Cybersecurity · head to head
Genetec Security Center vs Syft

Genetec Security Center
Cybersecurity
Unified video, access control and licence plate platform sold in perpetual channel licences plus an annual maintenance contract
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Syft
Cybersecurity
Generates a software bill of materials from images, filesystems and archives
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Syft has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Genetec Security Center genetec publishes no pricing and sells only through certified integrators, so buyers cannot benchmark a quote and the same 500-camera design can vary widely in price between integrators.; Syft lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- They diverge on capability: Genetec Security Center covers Omnicast video management, Syft covers Multi-format output.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Genetec Security Center and Syft actually diverge.
| Attribute | Genetec Security Center | Syft |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Web, iOS, Android | macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Genetec Security Center
- Omnicast video management
- Synergis access control
- AutoVu ALPR
- Security Desk
- Federation
- Genetec Clearance
- Mission Control
- Genetec Advantage
Only in Syft
- Multi-format output
- Broad ecosystem coverage
- Binary classifiers
- In-toto attestations
- Library and CLI
- Pairs with Grype
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Genetec Security Center
- An airport unifying video, doors and licence plate recognition under one operator client and one audit trailnot Syft
- A city federating dozens of independently owned camera systems into a regional monitoring centre without taking ownership of themnot Syft
- A campus that refuses to be locked to one camera manufacturer over a fifteen-year refresh cyclenot Syft
- A transit authority needing evidence export with a chain of custody that will survive a court challengenot Syft
Syft
- Producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires onenot Genetec Security Center
- Feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directlynot Genetec Security Center
- Recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quicklynot Genetec Security Center
- Public sector work where an SBOM is a contractual deliverablenot Genetec Security Center
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Genetec Security Center
- Genetec publishes no pricing and sells only through certified integrators, so buyers cannot benchmark a quote and the same 500-camera design can vary widely in price between integrators.
- Genetec Advantage is an annual maintenance agreement commonly quoted at 18 to 22 percent of licence value, so a perpetual licence is not a one-off cost, and letting it lapse freezes the system on its current version and stops support.
- Licensing is per camera channel, so adding cameras is a licence purchase every time and organisations that expand a site by a hundred cameras discover the software line grows in step with the hardware.
- It is a Windows server platform that has to be sized, patched, backed up and eventually migrated, so the real cost includes an IT estate and an integrator, which puts it out of reach of organisations without a security team.
- Operator competence is a genuine dependency: Security Desk is dense, and sites that deploy it without training end up using a fraction of the platform they paid for while still paying full maintenance on all of it.
Syft
- Lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- Fidelity varies sharply by ecosystem. Conan for C and C++, Haskell and Terraform get cataloguer support with no licence data, no dependency relationships and no file ownership, so a C and C++ shop gets the least from it.
- Binary classification yields no licence or dependency metadata, and vendored or statically linked code is exactly where supply chain risk hides, so the blind spot and the risk overlap.
- Incorrect CPE values and CPE collisions are recorded as open issues, and since Grype matches on CPE and PURL, an inventory error becomes a false negative in the security report downstream.
- An inventory is not a risk assessment. Even a perfect bill of materials says a vulnerable version is present, never that the vulnerable function is called, and the triage burden lands entirely on the reader.
Pricing, plan by plan
Genetec Security Center
On request- Security Center$undefined/year
- Perpetual video channel licences, priced per camera
- Standard, Professional and Enterprise editions
- Access control and ALPR modules licensed separately
Syft
Free- SyftFree
- Apache-2.0
- No usage limits
- Community support
- Anchore Enterprise$undefined/year
- Policy enforcement and reporting
- Federal and commercial tiers
- Pricing not published, quoted on request
Which should you pick?
Choose Genetec Security Center if
- You need omnicast video management.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want synergis access control.
Choose Syft if
- You need multi-format output.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want broad ecosystem coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is Genetec Security Center or Syft better?
- Neither clearly leads. Genetec Security Center starts at On request and Syft at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Genetec Security Center or Syft?
- Syft has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Genetec Security Center and Free for Syft.
- Does Genetec Security Center or Syft run on more platforms?
- Genetec Security Center runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android. Syft runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Syft for free?
- Yes. Syft has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Genetec Security Center starts at On request.
- What is Genetec Security Center best used for?
- Genetec Security Center is most often used for an airport unifying video, doors and licence plate recognition under one operator client and one audit trail, a city federating dozens of independently owned camera systems into a regional monitoring centre without taking ownership of them, a campus that refuses to be locked to one camera manufacturer over a fifteen-year refresh cycle, a transit authority needing evidence export with a chain of custody that will survive a court challenge. Of those, an airport unifying video, doors and licence plate recognition under one operator client and one audit trail and a city federating dozens of independently owned camera systems into a regional monitoring centre without taking ownership of them are not what Syft is typically brought in for.
- What can Genetec Security Center do that Syft cannot?
- Genetec Security Center covers Omnicast video management, Synergis access control, AutoVu ALPR, Security Desk. Syft covers Multi-format output, Broad ecosystem coverage, Binary classifiers, In-toto attestations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Genetec Security Center: How much does Genetec cost per camera?
Genetec does not publish prices. Independent estimates put on-premises video channel licences in the region of 150 to 250 US dollars per camera by edition, plus annual Advantage maintenance at roughly 18 to 22 percent of licence value.
Syft: Does Syft find vulnerabilities?
No. It produces an inventory. Grype, from the same company, matches that inventory against vulnerability feeds. They are separate tools and the distinction is frequently lost.
Genetec Security Center: Is Genetec Advantage optional?
Technically yes, but without it you get no version upgrades and no support, and reinstating it later usually means paying for the lapsed period.
Syft: Does anything in the Anchore stack do reachability analysis?
No. Neither Syft, Grype nor the commercial Anchore platform performs call graph or reachability analysis, so none of them tells you whether a vulnerable code path is actually invoked.
Genetec Security Center: Can I buy Genetec directly?
No. It is sold exclusively through certified integrators, who also do the design and commissioning.
Syft: Is it a CNCF or OpenSSF project?
No. It is single-vendor open source owned by Anchore, with no foundation governance. That is a different licence risk profile from Sigstore.
Genetec Security Center: Does it work with any camera?
It supports thousands of models across manufacturers, which is its core advantage over camera-maker software, though NDAA-restricted brands should be checked against your own procurement rules.
Syft: What does Anchore Enterprise cost?
Not published. The pricing page is contact-sales only, with named but unpriced commercial and federal tiers.
Syft: How do I know my SBOM is complete?
You largely cannot, which is the honest answer. Silent partial parsing is a known open defect, so a bill of materials used for compliance should be spot-checked against a known dependency list.
Related pages
More on Genetec Security Center
Other head to heads
- Genetec Security Center vs Dahua Technology
- Genetec Security Center vs Hanwha Vision
- Genetec Security Center vs Camio
- Genetec Security Center vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Genetec Security Center vs March Networks
- Genetec Security Center vs Rhombus Systems
- Genetec Security Center vs Milestone XProtect
- Genetec Security Center vs Salient CompleteView
- Genetec Security Center vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Genetec Security Center vs Motorola Vigilant
- Genetec Security Center vs Spot AI
- Genetec Security Center vs Ping Identity
- Genetec Security Center vs Malwarebytes
- Genetec Security Center vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Genetec Security Center vs Netwrix
- Genetec Security Center vs NordVPN
- Genetec Security Center vs Omada Identity
- Genetec Security Center vs Microsoft Intune
- Genetec Security Center vs Cosign
- Genetec Security Center vs Sigstore
- Genetec Security Center vs Trivy
- Genetec Security Center vs Chainguard
- Genetec Security Center vs Metasploit
- Genetec Security Center vs Wireshark
- Genetec Security Center vs Semgrep
- Genetec Security Center vs Legit Security
- Genetec Security Center vs OWASP ZAP
- Genetec Security Center vs HashiCorp Vault
- Genetec Security Center vs Bitwarden
- Genetec Security Center vs Infisical
- Genetec Security Center vs Tenable Nessus
- Genetec Security Center vs Transmit Security
- Genetec Security Center vs TrustArc
- Genetec Security Center vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Genetec Security Center vs VMware Carbon Black
- Syft vs Dahua Technology
- Syft vs Hanwha Vision
- Syft vs Camio
- Syft vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Syft vs March Networks
- Syft vs Rhombus Systems
- Syft vs Milestone XProtect
- Syft vs Salient CompleteView
- Syft vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Syft vs Motorola Vigilant
- Syft vs Spot AI
- Syft vs Ping Identity
- Syft vs Malwarebytes
- Syft vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Syft vs Netwrix
- Syft vs NordVPN
- Syft vs Omada Identity
- Syft vs Microsoft Intune
- Syft vs Cosign
- Syft vs Sigstore
- Syft vs Trivy
- Syft vs Chainguard
- Syft vs Metasploit
- Syft vs Wireshark
- Syft vs Semgrep
- Syft vs Legit Security
- Syft vs OWASP ZAP
- Syft vs HashiCorp Vault
- Syft vs Bitwarden
- Syft vs Infisical
- Syft vs Tenable Nessus
- Syft vs Transmit Security
- Syft vs TrustArc
- Syft vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Syft vs VMware Carbon Black
