Softwr

Developer Tools · head to head

GNAT Pro vs WarpBuild

GNAT Pro logo

GNAT Pro

Developer Tools

Software development environments and toolchains for Ada, C/C++ and Rust

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
WarpBuild logo

WarpBuild

Developer Tools

2x faster, 50% cheaper GitHub Actions runners

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: GNAT Pro no pricing published on website; requires contacting AdaCore directly for quotes; WarpBuild per-minute pricing requires tracking usage to estimate monthly costs

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which GNAT Pro and WarpBuild actually diverge.

Attributes where GNAT Pro and WarpBuild differ
AttributeGNAT ProWarpBuild
Pricing modelquoteUsage-based per minute, varies by runner configuration
PlatformsWebGitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Cloud

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in GNAT Pro

Nothing recorded that WarpBuild does not also cover.

Only in WarpBuild

  • Optimized runner infrastructure
  • Intelligent caching
  • Incremental builds
  • Multi-architecture support
  • Unlimited concurrency
  • Autoscaling
  • BYOC support
  • Docker builders

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

GNAT Pro

  • Building certified avionics software meeting DO-178B/C standardsnot WarpBuild
  • Developing automotive embedded systems with ISO-26262 compliancenot WarpBuild
  • Integrating Ada, C/C++, and Rust components in single codebasenot WarpBuild
  • Managing software supply chain vulnerabilities and SBOMsnot WarpBuild
  • Supporting long-lived software systems spanning decadesnot WarpBuild

WarpBuild

  • Accelerating CI builds for teams with high test volumesnot GNAT Pro
  • Running tests generated by AI coding assistants efficientlynot GNAT Pro
  • Reducing GitHub Actions costs by 50% or morenot GNAT Pro
  • Supporting teams that need ARM64 architecture runnersnot GNAT Pro

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

GNAT Pro

  • No pricing published on website; requires contacting AdaCore directly for quotes
  • Vendor indicates per-user, per-year subscription model but does not disclose specific costs

WarpBuild

  • Per-minute pricing requires tracking usage to estimate monthly costs
  • Large configuration runners (32 vCPU) expensive at $0.064/min
  • macOS M4 Pro 12-core at $0.16/min is highest-cost option
  • BYOC option requires cloud setup by customer

Pricing, plan by plan

GNAT Pro

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the GNAT Pro review.

WarpBuild

On request
  • Linux x86-64 (2vCPU, 8GB)$0.004/minute
    • 2 vCPU
    • 8 GB RAM
    • Standard performance
  • Linux x86-64 (4vCPU, 16GB)$0.008/minute
    • 4 vCPU
    • 16 GB RAM
    • Increased performance
  • Linux x86-64 (8vCPU, 32GB)$0.016/minute
    • 8 vCPU
    • 32 GB RAM
    • High performance
  • Linux x86-64 (16vCPU, 64GB)$0.032/minute
    • 16 vCPU
    • 64 GB RAM
    • Enterprise performance

Which should you pick?

Choose GNAT Pro if

Nothing in the data separates GNAT Pro from WarpBuild on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

GNAT Pro review

Choose WarpBuild if

  • You need optimized runner infrastructure.
  • You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Cloud.
  • You also want intelligent caching.
WarpBuild review

Questions people ask

Is GNAT Pro or WarpBuild better?
Neither clearly leads. GNAT Pro starts at On request and WarpBuild at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, GNAT Pro or WarpBuild?
GNAT Pro starts at On request and WarpBuild at On request.
Does GNAT Pro or WarpBuild run on more platforms?
GNAT Pro runs on Web. WarpBuild runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Cloud.
What is GNAT Pro best used for?
GNAT Pro is most often used for building certified avionics software meeting do-178b/c standards, developing automotive embedded systems with iso-26262 compliance, integrating ada, c/c++, and rust components in single codebase, managing software supply chain vulnerabilities and sboms. Of those, building certified avionics software meeting do-178b/c standards and developing automotive embedded systems with iso-26262 compliance are not what WarpBuild is typically brought in for.
What can GNAT Pro do that WarpBuild cannot?
WarpBuild covers Optimized runner infrastructure, Intelligent caching, Incremental builds, Multi-architecture support.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

GNAT Pro: How much does GNAT Pro cost?

GNAT Pro pricing is not published on the website. Customers must request a pricing quote by contacting AdaCore directly or speaking with a GNAT Pro expert.

Source
WarpBuild: How much cheaper is WarpBuild compared to GitHub Actions?

WarpBuild offers approximately 50% cost savings compared to GitHub-hosted runners. For example, Linux x86-64 2vCPU/8GB costs $0.004/min with WarpBuild vs $0.008/min with GitHub Actions.

Source
GNAT Pro: What is GNAT Pro licensing model?

GNAT Pro is sold on a per-user, per-year basis with no license locks. Customers can request pricing for their specific needs.

Source
WarpBuild: What is BYOC and how does it differ from managed runners?

BYOC (Bring Your Own Cloud) allows customers to run WarpBuild on their own cloud infrastructure at $0.002/min. Managed runners use WarpBuild's cloud infrastructure. BYOC provides lower costs but requires customer setup.

Source
WarpBuild: Does WarpBuild support ARM64 runners?

Yes, WarpBuild offers ARM64 runners at lower costs than x86-64. Linux ARM64 starts at $0.003/min for 2vCPU/8GB configuration.

Source
Share

Related pages

More on GNAT Pro

More on WarpBuild

Keep looking

Other head to heads