Cybersecurity · head to head
Bitwarden vs Greasemonkey

Greasemonkey
Browser Extensions
The original userscript manager, for Firefox
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bitwarden the integrated TOTP authenticator, encrypted file attachments, vault health reports and Emergency Access are all withheld from the free plan and need Premium at $1.65 per month; Greasemonkey firefox only. There is no Chrome, Edge or Safari build and there never has been.
- They diverge on capability: Bitwarden covers Unlimited password storage, Greasemonkey covers Userscript execution.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 17 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bitwarden and Greasemonkey actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bitwarden | Greasemonkey |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | open-source |
| Platforms | Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android, Web, Cli | Firefox |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Browser Extensions |
| Founded | 2016 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bitwarden
- Unlimited password storage
- Cross-platform sync
- Secure password sharing
- Password generator
- Two-factor authentication
- Encrypted file attachments
- Vault health reports
- Emergency access
Only in Greasemonkey
- Userscript execution
- Built-in script editor
- GM. API
- @resource support
- Script localisation
- Firefox for Android
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bitwarden
- Personal password managementnot Greasemonkey
- Team credential sharingnot Greasemonkey
- Enterprise securitynot Greasemonkey
- Compliance requirementsnot Greasemonkey
- Developer secrets managementnot Greasemonkey
Greasemonkey
- Restyling or de-cluttering a site you use dailynot Bitwarden
- Automating a repetitive action on a web applicationnot Bitwarden
- Adding a missing feature to a site you do not controlnot Bitwarden
- Running userscripts on Firefox for Androidnot Bitwarden
- Writing and testing your own scripts in the browsernot Bitwarden
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bitwarden
- The integrated TOTP authenticator, encrypted file attachments, vault health reports and Emergency Access are all withheld from the free plan and need Premium at $1.65 per month
- Free accounts can share vault items with one other Bitwarden user and no more
- File storage is capped at 5 GB on Premium and 5 GB personal plus 5 GB family on the Families plan
- Two-step login accepts up to 10 hardware security keys per account
- The Families plan is capped at 6 people, so a seventh member means moving to a Teams subscription at $4 per user per month
Greasemonkey
- Firefox only. There is no Chrome, Edge or Safari build and there never has been.
- Its API diverged from the Tampermonkey conventions most shared scripts are written against, so a script from a sharing site may need adjusting to run.
- The dashboard is plainer than Tampermonkey's, with no diff view when a script updates itself.
- No cloud sync of the kind Tampermonkey and Violentmonkey offer; moving machines means exporting.
- A userscript manager can read and rewrite every page you visit, so the security of the arrangement depends entirely on the scripts you choose to install.
Pricing, plan by plan
Bitwarden
Free- FreeFree
- Basic password management
- Zero-knowledge encryption
- Advanced two-step login
- Premium$1.65/month
- Integrated authenticator
- File attachments
- Emergency access
- Premium$19.8/year
- Families$3.99/month
- Up to 6 premium accounts
- Unlimited sharing and collections
- Organization storage included
Greasemonkey
Free- Open sourceFree
- Unlimited scripts
- Built-in editor
- No account required
Which should you pick?
Choose Bitwarden if
- You need unlimited password storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android, Web, Cli.
- You also want cross-platform sync.
Choose Greasemonkey if
- You need userscript execution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Firefox.
- You also want built-in script editor.
Questions people ask
- Is Bitwarden or Greasemonkey better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bitwarden starts at Free and Greasemonkey at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bitwarden or Greasemonkey?
- Bitwarden starts at Free and Greasemonkey at Free.
- Does Bitwarden or Greasemonkey run on more platforms?
- Bitwarden runs on Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android, Web, Cli. Greasemonkey runs on Firefox.
- Can I use Bitwarden for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Bitwarden best used for?
- Bitwarden is most often used for personal password management, team credential sharing, enterprise security, compliance requirements. Of those, personal password management and team credential sharing are not what Greasemonkey is typically brought in for.
- What can Bitwarden do that Greasemonkey cannot?
- Bitwarden covers Unlimited password storage, Cross-platform sync, Secure password sharing, Password generator. Greasemonkey covers Userscript execution, Built-in script editor, GM. API, @resource support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bitwarden: Does Bitwarden have a free plan?
Yes, Bitwarden offers a free tier with basic password management, zero-knowledge encryption, advanced two-step login, and unlimited devices across browser, mobile, and desktop apps.
SourceGreasemonkey: Is Greasemonkey still maintained?
Yes. Version 4.14 was released on 2 June 2026, and the project has an active repository, bug tracker and discussion groups.
SourceBitwarden: How much does Bitwarden Premium cost?
Bitwarden Premium costs $1.65 per month billed annually at $19.80 per year, including integrated authenticator, file attachments, emergency access, and security reports.
SourceGreasemonkey: Does Greasemonkey work on Chrome?
No. It is a Firefox extension and has never shipped for Chrome. Violentmonkey and Tampermonkey are the equivalents there.
SourceBitwarden: What is the difference between Bitwarden Teams and Enterprise?
Teams plan at $4 per user per month (annual billing) includes centralized ownership and secure credential sharing. Enterprise at $6 per user per month adds granular access control, passwordless SSO, account recovery, self-hosting, and complimentary Families plans for all users.
SourceGreasemonkey: Will Tampermonkey scripts run in Greasemonkey?
Often, but not always. Greasemonkey's API diverged from the conventions most shared scripts are written against, so a script may need its header or its GM calls adjusted.
SourceGreasemonkey: Does Greasemonkey run on mobile?
On Firefox for Android, from version 4.12. There is no iOS build, because Firefox on iOS cannot load extensions of this kind.
SourceGreasemonkey: What is the GM API?
The set of functions a userscript manager exposes to scripts, named after Greasemonkey, which defined it. Greasemonkey supports the promise-based GM. form including GM.xmlHttpRequest and GM.registerMenuCommand.
SourceRelated pages
More on Greasemonkey
Other head to heads
- Bitwarden vs HashiCorp Vault
- Bitwarden vs Passbolt
- Bitwarden vs LastPass
- Bitwarden vs 1Password
- Bitwarden vs Norton 360
- Bitwarden vs Enpass
- Bitwarden vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Bitwarden vs Infisical
- Bitwarden vs Semgrep
- Bitwarden vs Trivy
- Bitwarden vs Chainguard
- Bitwarden vs Authelia
- Bitwarden vs Veracode
- Bitwarden vs Very Good Security
- Bitwarden vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Bitwarden vs Windscribe
- Bitwarden vs Yoti
- Bitwarden vs authentik
- Bitwarden vs FireMonkey
- Bitwarden vs Violentmonkey
- Bitwarden vs Tampermonkey
- Bitwarden vs Userscripts
- Bitwarden vs Stay
- Bitwarden vs Raindrop.io
- Bitwarden vs Keeper
- Bitwarden vs Mercury Reader
- Bitwarden vs Stylus
- Bitwarden vs Pocket
- Bitwarden vs Dark Reader
- Bitwarden vs Privacy Badger
- Bitwarden vs Rakuten
- Bitwarden vs uBlock Origin
- Bitwarden vs Hemingway Editor
- Bitwarden vs Night Eye
- Bitwarden vs React Developer Tools
- Bitwarden vs Save to Google Drive
- Greasemonkey vs HashiCorp Vault
- Greasemonkey vs Passbolt
- Greasemonkey vs LastPass
- Greasemonkey vs 1Password
- Greasemonkey vs Norton 360
- Greasemonkey vs Enpass
- Greasemonkey vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Greasemonkey vs Infisical
- Greasemonkey vs Semgrep
- Greasemonkey vs Trivy
- Greasemonkey vs Chainguard
- Greasemonkey vs Authelia
- Greasemonkey vs Veracode
- Greasemonkey vs Very Good Security
- Greasemonkey vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Greasemonkey vs Windscribe
- Greasemonkey vs Yoti
- Greasemonkey vs authentik
- Greasemonkey vs FireMonkey
- Greasemonkey vs Violentmonkey
- Greasemonkey vs Tampermonkey
- Greasemonkey vs Userscripts
- Greasemonkey vs Stay
- Greasemonkey vs Raindrop.io
- Greasemonkey vs Keeper
- Greasemonkey vs Mercury Reader
- Greasemonkey vs Stylus
- Greasemonkey vs Pocket
- Greasemonkey vs Dark Reader
- Greasemonkey vs Privacy Badger
- Greasemonkey vs Rakuten
- Greasemonkey vs uBlock Origin
- Greasemonkey vs Hemingway Editor
- Greasemonkey vs Night Eye
- Greasemonkey vs React Developer Tools
- Greasemonkey vs Save to Google Drive

