Softwr

Software · head to head

Fluence Energy Management vs Aurora Solar

Fluence Energy Management logo

Fluence Energy Management

Software

Battery energy storage system software and services

From
On request
Rated
-
Aurora Solar logo

Aurora Solar

Software

The leading solar design and sales platform

From
$250/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Fluence Energy Management no price, licensing model, subscription term or contract detail is published anywhere on the site; the only route is a contact page; Aurora Solar both published plans are single user, so a second designer means a second licence
  • They diverge on capability: Fluence Energy Management covers Battery management, Aurora Solar covers 3D solar design.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Fluence Energy Management and Aurora Solar actually diverge.

Attributes where Fluence Energy Management and Aurora Solar differ
AttributeFluence Energy ManagementAurora Solar
Starting priceOn request$250/month
Pricing modelquotesubscription
PlatformsWeb, MobileWeb, Api
Founded20162013

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Fluence Energy Management

  • Battery management
  • Grid services optimization
  • Performance analytics
  • Remote monitoring
  • Integration management
  • Cloud deployment
  • Web support
  • Mobile support

Only in Aurora Solar

  • 3D solar design
  • Shade analysis
  • LIDAR integration
  • Performance simulation
  • Sales proposals
  • Financing options
  • Permit packages
  • NEC code compliance

Both cover

  • SSL encryption

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Fluence Energy Management

  • Automated market bidding for battery energy storage with Mosaicnot Aurora Solar
  • Asset performance management for renewable generation fleets with Nisperanot Aurora Solar
  • Operating grid scale energy storage systemsnot Aurora Solar

Aurora Solar

  • Designing and simulating residential and commercial solar installationsnot Fluence Energy Management
  • Producing shade analysis and sales proposals for solar projectsnot Fluence Energy Management

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Fluence Energy Management

  • No price, licensing model, subscription term or contract detail is published anywhere on the site; the only route is a contact page
  • Bidding and asset performance management are separate products, Mosaic and Nispera, rather than one platform licence

Aurora Solar

  • Both published plans are single user, so a second designer means a second licence
  • Projects are capped at 50 a month on both Basic and Premium, so the tiers differ on features rather than volume
  • LIDAR assisted modelling, shade reports and battery storage modelling all require Premium at $259 a month
  • API access and integrations are Enterprise only, which is priced per project rather than per month
  • Paying monthly rather than annually costs $288 more a year on Basic and $468 on Premium

Pricing, plan by plan

Fluence Energy Management

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Fluence Energy Management review.

Aurora Solar

$250/month
  • Starter$250/month
    • Basic design tools
    • Sales mode
    • Shade analysis
  • Pro$500/month
    • Advanced LIDAR integration
    • Performance simulation
    • Custom branding
  • Enterprise$undefined/month
    • Unlimited users
    • Advanced analytics
    • Custom integrations

Which should you pick?

Choose Fluence Energy Management if

  • You need battery management.
  • You work on Web, Mobile.
  • You also want grid services optimization.

Choose Aurora Solar if

  • You need 3d solar design.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want shade analysis.

Questions people ask

Is Fluence Energy Management or Aurora Solar better?
Neither clearly leads. Fluence Energy Management starts at On request and Aurora Solar at $250/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Fluence Energy Management or Aurora Solar?
Fluence Energy Management starts at On request and Aurora Solar at $250/month.
Does Fluence Energy Management or Aurora Solar run on more platforms?
Fluence Energy Management runs on Web, Mobile. Aurora Solar runs on Web, Api.
What is Fluence Energy Management best used for?
Fluence Energy Management is most often used for automated market bidding for battery energy storage with mosaic, asset performance management for renewable generation fleets with nispera, operating grid scale energy storage systems. Of those, automated market bidding for battery energy storage with mosaic and asset performance management for renewable generation fleets with nispera are not what Aurora Solar is typically brought in for.
What can Fluence Energy Management do that Aurora Solar cannot?
Fluence Energy Management covers Battery management, Grid services optimization, Performance analytics, Remote monitoring. Aurora Solar covers 3D solar design, Shade analysis, LIDAR integration, Performance simulation. Both handle SSL encryption.

Related pages

Other head to heads