Cybersecurity · head to head
Grype vs Violentmonkey

Grype
Cybersecurity
Vulnerability scanner for container images and filesystems
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Grype depends on public vulnerability databases, so coverage and false positives vary by ecosystem; Violentmonkey smaller script ecosystem compared to Tampermonkey which has larger user base and more available scripts
- They diverge on capability: Grype covers Image and filesystem scanning, Violentmonkey covers Userscript support.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Grype and Violentmonkey actually diverge.
| Attribute | Grype | Violentmonkey |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker | Chrome, Firefox, Edge |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Browser Extensions |
| Founded | Unknown | 2013 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Grype
- Image and filesystem scanning
- SBOM-driven
- Wide ecosystem coverage
- Pipeline friendly
Only in Violentmonkey
- Userscript support
- Clean interface
- Cloud sync
- Script editor
- Chrome support
- Firefox support
- Edge support
- Opera support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Grype
- Re-scanning stored SBOMs as new CVEs are published, without rebuilding imagesnot Violentmonkey
- Failing CI when a build introduces a known vulnerabilitynot Violentmonkey
- Auditing what is actually installed inside a third-party imagenot Violentmonkey
Violentmonkey
- Run open-source userscripts to customize or automate web pagesnot Grype
- Import scripts compatible with Greasemonkey and Tampermonkey formatsnot Grype
- Sync scripts and settings across browsers via Dropbox, OneDrive, Google Drive, or WebDAVnot Grype
- Batch import/export scripts as zip filesnot Grype
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Grype
- Depends on public vulnerability databases, so coverage and false positives vary by ecosystem
- No triage, exception tracking or reporting UI — that is Anchore’s commercial product
- Overlaps heavily with Trivy, and most teams pick one rather than running both
Violentmonkey
- Smaller script ecosystem compared to Tampermonkey which has larger user base and more available scripts
- Less marketing and visibility results in lower adoption compared to more widely-known alternatives
- Community maintenance model means slower feature development compared to commercial alternatives
Pricing, plan by plan
Grype
Free- GrypeFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Violentmonkey
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Violentmonkey review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Grype if
- You need image and filesystem scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want sbom-driven.
Choose Violentmonkey if
- You need userscript support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome, Firefox, Edge.
- You also want clean interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Grype or Violentmonkey better?
- Neither clearly leads. Grype starts at Free and Violentmonkey at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Grype or Violentmonkey?
- Grype starts at Free and Violentmonkey at Free.
- Does Grype or Violentmonkey run on more platforms?
- Grype runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker. Violentmonkey runs on Chrome, Firefox, Edge.
- Can I use Grype for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Grype best used for?
- Grype is most often used for re-scanning stored sboms as new cves are published, without rebuilding images, failing ci when a build introduces a known vulnerability, auditing what is actually installed inside a third-party image. Of those, re-scanning stored sboms as new cves are published, without rebuilding images and failing ci when a build introduces a known vulnerability are not what Violentmonkey is typically brought in for.
- What can Grype do that Violentmonkey cannot?
- Grype covers Image and filesystem scanning, SBOM-driven, Wide ecosystem coverage, Pipeline friendly. Violentmonkey covers Userscript support, Clean interface, Cloud sync, Script editor.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Grype: Is Grype free?
Yes, open source from Anchore. Anchore Enterprise is the paid platform around it.
Violentmonkey: Is Violentmonkey open-source?
Yes. Violentmonkey is fully open-source and available on GitHub, making it free to use and community-maintained unlike Tampermonkey which has a larger proprietary ecosystem.
SourceGrype: What is the difference between Grype and Syft?
Syft generates the software bill of materials; Grype matches that inventory against vulnerability data. They are designed to be used together.
Violentmonkey: What browsers does Violentmonkey support?
Violentmonkey works on browsers with WebExtensions support, including Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and other Chromium-based browsers.
SourceGrype: Grype or Trivy?
They cover similar ground. Trivy is broader out of the box, including misconfiguration and secret scanning; Grype pairs more cleanly with an SBOM-first workflow.
Violentmonkey: How does Violentmonkey compare to Tampermonkey in performance?
Community benchmarks show Violentmonkey uses about 15 to 30 percent less RAM on Chrome compared to Tampermonkey when managing many open tabs.
SourceViolentmonkey: What is the current version of Violentmonkey?
Violentmonkey reached version 2.46.0 as of July 31, 2026, with active ongoing development and regular updates to the open-source project.
SourceRelated pages
More on Violentmonkey
Other head to heads
- Grype vs Trivy
- Grype vs Snyk
- Grype vs Semgrep
- Grype vs Chainguard
- Grype vs HashiCorp Vault
- Grype vs Bitwarden
- Grype vs Infisical
- Grype vs Authelia
- Grype vs Ory Kratos
- Grype vs OWASP ZAP
- Grype vs Cosign
- Grype vs authentik
- Grype vs Socket
- Grype vs Socure
- Grype vs SonicWall
- Grype vs Sophos Intercept X
- Grype vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Grype vs Sticky Password
- Grype vs Dark Reader
- Grype vs Privacy Badger
- Grype vs Awesome Screenshot
- Grype vs Tampermonkey
- Grype vs LanguageTool
- Grype vs uBlock Origin
- Grype vs Pocket
- Grype vs Raindrop.io
- Grype vs Instapaper
- Grype vs Honey
- Grype vs Keeper
- Grype vs Mercury Reader
- Grype vs Rakuten
- Grype vs Hemingway Editor
- Grype vs Night Eye
- Grype vs React Developer Tools
- Grype vs Save to Google Drive
- Violentmonkey vs Trivy
- Violentmonkey vs Snyk
- Violentmonkey vs Semgrep
- Violentmonkey vs Chainguard
- Violentmonkey vs HashiCorp Vault
- Violentmonkey vs Bitwarden
- Violentmonkey vs Infisical
- Violentmonkey vs Authelia
- Violentmonkey vs Ory Kratos
- Violentmonkey vs OWASP ZAP
- Violentmonkey vs Cosign
- Violentmonkey vs authentik
- Violentmonkey vs Socket
- Violentmonkey vs Socure
- Violentmonkey vs SonicWall
- Violentmonkey vs Sophos Intercept X
- Violentmonkey vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Violentmonkey vs Sticky Password
- Violentmonkey vs Dark Reader
- Violentmonkey vs Privacy Badger
- Violentmonkey vs Awesome Screenshot
- Violentmonkey vs Tampermonkey
- Violentmonkey vs LanguageTool
- Violentmonkey vs uBlock Origin
- Violentmonkey vs Pocket
- Violentmonkey vs Raindrop.io
- Violentmonkey vs Instapaper
- Violentmonkey vs Honey
- Violentmonkey vs Keeper
- Violentmonkey vs Mercury Reader
- Violentmonkey vs Rakuten
- Violentmonkey vs Hemingway Editor
- Violentmonkey vs Night Eye
- Violentmonkey vs React Developer Tools
- Violentmonkey vs Save to Google Drive

