AI · head to head
Galileo vs n8n

Galileo
AI
Evaluation and observability platform for GenAI applications and agents
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Galileo the free plan is limited to 5,000 traces per month, which is quickly outgrown by production workloads.; n8n starter tier limited to 1 project and 5 concurrent executions
- They diverge on capability: Galileo covers Pre-built evaluations, n8n covers Workflow automation.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Galileo and n8n actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Galileo
- Pre-built evaluations
- Ground truth capture
- Luna models
- Agent behavior analysis
- Production guardrails
- Flexible deployment
Only in n8n
- Workflow automation
- Visual editor
- Conditional execution
- Looping
- Error handling
- Scheduling
- Webhooks
- REST API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Galileo
- Evaluating RAG and agent applications before production releasenot n8n
- Monitoring live GenAI applications for failures and driftnot n8n
- Applying real-time guardrails without custom integration worknot n8n
- Reducing evaluation costs using distilled Luna judge modelsnot n8n
n8n
- Building AI agents and workflow automation for technical teamsnot Galileo
- Visual workflow design with capability to write custom JavaScript or Python codenot Galileo
- Enterprise deployments with self-hosted or cloud optionsnot Galileo
- Integrating 500+ pre-built applications with custom API connectionsnot Galileo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Galileo
- The free plan is limited to 5,000 traces per month, which is quickly outgrown by production workloads.
- Real-time guardrails and unlimited trace capacity are reserved for the custom-priced Enterprise tier.
- Pro plan pricing scales with trace volume, so costs can grow unpredictably as usage increases.
- On-premises deployment requires an Enterprise contract rather than being available self-serve.
n8n
- Starter tier limited to 1 project and 5 concurrent executions
- Starter and Pro tiers restricted to Cloud hosting only, not self-hosted
- Business tier requires 6 months minimum commitment at €667/month
- SSO/SAML/LDAP authentication requires Business or Enterprise tier
- Dedicated support with SLA available only on Enterprise plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Galileo
Free- FreeFree
- 5,000 traces/month
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited custom evaluations
- Pro$100/month
- 50,000 traces/month
- Standard role-based access control
- Advanced analytics and insights
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Unlimited trace capacity
- Custom rate limits
- Hosted, VPC, or on-prem deployment
n8n
Free- CommunityFree
- Free self-hosted version on GitHub
- Open source
- Starter$20/month
- 2,500 workflow executions
- 5 concurrent executions
- 2,300 AI credits/month
- Pro$50/month
- 10,000 workflow executions
- 20 concurrent executions
- 13,700 AI credits/month
- Business$667/month
- 40,000 workflow executions
- Self-hosted option
- 6 shared projects
Which should you pick?
Choose Galileo if
- You need pre-built evaluations.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want ground truth capture.
Choose n8n if
- You need workflow automation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want visual editor.
Questions people ask
- Is Galileo or n8n better?
- Neither clearly leads. Galileo starts at Free and n8n at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Galileo or n8n?
- Galileo starts at Free and n8n at Free.
- Does Galileo or n8n run on more platforms?
- Galileo runs on web, api. n8n runs on Web, Docker, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Galileo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Galileo best used for?
- Galileo is most often used for evaluating rag and agent applications before production release, monitoring live genai applications for failures and drift, applying real-time guardrails without custom integration work, reducing evaluation costs using distilled luna judge models. Of those, evaluating rag and agent applications before production release and monitoring live genai applications for failures and drift are not what n8n is typically brought in for.
- What can Galileo do that n8n cannot?
- Galileo covers Pre-built evaluations, Ground truth capture, Luna models, Agent behavior analysis. n8n covers Workflow automation, Visual editor, Conditional execution, Looping.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Galileo: What does Galileo cost?
Galileo offers a free plan, a Pro plan at $100/month billed yearly (with a 33% annual discount), and a custom-priced Enterprise plan for unlimited trace capacity.
Sourcen8n: Is there a free version of n8n?
Yes, n8n Community Edition is free and open-source, available for self-hosting on GitHub with unlimited users and workflows.
SourceGalileo: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
The Free plan includes 5,000 traces per month with unlimited users and unlimited custom evaluations, aimed at developers and small teams experimenting with GenAI.
Sourcen8n: What is the difference between n8n plans?
Plans differ by monthly workflow executions (2,500 for Starter, 10,000 for Pro, 40,000 for Business), concurrent execution limits, AI credits, and shared project counts.
SourceGalileo: How is usage metered?
Galileo's pricing scales based on the number of traces processed each month, with Free capped at 5,000, Pro at 50,000, and Enterprise offering unlimited trace capacity.
Sourcen8n: Does n8n offer annual billing discounts?
Yes, n8n offers 17% off when billing annually instead of monthly, and provides a Startup Plan at 50% off Business pricing for companies under 20 employees.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Galileo vs Pika
- Galileo vs Anthropic API
- Galileo vs D-ID
- Galileo vs Fathom
- Galileo vs Together AI
- Galileo vs Stable Diffusion
- Galileo vs Arize AI
- Galileo vs ChatGPT
- Galileo vs Perplexity
- Galileo vs AutoGen
- Galileo vs Black Forest Labs
- Galileo vs Cartesia
- Galileo vs Deepgram
- Galileo vs Helicone
- Galileo vs Ideogram
- Galileo vs Jasper
- Galileo vs LangGraph
- Galileo vs Lindy
- Galileo vs Zapier
- Galileo vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Galileo vs MuleSoft
- Galileo vs Parabola
- Galileo vs Airbyte
- Galileo vs Dagster
- Galileo vs Prefect
- Galileo vs Automation Anywhere
- Galileo vs Blue Prism
- Galileo vs CrewAI
- Galileo vs Fivetran
- Galileo vs Mage AI
- Galileo vs Temporal
- Galileo vs UiPath
- Galileo vs Workato
- Galileo vs Jitterbit
- Galileo vs mParticle
- Galileo vs Paragon
- n8n vs Pika
- n8n vs Anthropic API
- n8n vs D-ID
- n8n vs Fathom
- n8n vs Together AI
- n8n vs Stable Diffusion
- n8n vs Arize AI
- n8n vs ChatGPT
- n8n vs Perplexity
- n8n vs AutoGen
- n8n vs Black Forest Labs
- n8n vs Cartesia
- n8n vs Deepgram
- n8n vs Helicone
- n8n vs Ideogram
- n8n vs Jasper
- n8n vs LangGraph
- n8n vs Lindy
- n8n vs Zapier
- n8n vs Microsoft Power Automate
- n8n vs MuleSoft
- n8n vs Parabola
- n8n vs Airbyte
- n8n vs Dagster
- n8n vs Prefect
- n8n vs Automation Anywhere
- n8n vs Blue Prism
- n8n vs CrewAI
- n8n vs Fivetran
- n8n vs Mage AI
- n8n vs Temporal
- n8n vs UiPath
- n8n vs Workato
- n8n vs Jitterbit
- n8n vs mParticle
- n8n vs Paragon

