Logging · head to head
Grafana Loki vs Stackdriver
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Grafana Loki grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment; Stackdriver stackdriver is now branded Google Cloud Observability and cloud.google.com/stackdriver redirects to the Observability product page
- They diverge on capability: Grafana Loki covers Log aggregation, Stackdriver covers Log management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Grafana Loki and Stackdriver actually diverge.
| Attribute | Grafana Loki | Stackdriver |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | usage-based |
| Platforms | Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support) | Web, Api |
| Founded | 2014 | 2006 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Grafana Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- LogQL language
- Cost-effective
Only in Stackdriver
- Log management
- Metrics collection
- Real-time monitoring
- Error reporting
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Grafana Loki
- Cost-sensitive organisations deploying Kubernetes and Prometheus ecosystemsnot Stackdriver
- Teams needing index-free log aggregation for high-volume environmentsnot Stackdriver
Stackdriver
- Application performance monitoringnot Grafana Loki
- Log aggregation and analysisnot Grafana Loki
- Cloud infrastructure observabilitynot Grafana Loki
- Distributed trace analysisnot Grafana Loki
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Grafana Loki
- Grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment
- Open-source version requires self-hosting all infrastructure including storage and scaling
Stackdriver
- Stackdriver is now branded Google Cloud Observability and cloud.google.com/stackdriver redirects to the Observability product page
- Cloud Logging charges $0.50 per GiB ingested, with only the first 50 GiB per project per month free
- Logs kept beyond 30 days cost an extra $0.01 per GiB per month on top of the ingestion charge
- Monitoring metric ingestion starts at $0.2580 per MiB, with only the first 150 MiB per billing account free
- Alerting policies are billed at $0.35 per month for each metric reference in the policy
- Uptime checks cost $0.30 per 1,000 executions and synthetic monitors $1.20 per 1,000 executions, with only 100 synthetic executions per billing account free
- Monitoring read API calls cost $0.50 per million time series returned beyond the first million per billing account
- Log volume is measured before indexing on the actual size of log entries, so verbose logging directly drives cost
Pricing, plan by plan
Grafana Loki
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Grafana Loki review.
Stackdriver
Free- FreeFree
- Log management
- Metrics collection
- Real-time monitoring
Which should you pick?
Choose Grafana Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support).
- You also want label-based indexing.
Choose Stackdriver if
- You need log management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want metrics collection.
Questions people ask
- Is Grafana Loki or Stackdriver better?
- Neither clearly leads. Grafana Loki starts at Free and Stackdriver at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Grafana Loki or Stackdriver?
- Grafana Loki starts at Free and Stackdriver at Free.
- Does Grafana Loki or Stackdriver run on more platforms?
- Grafana Loki runs on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support). Stackdriver runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Grafana Loki for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Grafana Loki best used for?
- Grafana Loki is most often used for cost-sensitive organisations deploying kubernetes and prometheus ecosystems, teams needing index-free log aggregation for high-volume environments. Of those, cost-sensitive organisations deploying kubernetes and prometheus ecosystems and teams needing index-free log aggregation for high-volume environments are not what Stackdriver is typically brought in for.
- What can Grafana Loki do that Stackdriver cannot?
- Grafana Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, LogQL language, Cost-effective. Stackdriver covers Log management, Metrics collection, Real-time monitoring, Error reporting. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Grafana Loki: Is there a free tier for Grafana Cloud?
Yes, Grafana Cloud has a Free Forever plan at no cost with no registration required. The free tier is suitable for personal projects and early-stage startups.
SourceStackdriver: How much does Google Cloud Observability (Stackdriver) cost?
Google Cloud Observability does not publish fixed subscription prices. The service uses a usage-based pricing model where you pay for actual consumption. Specific rates require visiting the individual pricing pages for Cloud Logging, Cloud Monitoring, Cloud Trace, and Cloud Profiler.
SourceGrafana Loki: How long is data retained in Grafana's free plan?
The free tier retains metrics, logs, traces, and profiles for 14 days.
SourceStackdriver: What is the pricing model for Cloud Logging?
Cloud Logging uses usage-based pricing charged per GB of logs ingested and per GB stored, with monthly free tiers included. Storage charges vary by retention period and location.
SourceGrafana Loki: What is the minimum cost for Grafana Enterprise?
Grafana Enterprise has a minimum annual commitment of 25,000 dollars.
SourceStackdriver: How is Cloud Monitoring billed?
Cloud Monitoring charges per custom metric time series per month, with a monthly free tier for metrics. Standard monitoring includes basic default metrics at no extra charge.
SourceGrafana Loki: Do I need a credit card to use Grafana's free tier?
No, Grafana Cloud's Free Forever plan requires no credit card to get started.
SourceGrafana Loki: How is Grafana Cloud billed?
Grafana Cloud Pro starts at 19 dollars per month with usage-based charges on top. Billing is monthly based on your consumption. Grafana offers automatic volume discounts based on your spending.
SourceRelated pages
More on Grafana Loki
More on Stackdriver
Other head to heads
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Grafana Loki vs New Relic
- Grafana Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Grafana Loki vs Coralogix
- Grafana Loki vs Axiom
- Grafana Loki vs Logz.io
- Grafana Loki vs InfluxDB
- Grafana Loki vs Better Stack
- Grafana Loki vs Graylog
- Grafana Loki vs Papertrail
- Grafana Loki vs Raygun
- Grafana Loki vs Retrace
- Grafana Loki vs Rollbar
- Grafana Loki vs Sematext
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic APM
- Grafana Loki vs New Relic Logs
- Grafana Loki vs ELK Stack
- Grafana Loki vs Filebeat
- Grafana Loki vs Azure Monitor
- Grafana Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Grafana Loki vs Fluentd
- Grafana Loki vs Sumo Logic
- Grafana Loki vs Timber
- Grafana Loki vs Traceloop
- Grafana Loki vs Uptime.com
- Grafana Loki vs Vector
- Grafana Loki vs Checkly
- Grafana Loki vs CloudWatch
- Stackdriver vs Elastic Stack
- Stackdriver vs New Relic
- Stackdriver vs Datadog Logs
- Stackdriver vs Coralogix
- Stackdriver vs Axiom
- Stackdriver vs Logz.io
- Stackdriver vs InfluxDB
- Stackdriver vs Better Stack
- Stackdriver vs Graylog
- Stackdriver vs Papertrail
- Stackdriver vs Raygun
- Stackdriver vs Retrace
- Stackdriver vs Rollbar
- Stackdriver vs Sematext
- Stackdriver vs Elastic APM
- Stackdriver vs New Relic Logs
- Stackdriver vs ELK Stack
- Stackdriver vs Filebeat
- Stackdriver vs Azure Monitor
- Stackdriver vs Dynatrace Logs
- Stackdriver vs Fluentd
- Stackdriver vs Sumo Logic
- Stackdriver vs Timber
- Stackdriver vs Traceloop
- Stackdriver vs Uptime.com
- Stackdriver vs Vector
- Stackdriver vs Checkly
- Stackdriver vs CloudWatch


