Healthcare · head to head
Fullscript vs Visage Imaging

Fullscript
Healthcare
Supplement dispensing for practitioners, free to use because it earns on the products
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Visage Imaging
Healthcare
Server-side streaming PACS built for radiologists reading very large studies over thin connections
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Fullscript has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fullscript the practitioner sets their own margin on products they clinically recommend, which is a conflict of interest that some professional bodies and patients view badly, and the platform makes the arrangement easy rather than making it visible.; Visage Imaging pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- They diverge on capability: Fullscript covers Protocol dispensing, Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fullscript and Visage Imaging actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fullscript | Visage Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fullscript
- Protocol dispensing
- Profit dispensary
- Auto refill
- Lab ordering
- Patient app
- EHR integration
- Enterprise catalogue control
Only in Visage Imaging
- Server-side rendering
- One Viewer
- Native multi-dimensional tools
- Digital breast tomosynthesis reading
- Open archive
- Cloud PACS operations
- AI accelerator
- On the fly patient jacket
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fullscript
- A functional medicine practice that wants to stop holding supplement stock, cash and expiry risk in the clinicnot Visage Imaging
- A dietitian or naturopath adding a dispensary revenue stream without buying inventory upfrontnot Visage Imaging
- A clinic that needs patients to actually keep taking a protocol, where auto refills and dose reminders address the adherence problem directlynot Visage Imaging
- A multi site integrative health group that wants a single approved catalogue rather than each clinician choosing their own brandsnot Visage Imaging
Visage Imaging
- An academic health system whose radiologists read from home and cannot tolerate a thousand slice CT taking minutes to opennot Fullscript
- A breast imaging service moving to tomosynthesis where study sizes have made the existing PACS unusable at volumenot Fullscript
- A teleradiology group covering many client sites that needs one viewer rather than a client-specific workstation per contractnot Fullscript
- A health system mid migration that needs priors from three legacy archives assembled into one patient jacket before the data move finishesnot Fullscript
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fullscript
- The practitioner sets their own margin on products they clinically recommend, which is a conflict of interest that some professional bodies and patients view badly, and the platform makes the arrangement easy rather than making it visible.
- The account is free but the practice does not control pricing, catalogue, shipping cost or the patient discount, so the entire economics of the dispensary can be changed by the vendor without the practice having any lever.
- Converting to a profit account requires personal identity verification, tax details and a bank account, and makes dispensary earnings the practitioner personal taxable income to report, which is administrative work no one warns about at signup.
- Product availability and shipping are geographically limited, so practices outside the supported countries cannot use it at all and cross border patients will find items unavailable at checkout.
- Patient refill schedules, plan history and a slice of practice revenue accumulate inside a platform the practice cannot export in a form another dispensary would accept, so switching later means asking every patient to re-enrol somewhere else.
Visage Imaging
- Pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- Module breadth outside radiology is narrower than at Sectra or the large modality vendors, so a group planning to digitise pathology on the same platform will not find it here.
- Server-side rendering shifts the cost to central infrastructure, so the saving on radiologist workstations is partly offset by what you spend on servers or cloud compute.
- Pro Medicus concentrates on very large contracts, and smaller imaging groups report long sales cycles and little appetite from the vendor for deals below a certain volume.
- Diagnostic AI is third party, surfaced through the accelerator framework rather than developed in house, so algorithm licensing, validation and monitoring remain the buyer problem.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fullscript
Free- PractitionerFree
- Full catalogue and dispensing at no account fee
- Lab ordering and results
- Standard EHR integrations
- PatientFree
- No account fee
- Mobile app with dose reminders
- Auto refills, cancellable at any time
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Quoted for health systems and multi site groups
- Centrally managed catalogue with quality standards
- API level EHR integration
Visage Imaging
On request- Visage 7 enterprise contract$undefined/year
- Transaction pricing per exam with a minimum annual volume commitment
- Seven to ten year terms typical for health system contracts
- Contract totals for major deals are disclosed by Pro Medicus to the ASX
Which should you pick?
Choose Fullscript if
- You need protocol dispensing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want profit dispensary.
Choose Visage Imaging if
- You need server-side rendering.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- You also want one viewer.
Questions people ask
- Is Fullscript or Visage Imaging better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fullscript starts at Free and Visage Imaging at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fullscript or Visage Imaging?
- Fullscript has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Fullscript and On request for Visage Imaging.
- Does Fullscript or Visage Imaging run on more platforms?
- Fullscript runs on Web, iOS, Android. Visage Imaging runs on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- Can I use Fullscript for free?
- Yes. Fullscript has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Visage Imaging starts at On request.
- What is Fullscript best used for?
- Fullscript is most often used for a functional medicine practice that wants to stop holding supplement stock, cash and expiry risk in the clinic, a dietitian or naturopath adding a dispensary revenue stream without buying inventory upfront, a clinic that needs patients to actually keep taking a protocol, where auto refills and dose reminders address the adherence problem directly, a multi site integrative health group that wants a single approved catalogue rather than each clinician choosing their own brands. Of those, a functional medicine practice that wants to stop holding supplement stock, cash and expiry risk in the clinic and a dietitian or naturopath adding a dispensary revenue stream without buying inventory upfront are not what Visage Imaging is typically brought in for.
- What can Fullscript do that Visage Imaging cannot?
- Fullscript covers Protocol dispensing, Profit dispensary, Auto refill, Lab ordering. Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering, One Viewer, Native multi-dimensional tools, Digital breast tomosynthesis reading.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fullscript: Is Fullscript really free for practitioners?
Yes, the account has no fee. Fullscript earns on the supplements sold through it, and a practitioner on a profit account also earns a margin on those sales.
Visage Imaging: Who owns Visage Imaging?
Pro Medicus Limited, listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. That listing means major contract values and terms are publicly announced.
Fullscript: How do practitioners make money on it?
By converting to a profit dispensary and setting a margin. That requires tax information and a bank account, and the earnings are taxable income.
Visage Imaging: How is Visage priced?
Per exam, against a minimum annual volume, on multi-year terms. Because Pro Medicus discloses large contract totals and durations to the market, buyers can estimate a per exam rate before entering negotiation.
Fullscript: What do patients pay?
No account fee, and a ten per cent discount on orders if the practitioner runs a no profit dispensary rather than taking a margin.
Visage Imaging: Is Visage 7 FDA cleared for diagnostic interpretation?
Yes, Visage 7 holds 510(k) clearance for diagnostic viewing including mammography and tomosynthesis on validated displays. Confirm the exact cleared modality list for your intended use.
Fullscript: Is there an enterprise option?
Yes, quoted for health systems, adding central catalogue control, API EHR integration and cross site reporting.
Visage Imaging: Does it work as a full cloud PACS?
Yes, Visage 7 runs complete PACS operations in the cloud rather than cloud viewing over an on-premise archive.
Related pages
More on Visage Imaging
Other head to heads
- Fullscript vs Epic MyChart
- Fullscript vs Healthgrades
- Fullscript vs Techcyte
- Fullscript vs Jane App
- Fullscript vs Ambra Health
- Fullscript vs Lunit
- Fullscript vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Fullscript vs Doctor on Demand
- Fullscript vs DHIS2
- Fullscript vs OpenClinica
- Fullscript vs Paige
- Fullscript vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Fullscript vs Tebra
- Fullscript vs TheraNest
- Fullscript vs Updox
- Fullscript vs UpToDate
- Fullscript vs Woebot Health
- Fullscript vs Zanda Health
- Fullscript vs Sectra
- Fullscript vs Rad AI
- Fullscript vs Epic Systems
- Fullscript vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Fullscript vs Gleamer
- Fullscript vs Annalise.ai
- Fullscript vs OpenMRS
- Fullscript vs Signant Health
- Fullscript vs Aidoc
- Fullscript vs Clue
- Fullscript vs Allscripts
- Fullscript vs Dentrix
- Fullscript vs Flo
- Visage Imaging vs Epic MyChart
- Visage Imaging vs Healthgrades
- Visage Imaging vs Techcyte
- Visage Imaging vs Jane App
- Visage Imaging vs Ambra Health
- Visage Imaging vs Lunit
- Visage Imaging vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Visage Imaging vs Doctor on Demand
- Visage Imaging vs DHIS2
- Visage Imaging vs OpenClinica
- Visage Imaging vs Paige
- Visage Imaging vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Visage Imaging vs Tebra
- Visage Imaging vs TheraNest
- Visage Imaging vs Updox
- Visage Imaging vs UpToDate
- Visage Imaging vs Woebot Health
- Visage Imaging vs Zanda Health
- Visage Imaging vs Sectra
- Visage Imaging vs Rad AI
- Visage Imaging vs Epic Systems
- Visage Imaging vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Visage Imaging vs Gleamer
- Visage Imaging vs Annalise.ai
- Visage Imaging vs OpenMRS
- Visage Imaging vs Signant Health
- Visage Imaging vs Aidoc
- Visage Imaging vs Clue
- Visage Imaging vs Allscripts
- Visage Imaging vs Dentrix
- Visage Imaging vs Flo
