Softwr

Software · head to head

FRISS vs SailPoint

FRISS logo

FRISS

Software

Trust automation for insurance

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
SailPoint logo

SailPoint

Software

Identity governance for insurance operations

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: FRISS fRISS's homepage confirms the insurance fraud-detection product but every pricing action is a 'contact sales' prompt, with no edition names or figures published anywhere on the site; SailPoint the Internet Archive's capture of SailPoint's homepage on 30 December 2019 named specific integrations (AWS, Cerner, Epic, Office 365, Salesforce, SAP, ServiceNow, Workday) and compliance frameworks covered (CCPA, FISMA, GDPR, HIPAA, SOX), but no price figure was published on the page.
  • They diverge on capability: FRISS covers Underwriting risk scoring, SailPoint covers Identity governance.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which FRISS and SailPoint actually diverge.

Attributes where FRISS and SailPoint differ
AttributeFRISSSailPoint
PlatformsWeb, ApiWeb, On-premise
Founded20062005

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in FRISS

  • Underwriting risk scoring
  • Claims fraud detection
  • Network analysis
  • Real-time decisioning
  • Third-party data enrichment
  • Case management
  • Predictive analytics
  • Compliance monitoring

Only in SailPoint

  • Identity governance
  • Access management
  • Compliance automation
  • Risk analytics
  • Reporting
  • Audit trails
  • API access
  • Integration support

Both cover

  • SOC2
  • ISO27001
  • Cloud deployment
  • On-premise deployment
  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

FRISS

  • Fraud detectionnot SailPoint
  • Risk assessmentnot SailPoint
  • Underwriting automationnot SailPoint
  • Claims investigationnot SailPoint
  • Compliancenot SailPoint

SailPoint

  • Access controlnot FRISS
  • Compliance managementnot FRISS

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

FRISS

  • FRISS's homepage confirms the insurance fraud-detection product but every pricing action is a 'contact sales' prompt, with no edition names or figures published anywhere on the site

SailPoint

  • The Internet Archive's capture of SailPoint's homepage on 30 December 2019 named specific integrations (AWS, Cerner, Epic, Office 365, Salesforce, SAP, ServiceNow, Workday) and compliance frameworks covered (CCPA, FISMA, GDPR, HIPAA, SOX), but no price figure was published on the page.

Pricing, plan by plan

FRISS

On request
  • Underwriting$undefined/year
    • Risk scoring
    • Application fraud detection
    • Real-time assessment
  • Claims$undefined/year
    • Claims fraud detection
    • Network analysis
    • Investigation prioritization
  • Enterprise Platform$undefined/year
    • All modules
    • Custom models
    • Advanced analytics

SailPoint

On request
  • Enterprise$undefined/month
    • Identity governance
    • Access management
    • Compliance monitoring

Which should you pick?

Choose FRISS if

  • You need underwriting risk scoring.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want claims fraud detection.
FRISS review

Choose SailPoint if

  • You need identity governance.
  • You work on Web, On-premise.
  • You also want access management.
SailPoint review

Questions people ask

Is FRISS or SailPoint better?
Neither clearly leads. FRISS starts at On request and SailPoint at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, FRISS or SailPoint?
FRISS starts at On request and SailPoint at On request.
Does FRISS or SailPoint run on more platforms?
FRISS runs on Web, Api. SailPoint runs on Web, On-premise.
What is FRISS best used for?
FRISS is most often used for fraud detection, risk assessment, underwriting automation, claims investigation. Of those, fraud detection and risk assessment are not what SailPoint is typically brought in for.
What can FRISS do that SailPoint cannot?
FRISS covers Underwriting risk scoring, Claims fraud detection, Network analysis, Real-time decisioning. SailPoint covers Identity governance, Access management, Compliance automation, Risk analytics. Both handle SOC2, ISO27001, Cloud deployment, On-premise deployment.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on FRISS

More on SailPoint

Keep looking

Other head to heads