Technology · head to head
GitHub Desktop vs Kami

GitHub Desktop
Technology
A free, open source Git client from GitHub for Windows and macOS that covers common workflows rather than all of Git.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Kami
Productivity
The ultimate document annotation and collaboration tool
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GitHub Desktop there is no official Linux build; the application ships for Windows and macOS only, and the community fork at shiftkey/desktop that packages it for Linux is maintained separately and lags official releases, so a mixed-OS team cannot standardise on one client.; Kami the free Basic plan exposes only about 10 of the 40 or more tools
- They diverge on capability: GitHub Desktop covers Line-level staging, Kami covers PDF annotation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GitHub Desktop and Kami actually diverge.
| Attribute | GitHub Desktop | Kami |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | free | freemium |
| Platforms | Windows, Macos | Web, Chrome Extension, IOS, Android |
| Category | Technology | Productivity |
| Founded | 2008 | 2013 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GitHub Desktop
- Line-level staging
- Branch and merge UI
- Pull request integration
- Enterprise authentication
- Squash and reorder
- Drag cherry-pick
- Co-author attribution
- Editor and shell handoff
Only in Kami
- PDF annotation
- Drawing tools
- Text tools
- Voice comments
- Text-to-speech
- OCR
- Split/merge PDFs
- Video embedding
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GitHub Desktop
- Onboarding designers or technical writers who need to commit to a docs or assets repository without learning the command linenot Kami
- A new engineer's first weeks, where seeing the diff and the branch state visually prevents the common early mistakesnot Kami
- Reviewing a colleague's pull request branch locally with a readable diff before approving itnot Kami
- Small teams standardised entirely on GitHub who want SSO-backed authentication to work without managing personal access tokens by handnot Kami
Kami
- Free document collaboration for individualsnot GitHub Desktop
- Professional document management with advanced toolsnot GitHub Desktop
- Dedicated account management for workplace teamsnot GitHub Desktop
- K-12 and higher education document workflowsnot GitHub Desktop
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GitHub Desktop
- There is no official Linux build; the application ships for Windows and macOS only, and the community fork at shiftkey/desktop that packages it for Linux is maintained separately and lags official releases, so a mixed-OS team cannot standardise on one client.
- Submodules are effectively unsupported: the app shows a submodule change as an opaque single line and gives you no way to initialise, update or navigate into it, so any repository using them needs the terminal anyway.
- History rewriting is limited to squashing and reordering local commits by drag and drop; interactive rebase, fixup chains, editing an old commit's contents and bisect are all absent, which is exactly the set of operations a beginner needs help with most.
- Pull request features only exist for GitHub remotes, so a team on GitLab or Bitbucket gets a plain Git client with an empty pull request pane and no review or checks view at all.
- Commit signing with a key that requires a passphrase generally fails, because the app cannot surface the pinentry prompt, and the resulting error message does not say that is the cause.
- GitHub staffs it lightly compared with its web and CI products, so long-standing feature requests and bugs sit open for years; if you file an issue you should plan around it rather than expect a fix.
Kami
- The free Basic plan exposes only about 10 of the 40 or more tools
- Google Classroom, Schoology, Canvas and Microsoft Teams integrations require the Teacher plan at $149 per year
- School and district licensing including domain wide deployment is custom priced and requires a quote
- Non education users pay separate Workplace plans at $85 or $220 per year rather than the education rate
- A dedicated account manager is only available on the School or District plan
Pricing, plan by plan
GitHub Desktop
Free- FreeFree
- Git repository management
- GitHub integration
- Visual diff tools
Kami
Free- Basic (Free)Free
- 10+ essential tools
- Google Drive and OneDrive integration
- Unlimited collaborators
- Pro$12/month
- All 40+ tools and features
- Unlimited pages and document types
- Priority support
- Work$25/month
- Everything in Pro
- Free onboarding and training
- Dedicated Account Manager
- Teacher Plan$149/year
- All 40+ tools and features
- Full LMS integrations (Classroom, Schoology, Canvas, Teams)
- Free onboarding and training
Which should you pick?
Choose GitHub Desktop if
- You need line-level staging.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos.
- You also want branch and merge ui.
Choose Kami if
- You need pdf annotation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Chrome Extension, IOS, Android.
- You also want drawing tools.
Questions people ask
- Is GitHub Desktop or Kami better?
- Neither clearly leads. GitHub Desktop starts at Free and Kami at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GitHub Desktop or Kami?
- GitHub Desktop starts at Free and Kami at Free.
- Does GitHub Desktop or Kami run on more platforms?
- GitHub Desktop runs on Windows, Macos. Kami runs on Web, Chrome Extension, IOS, Android.
- Can I use GitHub Desktop for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is GitHub Desktop best used for?
- GitHub Desktop is most often used for onboarding designers or technical writers who need to commit to a docs or assets repository without learning the command line, a new engineer's first weeks, where seeing the diff and the branch state visually prevents the common early mistakes, reviewing a colleague's pull request branch locally with a readable diff before approving it, small teams standardised entirely on github who want sso-backed authentication to work without managing personal access tokens by hand. Of those, onboarding designers or technical writers who need to commit to a docs or assets repository without learning the command line and a new engineer's first weeks, where seeing the diff and the branch state visually prevents the common early mistakes are not what Kami is typically brought in for.
- What can GitHub Desktop do that Kami cannot?
- GitHub Desktop covers Line-level staging, Branch and merge UI, Pull request integration, Enterprise authentication. Kami covers PDF annotation, Drawing tools, Text tools, Voice comments.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GitHub Desktop: Is there a Linux version?
Not an official one. GitHub ships Windows and macOS builds only. A community fork, shiftkey/desktop, produces Linux packages, but it is maintained by volunteers and trails the official releases.
Kami: Does Kami offer a free plan and what does it include?
Yes, Kami's free Basic plan includes 10+ essential tools, unlimited collaborators, Google Drive/OneDrive integration, and 1,000+ templates. Full feature access requires Pro or higher tiers.
SourceGitHub Desktop: Does it work with GitLab or Bitbucket?
For plain Git operations, yes: you can clone, commit, push and pull against any remote. The pull request, review and checks features only work against GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise.
Kami: What is the cheapest paid plan for Kami and what does it cost?
Pro plan is $12/month ($85/year when billed annually) and includes all 40+ tools, unlimited pages, and priority support for workplace users.
SourceGitHub Desktop: What does it cost?
Nothing. It is free and the source is published under the MIT licence, and it is separate from any GitHub plan you may or may not pay for.
Kami: Are there Kami plans designed specifically for educators?
Yes, the Teacher plan costs $149/year and includes all 40+ tools, full LMS integrations (Google Classroom, Schoology, Canvas, Teams), free onboarding, and priority support with a 30-day free trial.
SourceGitHub Desktop: Will it handle submodules?
No. Submodule changes appear as an unreadable single-line diff and there are no controls for initialising or updating them. Repositories that use submodules need the command line.
Kami: How much do Kami School or District plans cost?
School and District plans do not publish pricing and require contacting Kami for custom quotes. These plans include domain-wide deployment, dedicated account managers, and full LMS integrations.
SourceGitHub Desktop: Do I still need to learn Git?
For everyday work, no. For recovery, yes. Anything beyond the curated set of operations, including interactive rebase and reflog recovery, happens in the terminal, so a team using it should have at least one person who knows Git properly.
GitHub Desktop: Does it work with GitHub Enterprise Server?
Yes. It signs in to GitHub Enterprise Server and GitHub Enterprise Cloud as well as GitHub.com, and it honours organisations that enforce SAML single sign-on.
Related pages
More on GitHub Desktop
Other head to heads
- GitHub Desktop vs Asana
- GitHub Desktop vs ClickUp
- GitHub Desktop vs Figma
- GitHub Desktop vs Linear
- GitHub Desktop vs Monday.com
- GitHub Desktop vs Dropbox
- GitHub Desktop vs Excalidraw
- GitHub Desktop vs Notion
- GitHub Desktop vs GitLab
- GitHub Desktop vs Coda
- GitHub Desktop vs Postman
- GitHub Desktop vs Whimsical
- GitHub Desktop vs Lovable
- GitHub Desktop vs Lucidchart
- GitHub Desktop vs MongoDB
- GitHub Desktop vs Nagios XI
- GitHub Desktop vs Postgres
- GitHub Desktop vs MongoDB Atlas
- GitHub Desktop vs Nitro PDF
- GitHub Desktop vs Foxit PDF Editor
- GitHub Desktop vs iLovePDF
- GitHub Desktop vs Sejda
- GitHub Desktop vs PDF Expert
- GitHub Desktop vs Google Workspace
- GitHub Desktop vs Gamma
- GitHub Desktop vs FigJam
- GitHub Desktop vs Microsoft OneNote
- GitHub Desktop vs Kahoot
- GitHub Desktop vs RemNote
- GitHub Desktop vs SignWell
- GitHub Desktop vs Bluemail
- GitHub Desktop vs Bring!
- GitHub Desktop vs Canary Mail
- GitHub Desktop vs Fastmail
- GitHub Desktop vs Rows
- GitHub Desktop vs Samsung Food
- Kami vs Asana
- Kami vs ClickUp
- Kami vs Figma
- Kami vs Linear
- Kami vs Monday.com
- Kami vs Dropbox
- Kami vs Excalidraw
- Kami vs Notion
- Kami vs GitLab
- Kami vs Coda
- Kami vs Postman
- Kami vs Whimsical
- Kami vs Lovable
- Kami vs Lucidchart
- Kami vs MongoDB
- Kami vs Nagios XI
- Kami vs Postgres
- Kami vs MongoDB Atlas
- Kami vs Nitro PDF
- Kami vs Foxit PDF Editor
- Kami vs iLovePDF
- Kami vs Sejda
- Kami vs PDF Expert
- Kami vs Google Workspace
- Kami vs Gamma
- Kami vs FigJam
- Kami vs Microsoft OneNote
- Kami vs Kahoot
- Kami vs RemNote
- Kami vs SignWell
- Kami vs Bluemail
- Kami vs Bring!
- Kami vs Canary Mail
- Kami vs Fastmail
- Kami vs Rows
- Kami vs Samsung Food
