Cybersecurity · head to head
Hanwha Vision vs Syft

Hanwha Vision
Cybersecurity
Korean camera maker whose Wisenet WAVE VMS licences are perpetual per channel with no annual renewal
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Syft
Cybersecurity
Generates a software bill of materials from images, filesystems and archives
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Syft has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Hanwha Vision nDAA compliance is confirmed per model and per bill of materials rather than across the brand, and TAA status depends on whether a specific unit was made in Korea or Vietnam, so a buyer with procurement obligations must get both stated on the quote rather than relying on a brand-level claim.; Syft lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- They diverge on capability: Hanwha Vision covers Wisenet WAVE VMS, Syft covers Multi-format output.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hanwha Vision and Syft actually diverge.
| Attribute | Hanwha Vision | Syft |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux, Web, iOS, Android | macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hanwha Vision
- Wisenet WAVE VMS
- On-camera AI
- NDAA and TAA positioning
- Multi-site management
- Open platform
- Wisenet cameras and recorders
- Cybersecurity hardening
- Integration licences
Only in Syft
- Multi-format output
- Broad ecosystem coverage
- Binary classifiers
- In-toto attestations
- Library and CLI
- Pairs with Grype
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hanwha Vision
- A federal agency or federal contractor whose procurement rules exclude Section 889 covered manufacturersnot Syft
- A school district that wants a fixed one-time software cost rather than a per-camera monthly subscriptionnot Syft
- A site running 200 cameras for a decade where a cloud subscription would cost several times a perpetual licencenot Syft
- An integrator standardising on one manufacturer for cameras, recorders and VMS to simplify supportnot Syft
Syft
- Producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires onenot Hanwha Vision
- Feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directlynot Hanwha Vision
- Recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quicklynot Hanwha Vision
- Public sector work where an SBOM is a contractual deliverablenot Hanwha Vision
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hanwha Vision
- NDAA compliance is confirmed per model and per bill of materials rather than across the brand, and TAA status depends on whether a specific unit was made in Korea or Vietnam, so a buyer with procurement obligations must get both stated on the quote rather than relying on a brand-level claim.
- Perpetual licences mean you own the servers, storage and patching, so the cost avoided on subscription reappears as IT labour and a hardware refresh every five to seven years.
- Hanwha publishes no list pricing and sells through distributors, so the perpetual-versus-subscription comparison it wins on paper still requires a distributor quote to verify.
- Wisenet WAVE is a solid mid-market VMS but does not match Genetec or Milestone on enterprise features such as federation across independently owned systems, scripted operator procedures or deep access control unification.
- Hanwha Vision is part of Hanwha Group, a large Korean conglomerate spanning defence, chemicals and finance, so the video business is one line among many and roadmap priority is set at a corporate level well above the security division.
Syft
- Lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- Fidelity varies sharply by ecosystem. Conan for C and C++, Haskell and Terraform get cataloguer support with no licence data, no dependency relationships and no file ownership, so a C and C++ shop gets the least from it.
- Binary classification yields no licence or dependency metadata, and vendored or statically linked code is exactly where supply chain risk hides, so the blind spot and the risk overlap.
- Incorrect CPE values and CPE collisions are recorded as open issues, and since Grype matches on CPE and PURL, an inventory error becomes a false negative in the security report downstream.
- An inventory is not a risk assessment. Even a perfect bill of materials says a vulnerable version is present, never that the vulnerable function is called, and the triage burden lands entirely on the reader.
Pricing, plan by plan
Hanwha Vision
On request- Wisenet WAVE channel licence$undefined/year
- Perpetual per-channel licence that does not expire once activated
- No annual renewal fee to keep the system running
- Sold singly and in 4, 8, 16, 24 and 48 channel bundles
Syft
Free- SyftFree
- Apache-2.0
- No usage limits
- Community support
- Anchore Enterprise$undefined/year
- Policy enforcement and reporting
- Federal and commercial tiers
- Pricing not published, quoted on request
Which should you pick?
Choose Hanwha Vision if
- You need wisenet wave vms.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want on-camera ai.
Choose Syft if
- You need multi-format output.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want broad ecosystem coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is Hanwha Vision or Syft better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hanwha Vision starts at On request and Syft at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hanwha Vision or Syft?
- Syft has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Hanwha Vision and Free for Syft.
- Does Hanwha Vision or Syft run on more platforms?
- Hanwha Vision runs on Windows, Linux, Web, iOS, Android. Syft runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Syft for free?
- Yes. Syft has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Hanwha Vision starts at On request.
- What is Hanwha Vision best used for?
- Hanwha Vision is most often used for a federal agency or federal contractor whose procurement rules exclude section 889 covered manufacturers, a school district that wants a fixed one-time software cost rather than a per-camera monthly subscription, a site running 200 cameras for a decade where a cloud subscription would cost several times a perpetual licence, an integrator standardising on one manufacturer for cameras, recorders and vms to simplify support. Of those, a federal agency or federal contractor whose procurement rules exclude section 889 covered manufacturers and a school district that wants a fixed one-time software cost rather than a per-camera monthly subscription are not what Syft is typically brought in for.
- What can Hanwha Vision do that Syft cannot?
- Hanwha Vision covers Wisenet WAVE VMS, On-camera AI, NDAA and TAA positioning, Multi-site management. Syft covers Multi-format output, Broad ecosystem coverage, Binary classifiers, In-toto attestations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hanwha Vision: Is Hanwha Vision NDAA compliant?
Hanwha is a South Korean manufacturer and is not among the Section 889 covered entities, which are Hikvision, Dahua, Huawei, ZTE and Hytera, and its cameras do not use banned Chinese system-on-chip processors. Confirm compliance per model on the quote.
Syft: Does Syft find vulnerabilities?
No. It produces an inventory. Grype, from the same company, matches that inventory against vulnerability feeds. They are separate tools and the distinction is frequently lost.
Hanwha Vision: Are Wisenet WAVE licences subscriptions?
No. Channel licences are perpetual and do not expire once activated, with no annual renewal fee.
Syft: Does anything in the Anchore stack do reachability analysis?
No. Neither Syft, Grype nor the commercial Anchore platform performs call graph or reachability analysis, so none of them tells you whether a vulnerable code path is actually invoked.
Hanwha Vision: Is Wisenet WAVE the same as Nx Witness?
It is built on the Network Optix platform, so the two share a common core, with Hanwha adding its own camera integration and support.
Syft: Is it a CNCF or OpenSSF project?
No. It is single-vendor open source owned by Anchore, with no foundation governance. That is a different licence risk profile from Sigstore.
Hanwha Vision: Is Hanwha TAA compliant?
Many models are, manufactured in South Korea and Vietnam, but TAA is a per-unit question tied to manufacturing origin, so it must be verified model by model.
Syft: What does Anchore Enterprise cost?
Not published. The pricing page is contact-sales only, with named but unpriced commercial and federal tiers.
Syft: How do I know my SBOM is complete?
You largely cannot, which is the honest answer. Silent partial parsing is a known open defect, so a bill of materials used for compliance should be spot-checked against a known dependency list.
Related pages
More on Hanwha Vision
Other head to heads
- Hanwha Vision vs Dahua Technology
- Hanwha Vision vs Genetec Security Center
- Hanwha Vision vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Hanwha Vision vs Milestone XProtect
- Hanwha Vision vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Hanwha Vision vs Salient CompleteView
- Hanwha Vision vs March Networks
- Hanwha Vision vs Envysion
- Hanwha Vision vs Rhombus Systems
- Hanwha Vision vs Camio
- Hanwha Vision vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Hanwha Vision vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Hanwha Vision vs Sophos Intercept X
- Hanwha Vision vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Hanwha Vision vs Sticky Password
- Hanwha Vision vs Stytch
- Hanwha Vision vs Surfshark
- Hanwha Vision vs Tanium
- Hanwha Vision vs Cosign
- Hanwha Vision vs Sigstore
- Hanwha Vision vs Trivy
- Hanwha Vision vs Chainguard
- Hanwha Vision vs Metasploit
- Hanwha Vision vs Wireshark
- Hanwha Vision vs Semgrep
- Hanwha Vision vs Legit Security
- Hanwha Vision vs OWASP ZAP
- Hanwha Vision vs HashiCorp Vault
- Hanwha Vision vs Bitwarden
- Hanwha Vision vs Infisical
- Hanwha Vision vs Tenable Nessus
- Hanwha Vision vs Transmit Security
- Hanwha Vision vs TrustArc
- Hanwha Vision vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Hanwha Vision vs VMware Carbon Black
- Syft vs Dahua Technology
- Syft vs Genetec Security Center
- Syft vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Syft vs Milestone XProtect
- Syft vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Syft vs Salient CompleteView
- Syft vs March Networks
- Syft vs Envysion
- Syft vs Rhombus Systems
- Syft vs Camio
- Syft vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Syft vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Syft vs Sophos Intercept X
- Syft vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Syft vs Sticky Password
- Syft vs Stytch
- Syft vs Surfshark
- Syft vs Tanium
- Syft vs Cosign
- Syft vs Sigstore
- Syft vs Trivy
- Syft vs Chainguard
- Syft vs Metasploit
- Syft vs Wireshark
- Syft vs Semgrep
- Syft vs Legit Security
- Syft vs OWASP ZAP
- Syft vs HashiCorp Vault
- Syft vs Bitwarden
- Syft vs Infisical
- Syft vs Tenable Nessus
- Syft vs Transmit Security
- Syft vs TrustArc
- Syft vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Syft vs VMware Carbon Black
