Developer Tools · head to head
Garden vs Heroku

Garden
Developer Tools
Kubernetes development and testing automation with shared caching, now owned by Incredibuild
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Garden has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Garden incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it.; Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- They diverge on capability: Garden covers Action graph, Heroku covers Git-based deployment.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Garden and Heroku actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Garden
- Action graph
- Shared result caching
- Remote Kubernetes environments
- In-cluster builds
- Same config everywhere
- Hot reload sync
- Helm and Kustomize support
- Templating
Only in Heroku
- Git-based deployment
- Buildpacks
- Dynos (containers)
- Add-ons marketplace
- Postgres database
- Environment variables
- Logging
- API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Garden
- A platform team whose integration test suite takes longer than the coffee break and needs caching to cut the loopnot Heroku
- An organisation with thirty or more services on Kubernetes where docker-compose no longer approximates productionnot Heroku
- Giving every developer an ephemeral namespace instead of queuing for one shared staging environmentnot Heroku
- Running the identical build and test definition locally and in CI so failures reproduce on a laptopnot Heroku
Heroku
- Application hostingnot Garden
- Database as a servicenot Garden
- CI/CD pipelinesnot Garden
- API deploymentnot Garden
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Garden
- Incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it.
- It is tightly bound to Kubernetes, so teams running on ECS, Nomad, plain VMs or serverless get little from it and would need a different tool entirely.
- The YAML action graph is a real configuration surface: a large monorepo needs someone to own and maintain Garden config as a first-class artefact, which is a standing platform-engineering cost.
- Shared remote environments mean every developer needs cluster access and a cost allocation model, so cloud spend rises and namespace sprawl becomes a thing you have to police.
- Caching correctness depends on declaring dependencies accurately; an under-declared action will serve a stale cached pass and hide a genuine test failure, which is a hard class of bug to notice.
Heroku
- There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
- Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
- Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
- Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
- Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill
Pricing, plan by plan
Garden
Free- Garden open sourceFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed CLI
- Full action graph and caching
- Self-managed clusters
- Commercial tier$undefined/year
- Hosted caching and team features
- Support and onboarding
- Pricing no longer published since the Incredibuild acquisition
Heroku
$5/month- Eco Dyno$5/month
- 0.5 GB RAM
- Git/Docker deploy
- Custom domains
- Basic Dyno$7/month
- 0.5 GB RAM
- Always-on
- Free SSL
- Standard-1X Dyno$25/month
- 0.5 GB RAM
- Horizontal scaling
- App metrics
- Standard-2X Dyno$50/month
- 1 GB RAM
- Horizontal scaling
- App metrics
Which should you pick?
Choose Garden if
- You need action graph.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes.
- You also want shared result caching.
Choose Heroku if
- You need git-based deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Workers.
- You also want buildpacks.
Questions people ask
- Is Garden or Heroku better?
- Neither clearly leads. Garden starts at Free and Heroku at $5/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Garden or Heroku?
- Garden has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Garden and $5/month for Heroku.
- Does Garden or Heroku run on more platforms?
- Garden runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes. Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers.
- Can I use Garden for free?
- Yes. Garden has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Heroku starts at $5/month.
- What is Garden best used for?
- Garden is most often used for a platform team whose integration test suite takes longer than the coffee break and needs caching to cut the loop, an organisation with thirty or more services on kubernetes where docker-compose no longer approximates production, giving every developer an ephemeral namespace instead of queuing for one shared staging environment, running the identical build and test definition locally and in ci so failures reproduce on a laptop. Of those, a platform team whose integration test suite takes longer than the coffee break and needs caching to cut the loop and an organisation with thirty or more services on kubernetes where docker-compose no longer approximates production are not what Heroku is typically brought in for.
- What can Garden do that Heroku cannot?
- Garden covers Action graph, Shared result caching, Remote Kubernetes environments, In-cluster builds. Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Garden: Is Garden still maintained?
The open source project remains on GitHub under Incredibuild ownership, but the commercial pricing page redirects to the docs and there is no public paid offer.
Heroku: How much does Heroku cost?
Heroku dyno pricing starts at $5 per month USD for the Eco tier (with 30-minute inactivity sleep), $7 per month for Basic (always-on), and scales up to $1,500 per month for Performance-2XL with 126 GB RAM.
SourceGarden: Do I need Kubernetes?
Effectively yes. Garden is built around Kubernetes environments and offers little to teams on other runtimes.
Heroku: What is the cheapest always-on Heroku plan?
The Basic Dyno at $7 per month USD is Heroku's cheapest always-on container option. It provides 0.5 GB RAM, free SSL, and support for 10 process types.
SourceGarden: Does it replace my CI system?
No. It runs inside GitHub Actions, GitLab CI or similar and speeds up what those pipelines execute.
Heroku: How is Heroku Postgres priced?
Heroku Postgres Essential tier (shared resources) starts at $5-$20 per month for 1-32 GB disk. Standard tier (dedicated) ranges $50-$12,000 per month. Premium, Private, Shield, and Advanced tiers offer higher performance at corresponding prices.
SourceGarden: What is the actual saving?
It comes from skipping builds and tests whose inputs have not changed, so the benefit scales with how many services you have and how often only a few change.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Garden vs Okteto
- Garden vs Ansible
- Garden vs Depot
- Garden vs Earthly
- Garden vs Tilt
- Garden vs WarpBuild
- Garden vs Nix
- Garden vs Blacksmith
- Garden vs Namespace
- Garden vs ConfigCat
- Garden vs OpsLevel
- Garden vs Bazel
- Garden vs Visual Studio
- Garden vs Warp
- Garden vs Xlinesoft
- Garden vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Garden vs GNU Emacs
- Garden vs Keil MDK
- Garden vs Coolify
- Garden vs Neon
- Garden vs Dokku
- Garden vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Garden vs DigitalOcean
- Garden vs Grafana Cloud
- Garden vs Render
- Garden vs Porter
- Garden vs SST
- Garden vs Encore
- Garden vs Zeabur
- Garden vs Railway
- Garden vs Rook
- Garden vs Serverless Framework
- Garden vs Vagrant
- Garden vs VictoriaMetrics
- Garden vs Vultr
- Heroku vs Okteto
- Heroku vs Ansible
- Heroku vs Depot
- Heroku vs Earthly
- Heroku vs Tilt
- Heroku vs WarpBuild
- Heroku vs Nix
- Heroku vs Blacksmith
- Heroku vs Namespace
- Heroku vs ConfigCat
- Heroku vs OpsLevel
- Heroku vs Bazel
- Heroku vs Visual Studio
- Heroku vs Warp
- Heroku vs Xlinesoft
- Heroku vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Heroku vs GNU Emacs
- Heroku vs Keil MDK
- Heroku vs Coolify
- Heroku vs Neon
- Heroku vs Dokku
- Heroku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Heroku vs DigitalOcean
- Heroku vs Grafana Cloud
- Heroku vs Render
- Heroku vs Porter
- Heroku vs SST
- Heroku vs Encore
- Heroku vs Zeabur
- Heroku vs Railway
- Heroku vs Rook
- Heroku vs Serverless Framework
- Heroku vs Vagrant
- Heroku vs VictoriaMetrics
- Heroku vs Vultr

