Energy · head to head
Aurora Solar vs AutoGrid Flex
AutoGrid Flex
Energy
AI-powered distributed energy resource management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Aurora Solar both published plans are single user, so a second designer means a second licence; AutoGrid Flex the Internet Archive's capture of AutoGrid's homepage on 30 December 2020 confirmed AutoGrid Flex is listed on AWS Marketplace to simplify procurement, alongside direct sales; no price figure is published on the vendor's own site, only a contact form.
- They diverge on capability: Aurora Solar covers 3D solar design, AutoGrid Flex covers DER optimization.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aurora Solar and AutoGrid Flex actually diverge.
| Attribute | Aurora Solar | AutoGrid Flex |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $135/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web, Mobile, Api |
| Founded | 2013 | 2011 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Energy).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aurora Solar
- 3D solar design
- Shade analysis
- LIDAR integration
- Performance simulation
- Sales proposals
- Financing options
- Permit packages
- NEC code compliance
Only in AutoGrid Flex
- DER optimization
- Virtual power plant
- Demand response
- AI forecasting
- Grid services
- EV charging management
- Battery storage optimization
- Real-time control
Both cover
- SOC2
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aurora Solar
- Designing and simulating residential and commercial solar installationsnot AutoGrid Flex
- Producing shade analysis and sales proposals for solar projectsnot AutoGrid Flex
AutoGrid Flex
- Virtual power plantnot Aurora Solar
- Demand flexibilitynot Aurora Solar
- Grid balancingnot Aurora Solar
- DER monetizationnot Aurora Solar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aurora Solar
- Both published plans are single user, so a second designer means a second licence
- Projects are capped at 50 a month on both Basic and Premium, so the tiers differ on features rather than volume
- LIDAR assisted modelling, shade reports and battery storage modelling all require Premium at $259 a month
- API access and integrations are Enterprise only, which is priced per project rather than per month
- Paying monthly rather than annually costs $288 more a year on Basic and $468 on Premium
AutoGrid Flex
- The Internet Archive's capture of AutoGrid's homepage on 30 December 2020 confirmed AutoGrid Flex is listed on AWS Marketplace to simplify procurement, alongside direct sales; no price figure is published on the vendor's own site, only a contact form.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aurora Solar
$135/month- Basic$159/month
- Tablet-friendly sales proposals
- Industry-leading design accuracy
- HD imagery
- Premium$259/month
- Tablet-friendly sales proposals
- Industry-leading design accuracy
- HD imagery
- Enterprise$null/project
- All Premium features
- AI-assisted site models
- APIs and integrations
AutoGrid Flex
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the AutoGrid Flex review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Aurora Solar if
- You need 3d solar design.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want shade analysis.
Choose AutoGrid Flex if
- You need der optimization.
- You work on Web, Mobile, Api.
- You also want virtual power plant.
Questions people ask
- Is Aurora Solar or AutoGrid Flex better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aurora Solar starts at $135/month and AutoGrid Flex at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aurora Solar or AutoGrid Flex?
- Aurora Solar starts at $135/month and AutoGrid Flex at On request.
- Does Aurora Solar or AutoGrid Flex run on more platforms?
- Aurora Solar runs on Web, Api. AutoGrid Flex runs on Web, Mobile, Api.
- What is Aurora Solar best used for?
- Aurora Solar is most often used for designing and simulating residential and commercial solar installations, producing shade analysis and sales proposals for solar projects. Of those, designing and simulating residential and commercial solar installations and producing shade analysis and sales proposals for solar projects are not what AutoGrid Flex is typically brought in for.
- What can Aurora Solar do that AutoGrid Flex cannot?
- Aurora Solar covers 3D solar design, Shade analysis, LIDAR integration, Performance simulation. AutoGrid Flex covers DER optimization, Virtual power plant, Demand response, AI forecasting. Both handle SOC2.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aurora Solar: How much does Aurora Solar cost per month?
Aurora Solar Basic costs $159/month billed monthly or $135/month billed annually (save $288/year). Premium costs $259/month monthly or $220/month annually (save $468/year). Enterprise pricing is custom per project. Monthly plans have no minimum commitment and can be cancelled at any billing period end. Annual plans require a one-year commitment.
SourceAurora Solar: What features does Aurora Solar Premium add over Basic?
Premium adds LIDAR-assisted modeling, bankable shade reports, and battery modeling for backup, self-consumption, and arbitrage scenarios. Both tiers include 50 projects per month and support 1 user.
SourceAurora Solar: How many users and projects can I have on Aurora Solar?
Basic and Premium plans support 1 user with a 50-project monthly limit. Enterprise plans support unlimited users and custom project limits; Enterprise pricing and terms are custom and determined through sales.
SourceRelated pages
More on Aurora Solar
More on AutoGrid Flex
Other head to heads
- Aurora Solar vs Helioscope
- Aurora Solar vs Azelio Energy Storage
- Aurora Solar vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- Aurora Solar vs HOMER Energy
- Aurora Solar vs Enphase Enlighten
- Aurora Solar vs AVEVA PI System
- Aurora Solar vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- Aurora Solar vs OSIsoft PI System
- Aurora Solar vs Sunrun EnergyBase
- Aurora Solar vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Aurora Solar vs ABB Ability
- Aurora Solar vs ETAP
- Aurora Solar vs Fluence Energy Management
- Aurora Solar vs GE Digital GridOS
- Aurora Solar vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- Aurora Solar vs Itron
- Aurora Solar vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- Aurora Solar vs Pulse Energy Software
- Aurora Solar vs Uplight
- Aurora Solar vs Generac Grid Services
- Aurora Solar vs Enel X DER Optimization
- Aurora Solar vs Stem Athena
- Aurora Solar vs Bidgely UtilityAI
- Aurora Solar vs Cognite Data Fusion
- Aurora Solar vs SunPower Monitoring
- Aurora Solar vs Trane Tracer Building Management
- Aurora Solar vs Veritiv Logistics Software
- Aurora Solar vs Wattwatchers EMS
- AutoGrid Flex vs Helioscope
- AutoGrid Flex vs Azelio Energy Storage
- AutoGrid Flex vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- AutoGrid Flex vs HOMER Energy
- AutoGrid Flex vs Enphase Enlighten
- AutoGrid Flex vs AVEVA PI System
- AutoGrid Flex vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- AutoGrid Flex vs OSIsoft PI System
- AutoGrid Flex vs Sunrun EnergyBase
- AutoGrid Flex vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- AutoGrid Flex vs ABB Ability
- AutoGrid Flex vs ETAP
- AutoGrid Flex vs Fluence Energy Management
- AutoGrid Flex vs GE Digital GridOS
- AutoGrid Flex vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- AutoGrid Flex vs Itron
- AutoGrid Flex vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- AutoGrid Flex vs Pulse Energy Software
- AutoGrid Flex vs Uplight
- AutoGrid Flex vs Generac Grid Services
- AutoGrid Flex vs Enel X DER Optimization
- AutoGrid Flex vs Stem Athena
- AutoGrid Flex vs Bidgely UtilityAI
- AutoGrid Flex vs Cognite Data Fusion
- AutoGrid Flex vs SunPower Monitoring
- AutoGrid Flex vs Trane Tracer Building Management
- AutoGrid Flex vs Veritiv Logistics Software
- AutoGrid Flex vs Wattwatchers EMS

