Developer Tools · head to head
GNAT Pro vs Restate

GNAT Pro
Developer Tools
Software development environments and toolchains for Ada, C/C++ and Rust
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Restate
Developer Tools
Durable execution engine in Rust with a free tier and low-latency workflows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Restate has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GNAT Pro no pricing published on website; requires contacting AdaCore directly for quotes; Restate the runtime is under a Business Source Licence rather than an open source licence, so building a competing managed offering on it is prohibited and some procurement functions will reject it on licence grounds alone.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GNAT Pro and Restate actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GNAT Pro
Nothing recorded that Restate does not also cover.
Only in Restate
- Durable execution
- Virtual objects
- Single binary runtime
- Multi-language SDKs
- Workflows and sagas
- Restate Cloud
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GNAT Pro
- Building certified avionics software meeting DO-178B/C standardsnot Restate
- Developing automotive embedded systems with ISO-26262 compliancenot Restate
- Integrating Ada, C/C++, and Rust components in single codebasenot Restate
- Managing software supply chain vulnerabilities and SBOMsnot Restate
- Supporting long-lived software systems spanning decadesnot Restate
Restate
- Payment or order flows where a crash between two external API calls must not double-charge or lose the ordernot GNAT Pro
- AI agent loops that call tools over minutes or hours and must survive a deployment mid-runnot GNAT Pro
- Replacing hand-rolled retry, idempotency key and outbox code across a set of microservicesnot GNAT Pro
- A small team that wants durable workflows without operating a Temporal cluster and its databasenot GNAT Pro
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GNAT Pro
- No pricing published on website; requires contacting AdaCore directly for quotes
- Vendor indicates per-user, per-year subscription model but does not disclose specific costs
Restate
- The runtime is under a Business Source Licence rather than an open source licence, so building a competing managed offering on it is prohibited and some procurement functions will reject it on licence grounds alone.
- Restate Cloud jumps from a free fifty thousand actions straight to 300 US dollars a month for twenty million, so a workload sitting at a few hundred thousand actions pays enterprise-shaped money for hobby-shaped volume.
- It is a young project against Temporal’s established base, so hiring engineers who already know it is unrealistic and the answer to most questions is in the docs rather than on Stack Overflow.
- The programming model requires structuring code around durable handlers and virtual objects, which is a genuine rewrite for existing services rather than a library you add.
- The single-binary simplicity that makes small deployments cheap also means fewer operational knobs at very large scale than a system designed as separable components.
Pricing, plan by plan
GNAT Pro
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GNAT Pro review.
Restate
Free- FreeFree
- Fifty thousand durable actions per month
- No credit card required
- Community support
- Starter$300/month
- Twenty million actions per month
- Two hundred actions per second, bursting to one thousand
- Twenty GB storage
- Pro$1000/month
- Fifty million actions per month
- Five hundred actions per second, bursting to two thousand
- Fifty GB storage
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated volume
- Twenty-four seven P0 support
- 99.99 per cent SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose GNAT Pro if
Nothing in the data separates GNAT Pro from Restate on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Restate if
- You need durable execution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Web.
- You also want virtual objects.
Questions people ask
- Is GNAT Pro or Restate better?
- Neither clearly leads. GNAT Pro starts at On request and Restate at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GNAT Pro or Restate?
- Restate has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for GNAT Pro and Free for Restate.
- Does GNAT Pro or Restate run on more platforms?
- GNAT Pro runs on Web. Restate runs on Linux, macOS, Web.
- Can I use Restate for free?
- Yes. Restate has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GNAT Pro starts at On request.
- What is GNAT Pro best used for?
- GNAT Pro is most often used for building certified avionics software meeting do-178b/c standards, developing automotive embedded systems with iso-26262 compliance, integrating ada, c/c++, and rust components in single codebase, managing software supply chain vulnerabilities and sboms. Of those, building certified avionics software meeting do-178b/c standards and developing automotive embedded systems with iso-26262 compliance are not what Restate is typically brought in for.
- What can GNAT Pro do that Restate cannot?
- Restate covers Durable execution, Virtual objects, Single binary runtime, Multi-language SDKs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GNAT Pro: How much does GNAT Pro cost?
GNAT Pro pricing is not published on the website. Customers must request a pricing quote by contacting AdaCore directly or speaking with a GNAT Pro expert.
SourceRestate: Is Restate open source?
The SDKs are MIT. The runtime is under a Business Source Licence, which permits self-hosting but not offering it as a competing service.
GNAT Pro: What is GNAT Pro licensing model?
GNAT Pro is sold on a per-user, per-year basis with no license locks. Customers can request pricing for their specific needs.
SourceRestate: How does it compare with Temporal?
Same problem, different shape: one Rust binary with embedded storage instead of a server plus database plus workers, and lower per-step latency.
Restate: Is there a free tier?
Yes, fifty thousand durable actions a month on Restate Cloud with no card required.
Restate: Which languages are supported?
TypeScript, Java, Kotlin, Go, Python and Rust.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- GNAT Pro vs CLion
- GNAT Pro vs Rust
- GNAT Pro vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- GNAT Pro vs Keil MDK
- GNAT Pro vs RAD Studio
- GNAT Pro vs Penpot
- GNAT Pro vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- GNAT Pro vs Helix
- GNAT Pro vs JetBrains Rider
- GNAT Pro vs Coder
- GNAT Pro vs StackBlitz
- GNAT Pro vs ConfigCat
- GNAT Pro vs Nixpacks
- GNAT Pro vs Octopus Deploy
- GNAT Pro vs Okteto
- GNAT Pro vs OpsLevel
- GNAT Pro vs PartyKit
- GNAT Pro vs PhpStorm
- GNAT Pro vs Atlantis
- GNAT Pro vs Jitsu
- GNAT Pro vs Argo CD
- GNAT Pro vs Steampipe
- GNAT Pro vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- GNAT Pro vs Deno
- GNAT Pro vs Visual Studio Code
- GNAT Pro vs Turborepo
- GNAT Pro vs Keycloak
- GNAT Pro vs Prettier
- GNAT Pro vs Tilt
- GNAT Pro vs WarpBuild
- GNAT Pro vs Webpack
- Restate vs CLion
- Restate vs Rust
- Restate vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Restate vs Keil MDK
- Restate vs RAD Studio
- Restate vs Penpot
- Restate vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Restate vs Helix
- Restate vs JetBrains Rider
- Restate vs Coder
- Restate vs StackBlitz
- Restate vs ConfigCat
- Restate vs Nixpacks
- Restate vs Octopus Deploy
- Restate vs Okteto
- Restate vs OpsLevel
- Restate vs PartyKit
- Restate vs PhpStorm
- Restate vs Atlantis
- Restate vs Jitsu
- Restate vs Argo CD
- Restate vs Steampipe
- Restate vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Restate vs Deno
- Restate vs Visual Studio Code
- Restate vs Turborepo
- Restate vs Keycloak
- Restate vs Prettier
- Restate vs Tilt
- Restate vs WarpBuild
- Restate vs Webpack
