Automation Integration · head to head
Flowable vs Stitch

Flowable
Automation Integration
Apache 2.0 BPMN, CMMN and DMN engine from the team that originally built Activiti
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Stitch
Automation Integration
Simple, powerful ETL built for data teams
- From
- $100/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Flowable has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Flowable the open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.; Stitch the Standard plan allows a single destination, so loading the same data into two warehouses requires the $1,500 a month Advanced plan
- They diverge on capability: Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, Stitch covers Data replication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Flowable and Stitch actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Flowable
- BPMN 2.0 engine
- CMMN case management
- DMN decision tables
- Spring Boot integration
- Modelling studio
- Task and case application
- REST APIs
- History and audit
Only in Stitch
- Data replication
- Schema detection
- Data transformation
- Real-time sync
- Monitoring
- Error handling
- Incremental updates
- 200+ connectors
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Flowable
- An insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and BPMN alone cannot express itnot Stitch
- A bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing Spring Boot estate rather than buying a separate platformnot Stitch
- A team leaving Activiti or jBPM that wants the same API family with active commercial maintenancenot Stitch
- A regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisorsnot Stitch
Stitch
- Data integration and ETL (Extract, Transform, Load)not Flowable
- Data pipeline managementnot Flowable
- Cloud data warehouse loadingnot Flowable
- Real-time data synchronizationnot Flowable
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Flowable
- The open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.
- It expects Java engineering capacity; teams looking for a business-user low-code automation tool will find the modelling and deployment cycle far too technical.
- Enterprise pricing is not published and is quoted per deployment, leaving buyers without a benchmark against Camunda or IBM alternatives.
- The Activiti fork left three engines with related APIs and overlapping documentation in circulation, and search results routinely return advice for the wrong one.
- Flowable AG is a small Swiss company relative to its competitors, so the partner network, training market and pool of engineers with production experience are all limited outside Europe.
Stitch
- The Standard plan allows a single destination, so loading the same data into two warehouses requires the $1,500 a month Advanced plan
- The Advanced and Premium plans are billed annually only
- The jump from Standard to Advanced is from $100 a month to $1,500
- Standard is limited to 10 sources and 5 users
- HIPAA support and private connectivity options such as VPN, AWS PrivateLink and VPC peering are excluded from Standard
- Published prices are US only, with international pricing available on request
Pricing, plan by plan
Flowable
Free- Flowable Open SourceFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines
- Embeddable Java library or standalone apps
- No modelling studio or enterprise applications
- Flowable Enterprise$undefined/year
- Modelling studio, work application and admin console
- Connectors, forms and advanced identity management
- Support with SLA and version maintenance
Stitch
$100/month- Standard$100/month
- 5-300 million rows per month (configurable)
- 1 destination
- 10 standard sources
- Advanced$1500/month
- 100 million rows per month
- 3 destinations
- Unlimited enterprise sources
- Premium$3000/month
- 1 billion rows per month
- 5 destinations
- Unlimited enterprise sources
Which should you pick?
Choose Flowable if
- You need bpmn 2.0 engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want cmmn case management.
Choose Stitch if
- You need data replication.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want schema detection.
Questions people ask
- Is Flowable or Stitch better?
- Neither clearly leads. Flowable starts at Free and Stitch at $100/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Flowable or Stitch?
- Flowable has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Flowable and $100/month for Stitch.
- Does Flowable or Stitch run on more platforms?
- Flowable runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. Stitch runs on Web, Cloud.
- Can I use Flowable for free?
- Yes. Flowable has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Stitch starts at $100/month.
- What is Flowable best used for?
- Flowable is most often used for an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it, a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform, a team leaving activiti or jbpm that wants the same api family with active commercial maintenance, a regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisors. Of those, an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it and a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform are not what Stitch is typically brought in for.
- What can Flowable do that Stitch cannot?
- Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, CMMN case management, DMN decision tables, Spring Boot integration. Stitch covers Data replication, Schema detection, Data transformation, Real-time sync.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Flowable: Is Flowable open source?
Yes, the BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines are Apache 2.0. The modelling studio and enterprise applications are commercial.
Stitch: How much does Stitch cost?
Stitch's usage-based pricing starts at $100/month for the Standard plan. Advanced tier is $1,500/month (annual billing), and Premium is $3,000/month (annual billing). Pricing is based on rows per month and data destinations.
SourceFlowable: How does it relate to Activiti and jBPM?
The same core developers built jBPM, then Activiti, then forked Activiti in 2016 to create Flowable.
Stitch: Does Stitch offer a free trial?
Yes, Stitch provides a 14-day free trial with no credit card required.
SourceFlowable: What does Flowable Enterprise cost?
Nothing is published. It is quoted per deployment by the vendor.
Stitch: How many rows can I process with each Stitch plan?
Standard plan is configurable from 5 to 300 million rows per month. Advanced includes 100 million rows per month. Premium includes 1 billion rows per month. Additional rows are available for customization.
SourceFlowable: Why choose it over Camunda?
CMMN case management is a first-class engine, which matters when work is exception-driven rather than a fixed sequence.
Stitch: Is Stitch pricing available outside the US?
Stitch publishes pricing for US customers only. International pricing requires contacting Stitch sales directly.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Flowable vs Temporal
- Flowable vs Nintex
- Flowable vs jBPM
- Flowable vs Activiti
- Flowable vs Camunda
- Flowable vs Kogito
- Flowable vs Airbyte
- Flowable vs Nango
- Flowable vs Windmill
- Flowable vs Hatchet
- Flowable vs Meltano
- Flowable vs RudderStack
- Flowable vs HighLevel
- Flowable vs Grouparoo
- Flowable vs Hevo Data
- Flowable vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Flowable vs IBM MQ
- Flowable vs Zapier
- Flowable vs n8n
- Flowable vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Flowable vs MuleSoft
- Flowable vs Fivetran
- Flowable vs Informatica
- Flowable vs Lytics
- Flowable vs Hightouch
- Flowable vs Census
- Flowable vs SnapLogic
- Flowable vs Tealium
- Flowable vs Tines
- Flowable vs Trigger.dev
- Flowable vs Xano
- Flowable vs Paragon
- Stitch vs Temporal
- Stitch vs Nintex
- Stitch vs jBPM
- Stitch vs Activiti
- Stitch vs Camunda
- Stitch vs Kogito
- Stitch vs Airbyte
- Stitch vs Nango
- Stitch vs Windmill
- Stitch vs Hatchet
- Stitch vs Meltano
- Stitch vs RudderStack
- Stitch vs HighLevel
- Stitch vs Grouparoo
- Stitch vs Hevo Data
- Stitch vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Stitch vs IBM MQ
- Stitch vs Zapier
- Stitch vs n8n
- Stitch vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Stitch vs MuleSoft
- Stitch vs Fivetran
- Stitch vs Informatica
- Stitch vs Lytics
- Stitch vs Hightouch
- Stitch vs Census
- Stitch vs SnapLogic
- Stitch vs Tealium
- Stitch vs Tines
- Stitch vs Trigger.dev
- Stitch vs Xano
- Stitch vs Paragon
