APIs · head to head
GraphQL Playground vs Lithic

GraphQL Playground
APIs
GraphQL IDE and documentation tool for building GraphQL APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Lithic
APIs
API-first card issuing platform with direct Visa, Mastercard and Amex network connections
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only GraphQL Playground has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GraphQL Playground apollo's own documentation states GraphQL Playground is officially retired and no longer recommended, directing users to Apollo Sandbox instead; Lithic pricing is entirely undisclosed, so a company cannot compare total cost against Marqeta, Galileo or Highnote without a sales conversation.
- They diverge on capability: GraphQL Playground covers Query building, Lithic covers Direct network connections.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphQL Playground and Lithic actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphQL Playground | Lithic |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | open-source | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Electron, Self-hosted | Web, API |
| Founded | 2018 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphQL Playground
- Query building
- Schema introspection
- Real-time testing
- GraphQL servers
- Apollo Studio
- Custom servers
- Web support
- Electron support
Only in Lithic
- Direct network connections
- Processor Client mode
- Lithic Program Management
- Card lifecycle APIs
- Sandbox environment
- Real-time authorization controls
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphQL Playground
- API Developmentnot Lithic
- API Gatewaynot Lithic
- API Testingnot Lithic
- API Documentationnot Lithic
- Microservicesnot Lithic
Lithic
- A fintech wanting direct Visa or Mastercard network access rather than routing through a third-party processornot GraphQL Playground
- A company that already holds its own issuing licence and wants API access without full programme managementnot GraphQL Playground
- A neobank or expense platform wanting Lithic to manage bank and network relationships end to endnot GraphQL Playground
- A product team prototyping a card programme in sandbox before committing to a launchnot GraphQL Playground
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphQL Playground
- Apollo's own documentation states GraphQL Playground is officially retired and no longer recommended, directing users to Apollo Sandbox instead
Lithic
- Pricing is entirely undisclosed, so a company cannot compare total cost against Marqeta, Galileo or Highnote without a sales conversation.
- Choosing Processor Client mode still leaves the company responsible for holding its own issuing licence and managing the regulatory relationship, which is a substantial undertaking many teams underestimate.
- As with any card infrastructure provider, an outage or network issue at Lithic becomes a direct outage for every card programme built on it, and a customer has limited visibility into root cause during an incident.
- Building a card programme on API infrastructure requires real engineering investment; it is not a plug-and-play product for a non-technical team.
- Switching card infrastructure providers after launch is a major undertaking involving card reissuance and programme migration, so the initial choice carries lasting lock-in.
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphQL Playground
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full GraphQL IDE
- Community support
Lithic
On request- Lithic$undefined/year
- Volume and interchange-based pricing, not published
- Separate Processor Client and Program Management pricing tracks
- Custom quote required via sales
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphQL Playground if
- You need query building.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Electron, Self-hosted.
- You also want schema introspection.
Choose Lithic if
- You need direct network connections.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want processor client mode.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphQL Playground or Lithic better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphQL Playground starts at Free and Lithic at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphQL Playground or Lithic?
- GraphQL Playground has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for GraphQL Playground and On request for Lithic.
- Does GraphQL Playground or Lithic run on more platforms?
- GraphQL Playground runs on Web, Electron, Self-hosted. Lithic runs on Web, API.
- Can I use GraphQL Playground for free?
- Yes. GraphQL Playground has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Lithic starts at On request.
- What is GraphQL Playground best used for?
- GraphQL Playground is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what Lithic is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphQL Playground do that Lithic cannot?
- GraphQL Playground covers Query building, Schema introspection, Real-time testing, GraphQL servers. Lithic covers Direct network connections, Processor Client mode, Lithic Program Management, Card lifecycle APIs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphQL Playground: Is GraphQL Playground free to use?
GraphQL Playground is a testing tool for Apollo Server and is free to use as part of the Apollo Server documentation. However, the broader Apollo GraphQL platform has various paid tiers available for production use.
SourceLithic: Does Lithic publish pricing?
No, pricing is volume-based and requires a sales conversation.
GraphQL Playground: Is GraphQL Playground part of a paid product?
GraphQL Playground is a testing tool within the Apollo ecosystem. While Playground itself is free, Apollo offers paid tiers starting at $5 per million requests for the Developer tier, with Standard and Enterprise plans available at custom pricing.
SourceLithic: What is the difference between Processor Client and Program Management?
Processor Client suits companies with their own issuing licence and bank relationships; Program Management is for companies wanting Lithic to coordinate those relationships on their behalf.
GraphQL Playground: What is the cost structure for Apollo GraphQL's paid plans?
Apollo uses volume-based tiered pricing for requests: first 250M operations cost $5.00 per million plus $2.00 for performance add-on; next 750M operations are $4.25 per million plus $1.50 add-on; additional tiers scale down to $3.00 per million plus $0.50 add-on for operations over 5 billion.
SourceLithic: Which networks does it connect to?
Visa, Mastercard and American Express directly.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Playground
Other head to heads
- GraphQL Playground vs Hasura
- GraphQL Playground vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Playground vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Playground vs Sanity
- GraphQL Playground vs GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL Playground vs Apollo GraphQL
- GraphQL Playground vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Playground vs HTTPie
- GraphQL Playground vs Directus
- GraphQL Playground vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Playground vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Playground vs Strapi
- GraphQL Playground vs Solaris
- GraphQL Playground vs Stainless
- GraphQL Playground vs Thredd
- GraphQL Playground vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Playground vs Tribe Payments
- GraphQL Playground vs Unit
- GraphQL Playground vs Highnote
- GraphQL Playground vs Vodeno
- GraphQL Playground vs Swan
- GraphQL Playground vs Treasury Prime
- GraphQL Playground vs Marqeta
- GraphQL Playground vs Synctera
- GraphQL Playground vs Weavr
- GraphQL Playground vs Increase
- GraphQL Playground vs i2c
- GraphQL Playground vs Brite Payments
- GraphQL Playground vs Bruno
- GraphQL Playground vs Bud Financial
- GraphQL Playground vs Episode Six
- GraphQL Playground vs Kong Gateway
- Lithic vs Hasura
- Lithic vs Appwrite
- Lithic vs PocketBase
- Lithic vs Sanity
- Lithic vs GraphQL Apollo
- Lithic vs Apollo GraphQL
- Lithic vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Lithic vs HTTPie
- Lithic vs Directus
- Lithic vs KeystoneJS
- Lithic vs Parse Server
- Lithic vs Strapi
- Lithic vs Solaris
- Lithic vs Stainless
- Lithic vs Thredd
- Lithic vs Thunder Client
- Lithic vs Tribe Payments
- Lithic vs Unit
- Lithic vs Highnote
- Lithic vs Vodeno
- Lithic vs Swan
- Lithic vs Treasury Prime
- Lithic vs Marqeta
- Lithic vs Synctera
- Lithic vs Weavr
- Lithic vs Increase
- Lithic vs i2c
- Lithic vs Brite Payments
- Lithic vs Bruno
- Lithic vs Bud Financial
- Lithic vs Episode Six
- Lithic vs Kong Gateway
