Aurora Solar vs SMA Energy

A comprehensive head-to-head comparison of two leading energy & utilities solutions in 2026. Compare features, pricing, ratings, and more to find the right fit.

Quick Verdict

Choose Aurora Solar if you need 3D solar design and prefer comprehensive paid features. Choose SMA Energy if you prioritize Real-time monitoring and want a free tier to start. Aurora Solar has a higher user rating (4.6 vs 4.3).

Aurora Solar vs SMA Energy: At a Glance

CriteriaAurora SolarSMA Energy
User Rating
4.6
4.3
Pricing$250/monthFree
Pricing Modelsubscriptionfree
Free Plan
PlatformsWeb, ApiWeb, Mobile
CategoryEnergy & UtilitiesEnergy & Utilities
Founded20131981

Feature Comparison: Aurora Solar vs SMA Energy

FeatureAurora SolarSMA Energy
3D solar design
Shade analysis
LIDAR integration
Performance simulation
Sales proposals
Financing options
Permit packages
NEC code compliance
Salesforce
HubSpot
Zapier
Google Earth
Nearmap
Eagleview
Sunrun
Real-time monitoring
Battery management
Energy analytics
Mobile portal
System optimization
SSL encryption
Cloud deployment
Web support
Mobile support
English language support
German language support

Aurora Solar vs SMA Energy: Pricing Breakdown

Aurora Solar Pricing

Model: subscription

Starter$250/month
  • Basic design tools
  • Sales mode
  • Shade analysis
  • System proposals
Pro$500/month
  • Advanced LIDAR integration
  • Performance simulation
  • Custom branding
  • API access
Enterprise$null/month
  • Unlimited users
  • Advanced analytics
  • Custom integrations
  • Dedicated support

SMA Energy Pricing

Model: free

Starting at Free. View full pricing details

Pros and Cons

Aurora Solar

Pros

  • Highly rated by users (4.6/5)
  • Rich feature set with 15+ capabilities
  • Strong 3D solar design functionality
  • Strong Shade analysis functionality

Cons

  • No free plan available
  • May require time to learn advanced features

SMA Energy

Pros

  • Highly rated by users (4.3/5)
  • Free plan available to get started
  • Rich feature set with 11+ capabilities
  • Strong Real-time monitoring functionality
  • Strong Battery management functionality

Cons

  • May require time to learn advanced features

Who Should Use Aurora Solar vs SMA Energy?

Choose Aurora Solar if you:

  • Need 3D solar design
  • Have a budget of $250/month+
  • Work primarily on Web and Api
  • Value Shade analysis
View Aurora Solar Details

Choose SMA Energy if you:

  • Need Real-time monitoring
  • Want to start for free
  • Work primarily on Web and Mobile
  • Value Battery management
View SMA Energy Details

Frequently Asked Questions: Aurora Solar vs SMA Energy

Is Aurora Solar better than SMA Energy?

It depends on your needs. Aurora Solar has a 4.6/5 user rating while SMA Energy has 4.3/5. Aurora Solar excels in 3D solar design and Shade analysis, while SMA Energy stands out with Real-time monitoring and Battery management. Consider your budget ($250/month vs Free), platform needs, and specific feature requirements.

Which is cheaper, Aurora Solar or SMA Energy?

Aurora Solar starts at $250/month. SMA Energy offers a free plan and starts at Free. SMA Energy has a clear pricing advantage with its free tier.

Can I use Aurora Solar and SMA Energy together?

While both are energy & utilities tools, some teams use complementary software together. Check each product's API and integration capabilities for compatibility. However, most users find that one solution covers their core energy & utilities needs.

What are the main differences between Aurora Solar and SMA Energy?

The key differences include: pricing model (subscription vs free), platform support (Web, Api vs Web, Mobile), and feature focus. Aurora Solar emphasizes 3D solar design, Shade analysis, LIDAR integration while SMA Energy focuses on Real-time monitoring, Battery management, Energy analytics. User ratings differ slightly: 4.6 vs 4.3 out of 5.

Ready to choose?

Explore detailed reviews, user ratings, and pricing for both Aurora Solar and SMA Energy.