Energy · head to head
Aurora Solar vs iHawk by Cyberhawk

iHawk by Cyberhawk
Energy
Asset inspection data platform sold by a drone inspection service company, not standalone software
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Aurora Solar both published plans are single user, so a second designer means a second licence; iHawk by Cyberhawk cyberhawk's business is inspection services, so the platform is normally sold as part of a capture contract and the software line item cannot be compared cleanly against standalone asset inspection platforms
- They diverge on capability: Aurora Solar covers 3D solar design, iHawk by Cyberhawk covers Visual data management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aurora Solar and iHawk by Cyberhawk actually diverge.
| Attribute | Aurora Solar | iHawk by Cyberhawk |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $135/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web |
| Founded | 2013 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Energy).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aurora Solar
- 3D solar design
- Shade analysis
- LIDAR integration
- Performance simulation
- Sales proposals
- Financing options
- Permit packages
- NEC code compliance
Only in iHawk by Cyberhawk
- Visual data management
- Defect tagging and tracking
- Visualive AI review
- Geospatial layers
- Asset hierarchy
- Progress monitoring
- Reporting and export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aurora Solar
- Designing and simulating residential and commercial solar installationsnot iHawk by Cyberhawk
- Producing shade analysis and sales proposals for solar projectsnot iHawk by Cyberhawk
iHawk by Cyberhawk
- A transmission operator inspecting several thousand towers annually that needs defect history per structure rather than a folder of photographs per campaignnot Aurora Solar
- An offshore operator that wants flare tip and structural inspection imagery held against the same asset tags used in its maintenance systemnot Aurora Solar
- A capital project owner tracking construction progress from repeated aerial capture over a two year buildnot Aurora Solar
- A utility responding to a regulator that requires evidence of condition assessment across a defined asset populationnot Aurora Solar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aurora Solar
- Both published plans are single user, so a second designer means a second licence
- Projects are capped at 50 a month on both Basic and Premium, so the tiers differ on features rather than volume
- LIDAR assisted modelling, shade reports and battery storage modelling all require Premium at $259 a month
- API access and integrations are Enterprise only, which is priced per project rather than per month
- Paying monthly rather than annually costs $288 more a year on Basic and $468 on Premium
iHawk by Cyberhawk
- Cyberhawk's business is inspection services, so the platform is normally sold as part of a capture contract and the software line item cannot be compared cleanly against standalone asset inspection platforms
- Nothing is published about price, and because contracts bundle flights, processing and platform access, the recurring cost after the inspection campaign ends is often not clear at signature
- The value of the platform grows with the length of the historical series held in it, which makes switching increasingly expensive over time and gives the vendor leverage at renewal
- It is a review and management platform rather than an enterprise asset management system, so defect findings still need to reach SAP or Maximo to become work orders, and that integration is a project in its own right
- Automated defect detection reduces review effort but does not remove the need for qualified inspection engineers to sign off findings, so headcount savings are smaller than a technology-led business case usually assumes
Pricing, plan by plan
Aurora Solar
$135/month- Basic$159/month
- Tablet-friendly sales proposals
- Industry-leading design accuracy
- HD imagery
- Premium$259/month
- Tablet-friendly sales proposals
- Industry-leading design accuracy
- HD imagery
- Enterprise$null/project
- All Premium features
- AI-assisted site models
- APIs and integrations
iHawk by Cyberhawk
On request- iHawk platform$undefined/year
- Usually contracted together with Cyberhawk inspection services
- Priced by asset count, data volume and inspection programme scope
- Standalone platform licensing available on request but not the standard route
Which should you pick?
Choose Aurora Solar if
- You need 3d solar design.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want shade analysis.
Choose iHawk by Cyberhawk if
- You need visual data management.
- You also want defect tagging and tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Aurora Solar or iHawk by Cyberhawk better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aurora Solar starts at $135/month and iHawk by Cyberhawk at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aurora Solar or iHawk by Cyberhawk?
- Aurora Solar starts at $135/month and iHawk by Cyberhawk at On request.
- Does Aurora Solar or iHawk by Cyberhawk run on more platforms?
- Aurora Solar runs on Web, Api. iHawk by Cyberhawk runs on Web.
- What is Aurora Solar best used for?
- Aurora Solar is most often used for designing and simulating residential and commercial solar installations, producing shade analysis and sales proposals for solar projects. Of those, designing and simulating residential and commercial solar installations and producing shade analysis and sales proposals for solar projects are not what iHawk by Cyberhawk is typically brought in for.
- What can Aurora Solar do that iHawk by Cyberhawk cannot?
- Aurora Solar covers 3D solar design, Shade analysis, LIDAR integration, Performance simulation. iHawk by Cyberhawk covers Visual data management, Defect tagging and tracking, Visualive AI review, Geospatial layers.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aurora Solar: How much does Aurora Solar cost per month?
Aurora Solar Basic costs $159/month billed monthly or $135/month billed annually (save $288/year). Premium costs $259/month monthly or $220/month annually (save $468/year). Enterprise pricing is custom per project. Monthly plans have no minimum commitment and can be cancelled at any billing period end. Annual plans require a one-year commitment.
SourceiHawk by Cyberhawk: Can I buy iHawk without Cyberhawk's inspection services?
Ask explicitly. The company positions the platform as enterprise software, but its normal route to market is bundled with data capture, so standalone terms are negotiated rather than listed.
Aurora Solar: What features does Aurora Solar Premium add over Basic?
Premium adds LIDAR-assisted modeling, bankable shade reports, and battery modeling for backup, self-consumption, and arbitrage scenarios. Both tiers include 50 projects per month and support 1 user.
SourceiHawk by Cyberhawk: Who owns the inspection data?
That is contract-specific and should be settled before signature, including what format you receive on exit and whether historical defect tagging comes with you.
Aurora Solar: How many users and projects can I have on Aurora Solar?
Basic and Premium plans support 1 user with a 50-project monthly limit. Enterprise plans support unlimited users and custom project limits; Enterprise pricing and terms are custom and determined through sales.
SourceiHawk by Cyberhawk: What does it cost?
Not published. Expect pricing driven by asset count, data volume and the scope of the inspection programme.
iHawk by Cyberhawk: Does it replace an asset management system?
No. It manages inspection data and findings. Work orders and maintenance planning stay in SAP, Maximo or your equivalent.
Related pages
More on Aurora Solar
More on iHawk by Cyberhawk
Other head to heads
- Aurora Solar vs Helioscope
- Aurora Solar vs Azelio Energy Storage
- Aurora Solar vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- Aurora Solar vs HOMER Energy
- Aurora Solar vs Enphase Enlighten
- Aurora Solar vs AVEVA PI System
- Aurora Solar vs AutoGrid Flex
- Aurora Solar vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- Aurora Solar vs OSIsoft PI System
- Aurora Solar vs Sunrun EnergyBase
- Aurora Solar vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Aurora Solar vs ABB Ability
- Aurora Solar vs ETAP
- Aurora Solar vs Fluence Energy Management
- Aurora Solar vs GE Digital GridOS
- Aurora Solar vs Itron
- Aurora Solar vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- Aurora Solar vs SolarWinds
- Aurora Solar vs SAP for Utilities
- Aurora Solar vs Cognite Data Fusion
- Aurora Solar vs Wood Mackenzie Lens
- Aurora Solar vs Enverus Energy Analytics
- Aurora Solar vs Enerex
- Aurora Solar vs SunPower Monitoring
- Aurora Solar vs Uplight
- Aurora Solar vs Trane Tracer Building Management
- Aurora Solar vs Veritiv Logistics Software
- Aurora Solar vs Wattwatchers EMS
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs Helioscope
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs Azelio Energy Storage
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs HOMER Energy
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs Enphase Enlighten
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs AVEVA PI System
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs AutoGrid Flex
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs OSIsoft PI System
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs Sunrun EnergyBase
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs ABB Ability
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs ETAP
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs Fluence Energy Management
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs GE Digital GridOS
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs Itron
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs Landis+Gyr Gridstream
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs SolarWinds
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs SAP for Utilities
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs Cognite Data Fusion
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs Wood Mackenzie Lens
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs Enverus Energy Analytics
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs Enerex
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs SunPower Monitoring
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs Uplight
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs Trane Tracer Building Management
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs Veritiv Logistics Software
- iHawk by Cyberhawk vs Wattwatchers EMS

