
Greasemonkey: Does Greasemonkey run on mobile?
On Firefox for Android, from version 4.12. There is no iOS build, because Firefox on iOS cannot load extensions of this kind.
SourceGreasemonkey: What is the GM API?
The set of functions a userscript manager exposes to scripts, named after Greasemonkey, which defined it. Greasemonkey supports the promise-based GM. form including GM.xmlHttpRequest and GM.registerMenuCommand.
SourceRelated pages
More on Greasemonkey
Other head to heads
- Greasemonkey vs FireMonkey
- Greasemonkey vs Violentmonkey
- Greasemonkey vs Tampermonkey
- Greasemonkey vs Userscripts
- Greasemonkey vs Stay
- Greasemonkey vs Raindrop.io
- Greasemonkey vs Keeper
- Greasemonkey vs Mercury Reader
- Greasemonkey vs Stylus
- Greasemonkey vs Pocket
- Greasemonkey vs Dark Reader
- Greasemonkey vs Privacy Badger
- Greasemonkey vs Rakuten
- Greasemonkey vs uBlock Origin
- Greasemonkey vs Hemingway Editor
- Greasemonkey vs Night Eye
- Greasemonkey vs React Developer Tools
- Greasemonkey vs Save to Google Drive
- Greasemonkey vs Trivy
- Greasemonkey vs Snyk
- Greasemonkey vs Semgrep
- Greasemonkey vs Chainguard
- Greasemonkey vs HashiCorp Vault
- Greasemonkey vs Bitwarden
- Greasemonkey vs Infisical
- Greasemonkey vs Authelia
- Greasemonkey vs Ory Kratos
- Greasemonkey vs OWASP ZAP
- Greasemonkey vs Cosign
- Greasemonkey vs authentik
- Greasemonkey vs Socket
- Greasemonkey vs Socure
- Greasemonkey vs SonicWall
- Greasemonkey vs Sophos Intercept X
- Greasemonkey vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Greasemonkey vs Sticky Password
- Grype vs FireMonkey
- Grype vs Violentmonkey
- Grype vs Tampermonkey
- Grype vs Userscripts
- Grype vs Stay
- Grype vs Raindrop.io
- Grype vs Keeper
- Grype vs Mercury Reader
- Grype vs Stylus
- Grype vs Pocket
- Grype vs Dark Reader
- Grype vs Privacy Badger
- Grype vs Rakuten
- Grype vs uBlock Origin
- Grype vs Hemingway Editor
- Grype vs Night Eye
- Grype vs React Developer Tools
- Grype vs Save to Google Drive
- Grype vs Trivy
- Grype vs Snyk
- Grype vs Semgrep
- Grype vs Chainguard
- Grype vs HashiCorp Vault
- Grype vs Bitwarden
- Grype vs Infisical
- Grype vs Authelia
- Grype vs Ory Kratos
- Grype vs OWASP ZAP
- Grype vs Cosign
- Grype vs authentik
- Grype vs Socket
- Grype vs Socure
- Grype vs SonicWall
- Grype vs Sophos Intercept X
- Grype vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Grype vs Sticky Password
