Manufacturing · head to head
Fulcrum vs LabVIEW

Fulcrum
Manufacturing
Field operations management for installing, inspecting and maintaining physical work
- From
- $39/month
- Rated
- -

LabVIEW
Manufacturing
Graphical dataflow programming for automated test, measurement and instrument control
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fulcrum monthly pricing only available for first 12 months; after that, annual commitment required; LabVIEW nI is now part of Emerson, completing in 2023, so LabVIEW sits inside an industrial automation conglomerate rather than being the flagship of a dedicated test company; roadmap priorities and support pricing follow the parent, not the user base.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fulcrum and LabVIEW actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fulcrum
Nothing recorded that LabVIEW does not also cover.
Only in LabVIEW
- Graphical dataflow programming
- Front panels
- Instrument driver library
- Hardware integration
- Real-time and FPGA targets
- Analysis and signal processing
- Application builder
- Nigel AI assistant
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fulcrum
- Capturing inspection photos and data completely offlinenot LabVIEW
- Collecting field data in areas without cell coveragenot LabVIEW
- Tagging asset locations with geospatial coordinatesnot LabVIEW
- Automating asset maintenance work order workflowsnot LabVIEW
LabVIEW
- An automotive supplier building an end-of-line test rig that must drive a power supply, read a scope and log pass/fail against a serial numbernot Fulcrum
- A semiconductor lab characterising devices across a PXI chassis where deterministic timing between instruments mattersnot Fulcrum
- A medical device manufacturer needing a validated, documented test system with an operator front panel a technician can run unsupervisednot Fulcrum
- A research group prototyping a control loop on CompactRIO where part of the logic must compile down to an FPGAnot Fulcrum
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fulcrum
- Monthly pricing only available for first 12 months; after that, annual commitment required
- Additional storage costs $2.20 USD per month per 20 GB block
- Enterprise plan requires minimum of 5 users
LabVIEW
- NI is now part of Emerson, completing in 2023, so LabVIEW sits inside an industrial automation conglomerate rather than being the flagship of a dedicated test company; roadmap priorities and support pricing follow the parent, not the user base.
- No prices appear anywhere on the NI site for commercial editions; Base, Full, Professional and the LabVIEW+ suite are all quoted through NI or a reseller, so a buyer cannot compare cost against a Python-plus-PyVISA alternative without opening a sales conversation.
- Graphical source code diffs badly. Merging two engineers’ changes to the same virtual instrument in git is impractical without NI’s own comparison tools, so team development on LabVIEW is slower and more serialised than on text-based languages.
- The pool of engineers who write LabVIEW is small and ageing relative to the pool who write Python, so hiring a replacement for the person who built your test rig is materially harder and more expensive than replacing a general software engineer.
- The environment pulls you toward NI hardware and NI add-on toolkits, and licences for real-time, FPGA and vision modules are sold separately on top of the base edition, so the quoted LabVIEW price is rarely the delivered cost of a working test system.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fulcrum
$39/month- Professional$43/month
- 100 GB storage
- 10 data shares
- Standard email and in-app support
- Elite$39/month
- 500 GB storage
- 50 data shares
- Priority email, in-app, and phone support
- Enterprise$null/mo
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users minimum 5
- Unlimited storage
LabVIEW
On request- LabVIEW Community EditionFree
- Free for personal, non-commercial use only
- Full LabVIEW feature set for hobbyists
- No commercial deployment rights
- LabVIEW Base$undefined/year
- Core acquisition, control and user interface capability
- Suited to simple test and measurement applications
- Available as subscription or perpetual licence
- LabVIEW Full$undefined/year
- Adds advanced analysis and signal processing
- Recommended where mathematics and filtering are required
- Available as subscription or perpetual licence
- LabVIEW Professional$undefined/year
- Adds application builder, source control and deployment tooling
- Includes the Nigel AI assistant
- Available as subscription or perpetual licence
Which should you pick?
Choose Fulcrum if
Nothing in the data separates Fulcrum from LabVIEW on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose LabVIEW if
- You need graphical dataflow programming.
- You work on Windows, Linux, macOS.
- You also want front panels.
Questions people ask
- Is Fulcrum or LabVIEW better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fulcrum starts at $39/month and LabVIEW at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fulcrum or LabVIEW?
- Fulcrum starts at $39/month and LabVIEW at On request.
- Does Fulcrum or LabVIEW run on more platforms?
- Fulcrum runs on Web. LabVIEW runs on Windows, Linux, macOS.
- What is Fulcrum best used for?
- Fulcrum is most often used for capturing inspection photos and data completely offline, collecting field data in areas without cell coverage, tagging asset locations with geospatial coordinates, automating asset maintenance work order workflows. Of those, capturing inspection photos and data completely offline and collecting field data in areas without cell coverage are not what LabVIEW is typically brought in for.
- What can Fulcrum do that LabVIEW cannot?
- LabVIEW covers Graphical dataflow programming, Front panels, Instrument driver library, Hardware integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fulcrum: How much does Fulcrum cost per user?
Professional and Elite plans cost $43 per month for monthly billing or $55 per user per month when billed annually. Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Fulcrum.
SourceLabVIEW: Who owns LabVIEW now?
NI, formerly National Instruments, was acquired by Emerson in an acquisition that completed in 2023. LabVIEW is now an Emerson product.
Fulcrum: What is Fulcrum's storage limit?
Professional includes 100 GB storage, Elite includes 500 GB storage, and Enterprise includes unlimited storage. Additional storage blocks of 20 GB cost $2.20 USD per month.
SourceLabVIEW: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
Yes. NI offers both subscription and perpetual licences and states there are no functional or feature-level differences between them.
Fulcrum: Are there restrictions on monthly billing for Fulcrum?
Monthly pricing is only available during the first 12 months as a Fulcrum customer. After 12 months, the company learns your usage pattern and offers pricing with an annual commitment required.
SourceLabVIEW: Is there a free version?
LabVIEW Community Edition is free for personal, non-commercial use. It carries no commercial deployment rights.
LabVIEW: How much does it cost?
NI does not publish commercial edition prices. Base, Full, Professional and LabVIEW+ are all quoted through NI or a reseller.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Fulcrum vs Tulip
- Fulcrum vs Authentise
- Fulcrum vs Fusion 360
- Fulcrum vs SolidWorks
- Fulcrum vs MachineMetrics
- Fulcrum vs Oqton
- Fulcrum vs Paperless Parts
- Fulcrum vs eMaint
- Fulcrum vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Fulcrum vs 3YOURMIND
- Fulcrum vs Markforged Eiger
- Fulcrum vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Fulcrum vs Duro PLM
- Fulcrum vs Dyndrite
- Fulcrum vs Erbessd Instruments
- Fulcrum vs Fictiv
- Fulcrum vs Prodsmart
- Fulcrum vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Fulcrum vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Fulcrum vs AMFG
- Fulcrum vs Arena PLM
- Fulcrum vs JobBOSS²
- Fulcrum vs Litmus Edge
- Fulcrum vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Fulcrum vs Petasense
- Fulcrum vs Poseidon Systems
- Fulcrum vs PROGNOST Systems
- Fulcrum vs Propel
- Fulcrum vs PTC Windchill
- LabVIEW vs Tulip
- LabVIEW vs Authentise
- LabVIEW vs Fusion 360
- LabVIEW vs SolidWorks
- LabVIEW vs MachineMetrics
- LabVIEW vs Oqton
- LabVIEW vs Paperless Parts
- LabVIEW vs eMaint
- LabVIEW vs SKF Enlight Centre
- LabVIEW vs 3YOURMIND
- LabVIEW vs Markforged Eiger
- LabVIEW vs COPA-DATA zenon
- LabVIEW vs Duro PLM
- LabVIEW vs Dyndrite
- LabVIEW vs Erbessd Instruments
- LabVIEW vs Fictiv
- LabVIEW vs Prodsmart
- LabVIEW vs Autodesk Netfabb
- LabVIEW vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- LabVIEW vs AMFG
- LabVIEW vs Arena PLM
- LabVIEW vs JobBOSS²
- LabVIEW vs Litmus Edge
- LabVIEW vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- LabVIEW vs Petasense
- LabVIEW vs Poseidon Systems
- LabVIEW vs PROGNOST Systems
- LabVIEW vs Propel
- LabVIEW vs PTC Windchill
