Browser Extensions · head to head
Greasemonkey vs Mercury Reader

Greasemonkey
Browser Extensions
The original userscript manager, for Firefox
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
Mercury Reader
Browser Extensions
Clear clutter from articles instantly
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Greasemonkey firefox only. There is no Chrome, Edge or Safari build and there never has been.; Mercury Reader mercury Reader's underlying engine (Postlight Parser) is free open source software licensed under Apache License 2.0, per the GitHub repository, with no paid tier
- They diverge on capability: Greasemonkey covers Userscript execution, Mercury Reader covers Content extraction.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 15 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Greasemonkey and Mercury Reader actually diverge.
| Attribute | Greasemonkey | Mercury Reader |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | free |
| Platforms | Firefox | Chrome, Firefox, Edge |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Browser Extensions).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Greasemonkey
- Userscript execution
- Built-in script editor
- GM. API
- @resource support
- Script localisation
- Firefox for Android
Only in Mercury Reader
- Content extraction
- Clean reading view
- Custom themes
- Font customization
- Chrome support
- Firefox support
- Edge support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Greasemonkey
- Restyling or de-cluttering a site you use dailynot Mercury Reader
- Automating a repetitive action on a web applicationnot Mercury Reader
- Adding a missing feature to a site you do not controlnot Mercury Reader
- Running userscripts on Firefox for Androidnot Mercury Reader
- Writing and testing your own scripts in the browsernot Mercury Reader
Mercury Reader
No use cases recorded yet. See the Mercury Reader review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Greasemonkey
- Firefox only. There is no Chrome, Edge or Safari build and there never has been.
- Its API diverged from the Tampermonkey conventions most shared scripts are written against, so a script from a sharing site may need adjusting to run.
- The dashboard is plainer than Tampermonkey's, with no diff view when a script updates itself.
- No cloud sync of the kind Tampermonkey and Violentmonkey offer; moving machines means exporting.
- A userscript manager can read and rewrite every page you visit, so the security of the arrangement depends entirely on the scripts you choose to install.
Mercury Reader
- Mercury Reader's underlying engine (Postlight Parser) is free open source software licensed under Apache License 2.0, per the GitHub repository, with no paid tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Greasemonkey
Free- Open sourceFree
- Unlimited scripts
- Built-in editor
- No account required
Mercury Reader
Free- FreeFree
- Clutter removal
- Clean reading
- Custom themes
Which should you pick?
Choose Greasemonkey if
- You need userscript execution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Firefox.
- You also want built-in script editor.
Choose Mercury Reader if
- You need content extraction.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome, Firefox, Edge.
- You also want clean reading view.
Questions people ask
- Is Greasemonkey or Mercury Reader better?
- Neither clearly leads. Greasemonkey starts at Free and Mercury Reader at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Greasemonkey or Mercury Reader?
- Greasemonkey starts at Free and Mercury Reader at Free.
- Does Greasemonkey or Mercury Reader run on more platforms?
- Greasemonkey runs on Firefox. Mercury Reader runs on Chrome, Firefox, Edge.
- Can I use Greasemonkey for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Greasemonkey best used for?
- Greasemonkey is most often used for restyling or de-cluttering a site you use daily, automating a repetitive action on a web application, adding a missing feature to a site you do not control, running userscripts on firefox for android. Of those, restyling or de-cluttering a site you use daily and automating a repetitive action on a web application are not what Mercury Reader is typically brought in for.
- What can Greasemonkey do that Mercury Reader cannot?
- Greasemonkey covers Userscript execution, Built-in script editor, GM. API, @resource support. Mercury Reader covers Content extraction, Clean reading view, Custom themes, Font customization.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Greasemonkey: Is Greasemonkey still maintained?
Yes. Version 4.14 was released on 2 June 2026, and the project has an active repository, bug tracker and discussion groups.
SourceGreasemonkey: Does Greasemonkey work on Chrome?
No. It is a Firefox extension and has never shipped for Chrome. Violentmonkey and Tampermonkey are the equivalents there.
SourceGreasemonkey: Will Tampermonkey scripts run in Greasemonkey?
Often, but not always. Greasemonkey's API diverged from the conventions most shared scripts are written against, so a script may need its header or its GM calls adjusted.
SourceGreasemonkey: Does Greasemonkey run on mobile?
On Firefox for Android, from version 4.12. There is no iOS build, because Firefox on iOS cannot load extensions of this kind.
SourceGreasemonkey: What is the GM API?
The set of functions a userscript manager exposes to scripts, named after Greasemonkey, which defined it. Greasemonkey supports the promise-based GM. form including GM.xmlHttpRequest and GM.registerMenuCommand.
SourceRelated pages
More on Greasemonkey
More on Mercury Reader
Other head to heads
- Greasemonkey vs FireMonkey
- Greasemonkey vs Violentmonkey
- Greasemonkey vs Tampermonkey
- Greasemonkey vs Userscripts
- Greasemonkey vs Stay
- Greasemonkey vs Raindrop.io
- Greasemonkey vs Keeper
- Greasemonkey vs Stylus
- Greasemonkey vs Pocket
- Greasemonkey vs Dark Reader
- Greasemonkey vs Privacy Badger
- Greasemonkey vs Rakuten
- Greasemonkey vs uBlock Origin
- Greasemonkey vs Hemingway Editor
- Greasemonkey vs Night Eye
- Greasemonkey vs React Developer Tools
- Greasemonkey vs Save to Google Drive
- Greasemonkey vs Instapaper
- Greasemonkey vs Evernote Web Clipper
- Greasemonkey vs Momentum
- Greasemonkey vs Arc
- Greasemonkey vs GoFullPage
- Mercury Reader vs FireMonkey
- Mercury Reader vs Violentmonkey
- Mercury Reader vs Tampermonkey
- Mercury Reader vs Userscripts
- Mercury Reader vs Stay
- Mercury Reader vs Raindrop.io
- Mercury Reader vs Keeper
- Mercury Reader vs Stylus
- Mercury Reader vs Pocket
- Mercury Reader vs Dark Reader
- Mercury Reader vs Privacy Badger
- Mercury Reader vs Rakuten
- Mercury Reader vs uBlock Origin
- Mercury Reader vs Hemingway Editor
- Mercury Reader vs Night Eye
- Mercury Reader vs React Developer Tools
- Mercury Reader vs Save to Google Drive
- Mercury Reader vs Instapaper
- Mercury Reader vs Evernote Web Clipper
- Mercury Reader vs Momentum
- Mercury Reader vs Arc
- Mercury Reader vs GoFullPage
