Cybersecurity · head to head
Frontegg vs Periscope Holdings

Frontegg
Cybersecurity
Customer identity and access management platform for SaaS applications
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Periscope Holdings
Government
Statewide e-procurement systems and supplier networks for large public agencies
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Frontegg has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Frontegg detailed per-unit pricing beyond the free tier is not published, requiring use of an online calculator or sales contact to estimate costs.; Periscope Holdings it is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- They diverge on capability: Frontegg covers Hosted login, Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Frontegg and Periscope Holdings actually diverge.
| Attribute | Frontegg | Periscope Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | usage-based | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | web, api | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Frontegg
- Hosted login
- Enterprise SSO/SCIM
- Multi-tenant organizations
- Custom domains
- M2M tokens
- Fraud protection
Only in Periscope Holdings
- Sealed bid solicitation
- Supplier registration network
- Contract catalogues
- Cooperative purchasing
- Spend and compliance reporting
- Supplier diversity tracking
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Frontegg
- Adding enterprise SSO/SCIM to a B2B SaaS productnot Periscope Holdings
- Multi-tenant customer identity managementnot Periscope Holdings
- White-labeled, custom-domain login experiencesnot Periscope Holdings
- Securing AI agent access to a SaaS product via Agen.conot Periscope Holdings
Periscope Holdings
- A state building a central procurement portal serving many agencies and local entitiesnot Frontegg
- A large agency needing statutory sealed bidding with a public opening recordnot Frontegg
- A purchasing programme that must report spend and supplier diversity across entitiesnot Frontegg
- A state wanting local governments to buy from its awarded cooperative contractsnot Frontegg
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Frontegg
- Detailed per-unit pricing beyond the free tier is not published, requiring use of an online calculator or sales contact to estimate costs.
- Advanced fraud protection and multiple environments are Enterprise-only, unavailable on the Pay As You Go plan.
- The 7,500 free monthly active users is comparatively modest next to some competitors' free tiers.
- As a broader CIAM platform, it can be more complex to integrate than lighter-weight developer-first auth tools for smaller apps.
Periscope Holdings
- It is scaled and priced for statewide programmes, so a single city or county typically finds both the implementation effort and the cost out of proportion to its needs.
- The interface reflects the age and regulatory weight of the platform, and suppliers routinely describe registration and bidding as harder than on newer portals, which can suppress bid response.
- Ownership has changed twice since 2021, from independent to mdf commerce to KKR, so roadmap and support continuity should be written into the contract rather than assumed.
- Sibling products inside mdf commerce cover adjacent procurement ground, which means an apparently competitive shortlist may contain two products with the same owner.
- Statewide implementations are multi year projects with heavy configuration and change management, and the professional services cost commonly exceeds the software over the contract term.
Pricing, plan by plan
Frontegg
Free- Pay As You GoFree
- 7,500 monthly active users included
- 5 enterprise connections (SSO/SCIM)
- Unlimited organizations
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom pricing
- Multiple environments
- Advanced fraud protection
Periscope Holdings
On request- BuySpeed$undefined/year
- Quoted per programme, scaled to entities served and transaction volume
- Multi year statewide contracts with implementation priced separately
- Supplier side registration fees form part of the commercial model on some programmes
Which should you pick?
Choose Frontegg if
- You need hosted login.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want enterprise sso/scim.
Choose Periscope Holdings if
- You need sealed bid solicitation.
- You also want supplier registration network.
Questions people ask
- Is Frontegg or Periscope Holdings better?
- Neither clearly leads. Frontegg starts at Free and Periscope Holdings at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Frontegg or Periscope Holdings?
- Frontegg has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Frontegg and On request for Periscope Holdings.
- Does Frontegg or Periscope Holdings run on more platforms?
- Frontegg runs on web, api. Periscope Holdings runs on Web.
- Can I use Frontegg for free?
- Yes. Frontegg has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Periscope Holdings starts at On request.
- What is Frontegg best used for?
- Frontegg is most often used for adding enterprise sso/scim to a b2b saas product, multi-tenant customer identity management, white-labeled, custom-domain login experiences, securing ai agent access to a saas product via agen.co. Of those, adding enterprise sso/scim to a b2b saas product and multi-tenant customer identity management are not what Periscope Holdings is typically brought in for.
- What can Frontegg do that Periscope Holdings cannot?
- Frontegg covers Hosted login, Enterprise SSO/SCIM, Multi-tenant organizations, Custom domains. Periscope Holdings covers Sealed bid solicitation, Supplier registration network, Contract catalogues, Cooperative purchasing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Frontegg: What does Frontegg cost?
Frontegg's Pay As You Go plan is free up to 7,500 monthly active users, after which pricing scales with users, enterprise connections and M2M tokens via an online calculator; Enterprise pricing is custom.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: Who owns Periscope Holdings?
mdf commerce acquired it in 2021, and mdf commerce was itself acquired by KKR in 2024.
Frontegg: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
Yes, the free Pay As You Go plan includes 7,500 monthly active users, 5 enterprise SSO/SCIM connections, unlimited organizations, and a custom domain.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: Is it suitable for a single city?
Usually not. It is built and priced for statewide or very large agency programmes.
Frontegg: How is usage metered?
Pricing is consumption-based, driven by monthly active users, monthly enterprise connections (SSO/SCIM), and monthly M2M tokens, with customers paying only for usage beyond the free 7,500-user threshold.
SourcePeriscope Holdings: What is BuySpeed?
The e-procurement platform behind its statewide deployments, covering solicitation through catalogue ordering and reporting.
Periscope Holdings: Can we see what a state paid?
Yes. State procurement awards are public records and typically disclose the full multi year contract value.
Related pages
More on Periscope Holdings
Other head to heads
- Frontegg vs Clerk
- Frontegg vs Authelia
- Frontegg vs Akeyless
- Frontegg vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Frontegg vs 1Password
- Frontegg vs authentik
- Frontegg vs Logto
- Frontegg vs Ory Kratos
- Frontegg vs Ping Identity
- Frontegg vs Speakeasy
- Frontegg vs Doppler
- Frontegg vs Infisical
- Frontegg vs Diligent
- Frontegg vs Endor Labs
- Frontegg vs Enpass
- Frontegg vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Frontegg vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Frontegg vs Euna Solutions
- Frontegg vs Bidnet Direct
- Frontegg vs OpenGov
- Frontegg vs Bonfire
- Frontegg vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Frontegg vs NEOGOV
- Frontegg vs ArchiveSocial
- Frontegg vs Clariti
- Frontegg vs GovPilot
- Frontegg vs mySidewalk
- Frontegg vs SAP for Government
- Frontegg vs Axon Records
- Frontegg vs CitizenLab
- Frontegg vs ClearGov
- Frontegg vs eCode360
- Frontegg vs MyRec.com
- Frontegg vs DemandStar
- Periscope Holdings vs Clerk
- Periscope Holdings vs Authelia
- Periscope Holdings vs Akeyless
- Periscope Holdings vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Periscope Holdings vs 1Password
- Periscope Holdings vs authentik
- Periscope Holdings vs Logto
- Periscope Holdings vs Ory Kratos
- Periscope Holdings vs Ping Identity
- Periscope Holdings vs Speakeasy
- Periscope Holdings vs Doppler
- Periscope Holdings vs Infisical
- Periscope Holdings vs Diligent
- Periscope Holdings vs Endor Labs
- Periscope Holdings vs Enpass
- Periscope Holdings vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Periscope Holdings vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Periscope Holdings vs Euna Solutions
- Periscope Holdings vs Bidnet Direct
- Periscope Holdings vs OpenGov
- Periscope Holdings vs Bonfire
- Periscope Holdings vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Periscope Holdings vs NEOGOV
- Periscope Holdings vs ArchiveSocial
- Periscope Holdings vs Clariti
- Periscope Holdings vs GovPilot
- Periscope Holdings vs mySidewalk
- Periscope Holdings vs SAP for Government
- Periscope Holdings vs Axon Records
- Periscope Holdings vs CitizenLab
- Periscope Holdings vs ClearGov
- Periscope Holdings vs eCode360
- Periscope Holdings vs MyRec.com
- Periscope Holdings vs DemandStar
