Cloud & Infrastructure · head to head
Heroku vs Vultr
The short version
- Only Vultr has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month; Vultr vultr Cloud Compute pricing as captured 31 December 2022 started at $5/month (1 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 25GB storage, 1TB transfer), scaling to $10/month and $20/month with more vCPU/RAM/storage; bandwidth overage billed at $0.01 to $0.05 per GB depending on plan
- They diverge on capability: Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Vultr covers Cloud servers.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Heroku and Vultr actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud & Infrastructure).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Heroku
- Git-based deployment
- Buildpacks
- Dynos (containers)
- Add-ons marketplace
- Postgres database
- Environment variables
- Logging
- GitHub
Only in Vultr
- Cloud servers
- Bare metal servers
- Block storage
- Object storage
- Load balancers
- Kubernetes
- Firewalls
- Private networks
Both cover
- API
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Heroku
- Deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administrationnot Vultr
- Running managed Postgres, Redis and Kafka as attached data servicesnot Vultr
- Isolated production environments in a Private Space for regulated workloadsnot Vultr
Vultr
- High performance computingnot Heroku
- Game serversnot Heroku
- Streamingnot Heroku
- Database hostingnot Heroku
- Application serversnot Heroku
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Heroku
- There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
- Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
- Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
- Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
- Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill
Vultr
- Vultr Cloud Compute pricing as captured 31 December 2022 started at $5/month (1 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 25GB storage, 1TB transfer), scaling to $10/month and $20/month with more vCPU/RAM/storage; bandwidth overage billed at $0.01 to $0.05 per GB depending on plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Heroku
$7/month- Hobby$7/month
- 512MB RAM
- Shared CPU
- 1 web dyno
- Standard$50/month
- 512MB RAM
- Dedicated CPU
- Automatic scaling
Vultr
Free- Cloud Compute$2.5/month
- 512MB RAM
- 10GB SSD
- 500GB bandwidth
- Bare Metal$32/month
- Dedicated hardware
- High performance
- Full root access
Which should you pick?
Choose Heroku if
- You need git-based deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Workers.
- You also want buildpacks.
Choose Vultr if
- You need cloud servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli.
- You also want bare metal servers.
Questions people ask
- Is Heroku or Vultr better?
- Neither clearly leads. Heroku starts at $7/month and Vultr at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Heroku or Vultr?
- Vultr has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $7/month for Heroku and Free for Vultr.
- Does Heroku or Vultr run on more platforms?
- Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers. Vultr runs on Web, Api, Cli.
- Can I use Vultr for free?
- Yes. Vultr has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Heroku starts at $7/month.
- What is Heroku best used for?
- Heroku is most often used for deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration, running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services, isolated production environments in a private space for regulated workloads. Of those, deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration and running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services are not what Vultr is typically brought in for.
- What can Heroku do that Vultr cannot?
- Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace. Vultr covers Cloud servers, Bare metal servers, Block storage, Object storage. Both handle API, Cloud deployment, Web support, Api support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Heroku vs Grafana Cloud
- Heroku vs Neon
- Heroku vs DigitalOcean
- Heroku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Heroku vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Heroku vs Deno Deploy
- Heroku vs Hetzner Cloud
- Heroku vs Linode
- Heroku vs Packer
- Heroku vs Pulumi
- Heroku vs Render
- Heroku vs Upstash
- Heroku vs Vagrant
- Heroku vs Akamai
- Heroku vs Alibaba Cloud
- Heroku vs Chef
- Heroku vs Contabo
- Vultr vs Grafana Cloud
- Vultr vs Neon
- Vultr vs DigitalOcean
- Vultr vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vultr vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Vultr vs Deno Deploy
- Vultr vs Hetzner Cloud
- Vultr vs Linode
- Vultr vs Packer
- Vultr vs Pulumi
- Vultr vs Render
- Vultr vs Upstash
- Vultr vs Vagrant
- Vultr vs Akamai
- Vultr vs Alibaba Cloud
- Vultr vs Chef
- Vultr vs Contabo


