Automation Integration · head to head
Flowise vs Orkes

Orkes
Automation Integration
Commercial Conductor, now the maintainer of the workflow engine Netflix archived
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Flowise enterprise tier requires custom pricing with no published rates; Orkes netflix archived the Conductor repository in December 2023 and Orkes took over maintenance, so the large-company backing that justified many original adoptions no longer exists.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Flowise and Orkes actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Flowise
Nothing recorded that Orkes does not also cover.
Only in Orkes
- JSON workflow definitions
- Polyglot workers
- Visual workflow builder
- AI and LLM tasks
- Human tasks
- Event handlers
- RBAC and secrets
- Hosted or self-hosted
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Flowise
- Building multi-agent systems with orchestrated workflowsnot Orkes
- Creating chatbots that retrieve knowledge from uploaded documentsnot Orkes
- Implementing human-in-the-loop approval for AI agent decisionsnot Orkes
- Deploying conversational AI without writing backend codenot Orkes
Orkes
- A microservices estate that needs orchestration across services written in different languages without a shared SDKnot Flowise
- A team already running Conductor OSS that wants a supported distribution now that Netflix has stopped maintaining itnot Flowise
- An AI platform composing agent steps, model calls and vector lookups as versioned workflow definitionsnot Flowise
- A business process needing human approval steps interleaved with automated service callsnot Flowise
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Flowise
- Enterprise tier requires custom pricing with no published rates
Orkes
- Netflix archived the Conductor repository in December 2023 and Orkes took over maintenance, so the large-company backing that justified many original adoptions no longer exists.
- Enterprise pricing is entirely unpublished, and the only free option is explicitly a prototyping sandbox whose limits can change at any time, so there is no supported low-cost entry point.
- Self-hosting Conductor OSS in production means operating the engine plus its persistence and indexing dependencies, typically Postgres or Cassandra with Elasticsearch, which is a substantial platform commitment.
- JSON workflow definitions are language agnostic but verbose and awkward to test, and teams accustomed to defining workflows in code find them a step backwards in developer experience.
- Orkes is a small company whose commercial future is tied to a single open source project it also maintains, which concentrates both vendor and project risk in the same place.
Pricing, plan by plan
Flowise
Free- FreeFree
- 2 Flows & Assistants
- 100 predictions per month
- 5 MB storage
- Starter$35/month
- Unlimited flows & assistants
- 10,000 predictions per month
- 1 GB storage
- Pro$65/month
- 50,000 predictions per month
- 10 GB storage
- Unlimited workspaces
Orkes
Free- Developer EditionFree
- All Conductor OSS features plus enterprise capabilities
- Sandbox for prototyping only
- Rate limits and resources may change without notice
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Availability SLA up to 99.99%
- Orkes-hosted or customer-hosted deployment
- Dedicated technical account manager
Which should you pick?
Choose Orkes if
- You need json workflow definitions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want polyglot workers.
Questions people ask
- Is Flowise or Orkes better?
- Neither clearly leads. Flowise starts at Free and Orkes at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Flowise or Orkes?
- Flowise starts at Free and Orkes at Free.
- Does Flowise or Orkes run on more platforms?
- Flowise runs on Web. Orkes runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- Can I use Flowise for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Flowise best used for?
- Flowise is most often used for building multi-agent systems with orchestrated workflows, creating chatbots that retrieve knowledge from uploaded documents, implementing human-in-the-loop approval for ai agent decisions, deploying conversational ai without writing backend code. Of those, building multi-agent systems with orchestrated workflows and creating chatbots that retrieve knowledge from uploaded documents are not what Orkes is typically brought in for.
- What can Flowise do that Orkes cannot?
- Orkes covers JSON workflow definitions, Polyglot workers, Visual workflow builder, AI and LLM tasks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Flowise: Does Flowise have a free tier?
Yes, Flowise offers a free plan with 2 flows and assistants, 100 predictions per month, 5 MB storage, and community support.
SourceOrkes: Does Netflix still maintain Conductor?
No. Netflix archived its repository in December 2023. The open source project continues at conductor-oss under Apache 2.0, maintained by Orkes.
Flowise: What is Flowise's Starter plan pricing?
The Starter plan costs $35 per month (first month free) and includes unlimited flows and assistants, 10,000 predictions per month, and 1 GB storage.
SourceOrkes: Is there a free production tier?
No. The Developer Edition is a sandbox that the vendor states is unsuitable for production. Self-hosting Conductor OSS is the free production route.
Flowise: How does Flowise charge for additional users?
Additional users on the Pro plan cost $15 per user per month. The Pro plan supports 5+ users with this per-user add-on pricing.
SourceOrkes: What does Enterprise cost?
Nothing is published; it is quoted by deployment and support requirements.
Orkes: How does it compare with Temporal?
Conductor uses declarative JSON workflow definitions and external workers; Temporal defines workflows in code. Temporal has the larger community.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Flowise vs n8n
- Flowise vs Zapier
- Flowise vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Flowise vs MuleSoft
- Flowise vs Parabola
- Flowise vs RudderStack
- Flowise vs Windmill
- Flowise vs Trigger.dev
- Flowise vs Temporal
- Flowise vs Airbyte
- Flowise vs Inngest
- Flowise vs Dagster
- Flowise vs Informatica
- Flowise vs Integromat
- Flowise vs jBPM
- Flowise vs Kogito
- Flowise vs Letta
- Flowise vs Lytics
- Flowise vs Hatchet
- Flowise vs Autonoly
- Flowise vs Meltano
- Flowise vs Camunda
- Flowise vs Flowable
- Flowise vs Nango
- Flowise vs Activiti
- Flowise vs Cyclr
- Flowise vs Hightouch
- Flowise vs Jitterbit
- Flowise vs Pipedream
- Flowise vs Tray.io
- Orkes vs n8n
- Orkes vs Zapier
- Orkes vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Orkes vs MuleSoft
- Orkes vs Parabola
- Orkes vs RudderStack
- Orkes vs Windmill
- Orkes vs Trigger.dev
- Orkes vs Temporal
- Orkes vs Airbyte
- Orkes vs Inngest
- Orkes vs Dagster
- Orkes vs Informatica
- Orkes vs Integromat
- Orkes vs jBPM
- Orkes vs Kogito
- Orkes vs Letta
- Orkes vs Lytics
- Orkes vs Hatchet
- Orkes vs Autonoly
- Orkes vs Meltano
- Orkes vs Camunda
- Orkes vs Flowable
- Orkes vs Nango
- Orkes vs Activiti
- Orkes vs Cyclr
- Orkes vs Hightouch
- Orkes vs Jitterbit
- Orkes vs Pipedream
- Orkes vs Tray.io

