Software · head to head
Heroku vs Vagrant
The short version
- Only Vagrant has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month; Vagrant vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- They diverge on capability: Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Vagrant covers Box management.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Heroku and Vagrant actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Heroku
- Git-based deployment
- Buildpacks
- Dynos (containers)
- Add-ons marketplace
- Postgres database
- Environment variables
- Logging
- API
Only in Vagrant
- Box management
- Provider support
- Multi-machine setups
- Provisioners
- Networking
- Synced folders
- Snapshots
- Plugins
Both cover
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Heroku
- Deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administrationnot Vagrant
- Running managed Postgres, Redis and Kafka as attached data servicesnot Vagrant
- Isolated production environments in a Private Space for regulated workloadsnot Vagrant
Vagrant
- Reproducible local development environments defined in a Vagrantfilenot Heroku
- Provisioning identical VMs across VirtualBox, VMware and Hyper-V for a teamnot Heroku
- Sandboxing multi-machine setups on a developer laptopnot Heroku
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Heroku
- There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
- Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
- Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
- Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
- Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill
Vagrant
- Vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Vagrant to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Vagrant
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published
- Uses that fall outside the Additional Use Grant require a separately negotiated licence from the licensor
Pricing, plan by plan
Heroku
$7/month- Hobby$7/month
- 512MB RAM
- Shared CPU
- 1 web dyno
- Standard$50/month
- 512MB RAM
- Dedicated CPU
- Automatic scaling
Vagrant
Free- Open SourceFree
- Development environment provisioning
- Multiple providers
- Provisioner support
Which should you pick?
Choose Heroku if
- You need git-based deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Workers.
- You also want buildpacks.
Choose Vagrant if
- You need box management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want provider support.
Questions people ask
- Is Heroku or Vagrant better?
- Neither clearly leads. Heroku starts at $7/month and Vagrant at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Heroku or Vagrant?
- Vagrant has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $7/month for Heroku and Free for Vagrant.
- Does Heroku or Vagrant run on more platforms?
- Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers. Vagrant runs on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- Can I use Vagrant for free?
- Yes. Vagrant has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Heroku starts at $7/month.
- What is Heroku best used for?
- Heroku is most often used for deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration, running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services, isolated production environments in a private space for regulated workloads. Of those, deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration and running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services are not what Vagrant is typically brought in for.
- What can Heroku do that Vagrant cannot?
- Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace. Vagrant covers Box management, Provider support, Multi-machine setups, Provisioners. Both handle Cloud deployment.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Heroku vs Grafana Cloud
- Heroku vs Neon
- Heroku vs DigitalOcean
- Heroku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Heroku vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Heroku vs Deno Deploy
- Heroku vs Hetzner Cloud
- Heroku vs Linode
- Heroku vs Packer
- Heroku vs Pulumi
- Heroku vs Render
- Heroku vs Upstash
- Heroku vs Vultr
- Heroku vs Akamai
- Heroku vs Alibaba Cloud
- Heroku vs Chef
- Heroku vs Contabo
- Vagrant vs Grafana Cloud
- Vagrant vs Neon
- Vagrant vs DigitalOcean
- Vagrant vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vagrant vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Vagrant vs Deno Deploy
- Vagrant vs Hetzner Cloud
- Vagrant vs Linode
- Vagrant vs Packer
- Vagrant vs Pulumi
- Vagrant vs Render
- Vagrant vs Upstash
- Vagrant vs Vultr
- Vagrant vs Akamai
- Vagrant vs Alibaba Cloud
- Vagrant vs Chef
- Vagrant vs Contabo


