Cybersecurity · head to head
Malwarebytes vs Syft

Syft
Cybersecurity
Generates a software bill of materials from images, filesystems and archives
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Malwarebytes pricing page information is incomplete or dynamically loaded, making transparent pricing comparison difficult for potential customers; Syft lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- They diverge on capability: Malwarebytes covers Malware detection & removal, Syft covers Multi-format output.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Malwarebytes and Syft actually diverge.
| Attribute | Malwarebytes | Syft |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker |
| Founded | 2008 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Malwarebytes
- Malware detection & removal
- Ransomware protection
- Real-time protection
- Anti-exploit
- Anti-phishing
- Browser Guard
- VPN
- Brute Force Protection
Only in Syft
- Multi-format output
- Broad ecosystem coverage
- Binary classifiers
- In-toto attestations
- Library and CLI
- Pairs with Grype
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Malwarebytes
- Budget-conscious users performing manual scans via free versionnot Syft
- Organisations needing real-time malware and ransomware protection via Premium subscriptionnot Syft
- Users combining antivirus with privacy via Premium plus Privacy VPN bundlenot Syft
Syft
- Producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires onenot Malwarebytes
- Feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directlynot Malwarebytes
- Recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quicklynot Malwarebytes
- Public sector work where an SBOM is a contractual deliverablenot Malwarebytes
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Malwarebytes
- Pricing page information is incomplete or dynamically loaded, making transparent pricing comparison difficult for potential customers
- Specific price amounts for different tiers (Individual, Family, Small business) are not clearly displayed on the main pricing page
- No mention of free tier or free trial duration on pricing page, unclear what features are included in each tier
Syft
- Lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- Fidelity varies sharply by ecosystem. Conan for C and C++, Haskell and Terraform get cataloguer support with no licence data, no dependency relationships and no file ownership, so a C and C++ shop gets the least from it.
- Binary classification yields no licence or dependency metadata, and vendored or statically linked code is exactly where supply chain risk hides, so the blind spot and the risk overlap.
- Incorrect CPE values and CPE collisions are recorded as open issues, and since Grype matches on CPE and PURL, an inventory error becomes a false negative in the security report downstream.
- An inventory is not a risk assessment. Even a perfect bill of materials says a vulnerable version is present, never that the vulnerable function is called, and the triage burden lands entirely on the reader.
Pricing, plan by plan
Malwarebytes
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Malwarebytes review.
Syft
Free- SyftFree
- Apache-2.0
- No usage limits
- Community support
- Anchore Enterprise$undefined/year
- Policy enforcement and reporting
- Federal and commercial tiers
- Pricing not published, quoted on request
Which should you pick?
Choose Malwarebytes if
- You need malware detection & removal.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- You also want ransomware protection.
Choose Syft if
- You need multi-format output.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want broad ecosystem coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is Malwarebytes or Syft better?
- Neither clearly leads. Malwarebytes starts at Free and Syft at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Malwarebytes or Syft?
- Malwarebytes starts at Free and Syft at Free.
- Does Malwarebytes or Syft run on more platforms?
- Malwarebytes runs on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android. Syft runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Malwarebytes for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Malwarebytes best used for?
- Malwarebytes is most often used for budget-conscious users performing manual scans via free version, organisations needing real-time malware and ransomware protection via premium subscription, users combining antivirus with privacy via premium plus privacy vpn bundle. Of those, budget-conscious users performing manual scans via free version and organisations needing real-time malware and ransomware protection via premium subscription are not what Syft is typically brought in for.
- What can Malwarebytes do that Syft cannot?
- Malwarebytes covers Malware detection & removal, Ransomware protection, Real-time protection, Anti-exploit. Syft covers Multi-format output, Broad ecosystem coverage, Binary classifiers, In-toto attestations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Malwarebytes: What is the refund policy for Malwarebytes subscriptions?
Malwarebytes offers a 60-day money back guarantee on all purchases. This allows customers to test the product across their devices (PC, Mac, Android, iOS) with full refund protection if unsatisfied.
SourceSyft: Does Syft find vulnerabilities?
No. It produces an inventory. Grype, from the same company, matches that inventory against vulnerability feeds. They are separate tools and the distinction is frequently lost.
Malwarebytes: What platforms does Malwarebytes support?
Malwarebytes works on Windows PC, macOS, Android, and iOS. Multi-platform protection is available across all subscription tiers including Individual, Family, Small business, and Standard single device options.
SourceSyft: Does anything in the Anchore stack do reachability analysis?
No. Neither Syft, Grype nor the commercial Anchore platform performs call graph or reachability analysis, so none of them tells you whether a vulnerable code path is actually invoked.
Malwarebytes: What is included in customer support with Malwarebytes?
Free customer support is included with all Malwarebytes subscription tiers. The product is backed by a 60-day money back guarantee for risk-free purchasing.
SourceSyft: Is it a CNCF or OpenSSF project?
No. It is single-vendor open source owned by Anchore, with no foundation governance. That is a different licence risk profile from Sigstore.
Syft: What does Anchore Enterprise cost?
Not published. The pricing page is contact-sales only, with named but unpriced commercial and federal tiers.
Syft: How do I know my SBOM is complete?
You largely cannot, which is the honest answer. Silent partial parsing is a known open defect, so a bill of materials used for compliance should be spot-checked against a known dependency list.
Related pages
More on Malwarebytes
Other head to heads
- Malwarebytes vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Malwarebytes vs Norton 360
- Malwarebytes vs 1Password
- Malwarebytes vs LastPass
- Malwarebytes vs Sophos Intercept X
- Malwarebytes vs Avast One
- Malwarebytes vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Malwarebytes vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Malwarebytes vs SentinelOne
- Malwarebytes vs Surfshark
- Malwarebytes vs McAfee Total Protection
- Malwarebytes vs Beyond Identity
- Malwarebytes vs Camio
- Malwarebytes vs Cisco Duo
- Malwarebytes vs Clerk
- Malwarebytes vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Malwarebytes vs iDenfy
- Malwarebytes vs IDnow
- Malwarebytes vs Cosign
- Malwarebytes vs Sigstore
- Malwarebytes vs Trivy
- Malwarebytes vs Chainguard
- Malwarebytes vs Metasploit
- Malwarebytes vs Wireshark
- Malwarebytes vs Semgrep
- Malwarebytes vs Legit Security
- Malwarebytes vs OWASP ZAP
- Malwarebytes vs HashiCorp Vault
- Malwarebytes vs Bitwarden
- Malwarebytes vs Infisical
- Malwarebytes vs Tenable Nessus
- Malwarebytes vs Transmit Security
- Malwarebytes vs TrustArc
- Malwarebytes vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Malwarebytes vs VMware Carbon Black
- Syft vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Syft vs Norton 360
- Syft vs 1Password
- Syft vs LastPass
- Syft vs Sophos Intercept X
- Syft vs Avast One
- Syft vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Syft vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Syft vs SentinelOne
- Syft vs Surfshark
- Syft vs McAfee Total Protection
- Syft vs Beyond Identity
- Syft vs Camio
- Syft vs Cisco Duo
- Syft vs Clerk
- Syft vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Syft vs iDenfy
- Syft vs IDnow
- Syft vs Cosign
- Syft vs Sigstore
- Syft vs Trivy
- Syft vs Chainguard
- Syft vs Metasploit
- Syft vs Wireshark
- Syft vs Semgrep
- Syft vs Legit Security
- Syft vs OWASP ZAP
- Syft vs HashiCorp Vault
- Syft vs Bitwarden
- Syft vs Infisical
- Syft vs Tenable Nessus
- Syft vs Transmit Security
- Syft vs TrustArc
- Syft vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Syft vs VMware Carbon Black

