Software · head to head
Datadog vs Grafana Loki
The short version
- Only Grafana Loki has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Datadog consumption-based pricing model makes costs hard to predict and can scale quickly; Grafana Loki grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment
- They diverge on capability: Datadog covers Infrastructure monitoring, Grafana Loki covers Log aggregation.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Datadog and Grafana Loki actually diverge.
| Attribute | Datadog | Grafana Loki |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $15/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Unknown | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Windows, macOS | Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support) |
| Founded | 2010 | 2014 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Datadog
- Infrastructure monitoring
- Application performance monitoring
- Log management
- Real user monitoring
- Synthetic monitoring
- Security monitoring
- Network monitoring
- Serverless monitoring
Only in Grafana Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- LogQL language
- Cost-effective
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Datadog
- Infrastructure monitoringnot Grafana Loki
- Application performancenot Grafana Loki
- Security monitoringnot Grafana Loki
- Log analysisnot Grafana Loki
- Cloud monitoringnot Grafana Loki
Grafana Loki
- Cost-sensitive organisations deploying Kubernetes and Prometheus ecosystemsnot Datadog
- Teams needing index-free log aggregation for high-volume environmentsnot Datadog
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Datadog
- Consumption-based pricing model makes costs hard to predict and can scale quickly
- Add-on modules significantly increase costs: custom metrics, indexed spans, extended retention
- No free tier for production monitoring
- High costs for organizations with large amounts of log data or high-cardinality metrics
Grafana Loki
- Grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment
- Open-source version requires self-hosting all infrastructure including storage and scaling
Pricing, plan by plan
Datadog
$15/month- Infrastructure Monitoring$15/month
- Host monitoring
- Basic dashboards
- APM$31/month
- Application performance monitoring
- Trace collection
- Log Management$0.1/gb
- Log indexing
- Search and filter
Grafana Loki
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Grafana Loki review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Datadog if
- You need infrastructure monitoring.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want application performance monitoring.
Choose Grafana Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support).
- You also want label-based indexing.
Questions people ask
- Is Datadog or Grafana Loki better?
- Neither clearly leads. Datadog starts at $15/month and Grafana Loki at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Datadog or Grafana Loki?
- Grafana Loki has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $15/month for Datadog and Free for Grafana Loki.
- Does Datadog or Grafana Loki run on more platforms?
- Datadog runs on Web, Linux, Windows, macOS. Grafana Loki runs on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support).
- Can I use Grafana Loki for free?
- Yes. Grafana Loki has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Datadog starts at $15/month.
- What is Datadog best used for?
- Datadog is most often used for infrastructure monitoring, application performance, security monitoring, log analysis. Of those, infrastructure monitoring and application performance are not what Grafana Loki is typically brought in for.
- What can Datadog do that Grafana Loki cannot?
- Datadog covers Infrastructure monitoring, Application performance monitoring, Log management, Real user monitoring. Grafana Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, LogQL language, Cost-effective.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Datadog: How is Datadog pricing structured?
Datadog uses consumption-based pricing tied to data volume ingested, hosts monitored, and products enabled. Infrastructure Monitoring starts at $15/host/month, APM at $31/host/month, and Log Management at $0.10/GB for indexed logs.
SourceDatadog: Does Datadog offer a free tier?
Datadog offers a free trial but not a permanent free tier for production monitoring. Pricing begins with paid plans only.
SourceDatadog: What integrations does Datadog support?
Datadog offers 1000+ built-in integrations including AWS, Kubernetes, Docker, Azure, GCP, and most major cloud platforms and services.
SourceDatadog: Can Datadog monitor Kubernetes clusters?
Yes. The Datadog Agent runs as a DaemonSet to provide real-time visibility into pods, nodes, deployments, and control-plane health across major Kubernetes distributions including EKS, AKS, GKE, OpenShift, and others.
SourceDatadog: How can I reduce Datadog costs?
Datadog bills based on indexed logs, custom metrics, and high-cardinality tags. Costs can be unpredictable and may run 2-3x estimates. Prepaying annually can secure 5-15% discounts.
SourceRelated pages
More on Grafana Loki
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Datadog vs Asana
- Datadog vs ClickUp
- Datadog vs Figma
- Datadog vs Linear
- Datadog vs Monday.com
- Datadog vs Greenhouse
- Datadog vs Notion
- Datadog vs Amplitude
- Datadog vs PostHog
- Datadog vs PyCharm
- Datadog vs Sketch
- Datadog vs Docker
- Datadog vs Netlify
- Datadog vs Okta
- Datadog vs Aha!
- Datadog vs Coda
- Datadog vs Dashlane
- Datadog vs GitHub
- Datadog vs Elastic Stack
- Datadog vs New Relic
- Datadog vs Datadog Logs
- Datadog vs Coralogix
- Datadog vs CloudWatch
- Datadog vs Dynatrace
- Datadog vs InfluxDB
- Datadog vs Airbrake
- Datadog vs AppDynamics
- Datadog vs Axiom
- Datadog vs Azure Monitor
- Datadog vs Better Stack
- Datadog vs Bugsnag
- Datadog vs Dynatrace Logs
- Datadog vs Elastic
- Datadog vs Elastic APM
- Datadog vs Elasticsearch Service
- Datadog vs ELK Stack
- Grafana Loki vs Asana
- Grafana Loki vs ClickUp
- Grafana Loki vs Figma
- Grafana Loki vs Linear
- Grafana Loki vs Monday.com
- Grafana Loki vs Greenhouse
- Grafana Loki vs Notion
- Grafana Loki vs Amplitude
- Grafana Loki vs PostHog
- Grafana Loki vs PyCharm
- Grafana Loki vs Sketch
- Grafana Loki vs Docker
- Grafana Loki vs Netlify
- Grafana Loki vs Okta
- Grafana Loki vs Aha!
- Grafana Loki vs Coda
- Grafana Loki vs Dashlane
- Grafana Loki vs GitHub
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Grafana Loki vs New Relic
- Grafana Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Grafana Loki vs Coralogix
- Grafana Loki vs CloudWatch
- Grafana Loki vs Dynatrace
- Grafana Loki vs InfluxDB
- Grafana Loki vs Airbrake
- Grafana Loki vs AppDynamics
- Grafana Loki vs Axiom
- Grafana Loki vs Azure Monitor
- Grafana Loki vs Better Stack
- Grafana Loki vs Bugsnag
- Grafana Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic APM
- Grafana Loki vs Elasticsearch Service
- Grafana Loki vs ELK Stack


