APIs · head to head
GraphQL Apollo vs Grype

Grype
Cybersecurity
Vulnerability scanner for container images and filesystems
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing; Grype depends on public vulnerability databases, so coverage and false positives vary by ecosystem
- They diverge on capability: GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Grype covers Image and filesystem scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphQL Apollo and Grype actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphQL Apollo | Grype |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker |
| Category | APIs | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2016 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
Only in Grype
- Image and filesystem scanning
- SBOM-driven
- Wide ecosystem coverage
- Pipeline friendly
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot Grype
- Schema federationnot Grype
- API analytics and monitoringnot Grype
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot Grype
Grype
- Re-scanning stored SBOMs as new CVEs are published, without rebuilding imagesnot GraphQL Apollo
- Failing CI when a build introduces a known vulnerabilitynot GraphQL Apollo
- Auditing what is actually installed inside a third-party imagenot GraphQL Apollo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
Grype
- Depends on public vulnerability databases, so coverage and false positives vary by ecosystem
- No triage, exception tracking or reporting UI — that is Anchore’s commercial product
- Overlaps heavily with Trivy, and most teams pick one rather than running both
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
Grype
Free- GrypeFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Choose Grype if
- You need image and filesystem scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want sbom-driven.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphQL Apollo or Grype better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Grype at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphQL Apollo or Grype?
- GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Grype at Free.
- Does GraphQL Apollo or Grype run on more platforms?
- GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile. Grype runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use GraphQL Apollo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is GraphQL Apollo best used for?
- GraphQL Apollo is most often used for graphql api management, schema federation, api analytics and monitoring, developer-focused infrastructure. Of those, graphql api management and schema federation are not what Grype is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphQL Apollo do that Grype cannot?
- GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs. Grype covers Image and filesystem scanning, SBOM-driven, Wide ecosystem coverage, Pipeline friendly.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
SourceGrype: Is Grype free?
Yes, open source from Anchore. Anchore Enterprise is the paid platform around it.
GraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
SourceGrype: What is the difference between Grype and Syft?
Syft generates the software bill of materials; Grype matches that inventory against vulnerability data. They are designed to be used together.
GraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
SourceGrype: Grype or Trivy?
They cover similar ground. Trivy is broader out of the box, including misconfiguration and secret scanning; Grype pairs more cleanly with an SBOM-first workflow.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs Trivy
- GraphQL Apollo vs Snyk
- GraphQL Apollo vs Semgrep
- GraphQL Apollo vs Chainguard
- GraphQL Apollo vs HashiCorp Vault
- GraphQL Apollo vs Bitwarden
- GraphQL Apollo vs Infisical
- GraphQL Apollo vs Authelia
- GraphQL Apollo vs Ory Kratos
- GraphQL Apollo vs OWASP ZAP
- GraphQL Apollo vs Cosign
- GraphQL Apollo vs authentik
- GraphQL Apollo vs Socket
- GraphQL Apollo vs Socure
- GraphQL Apollo vs SonicWall
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sophos Intercept X
- GraphQL Apollo vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sticky Password
- Grype vs Hasura
- Grype vs Appwrite
- Grype vs PocketBase
- Grype vs Sanity
- Grype vs Strapi
- Grype vs GraphQL Playground
- Grype vs Kong Gateway
- Grype vs Parse Server
- Grype vs WSO2 API Manager
- Grype vs Janus Gateway
- Grype vs Directus
- Grype vs KeystoneJS
- Grype vs Solaris
- Grype vs Stainless
- Grype vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Grype vs Thredd
- Grype vs Thunder Client
- Grype vs Trivy
- Grype vs Snyk
- Grype vs Semgrep
- Grype vs Chainguard
- Grype vs HashiCorp Vault
- Grype vs Bitwarden
- Grype vs Infisical
- Grype vs Authelia
- Grype vs Ory Kratos
- Grype vs OWASP ZAP
- Grype vs Cosign
- Grype vs authentik
- Grype vs Socket
- Grype vs Socure
- Grype vs SonicWall
- Grype vs Sophos Intercept X
- Grype vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Grype vs Sticky Password

