Automation Integration · head to head
Flowable vs Metabase

Flowable
Automation Integration
Apache 2.0 BPMN, CMMN and DMN engine from the team that originally built Activiti
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Flowable the open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.; Metabase aI Service charges $3.75 per 1 million tokens (after 1M free tokens included)
- They diverge on capability: Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, Metabase covers No-code Query Builder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Flowable and Metabase actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Flowable
- BPMN 2.0 engine
- CMMN case management
- DMN decision tables
- Spring Boot integration
- Modelling studio
- Task and case application
- REST APIs
- History and audit
Only in Metabase
- No-code Query Builder
- SQL Editor
- Interactive Dashboards
- Alerts
- Embedding
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- MongoDB
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Flowable
- An insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and BPMN alone cannot express itnot Metabase
- A bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing Spring Boot estate rather than buying a separate platformnot Metabase
- A team leaving Activiti or jBPM that wants the same API family with active commercial maintenancenot Metabase
- A regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisorsnot Metabase
Metabase
- Business intelligence and data exploration for non-technical usersnot Flowable
- Embedded analytics for SaaS applicationsnot Flowable
- Self-service reporting and dashboard creationnot Flowable
- Integration with 40+ data sources including cloud warehousesnot Flowable
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Flowable
- The open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.
- It expects Java engineering capacity; teams looking for a business-user low-code automation tool will find the modelling and deployment cycle far too technical.
- Enterprise pricing is not published and is quoted per deployment, leaving buyers without a benchmark against Camunda or IBM alternatives.
- The Activiti fork left three engines with related APIs and overlapping documentation in circulation, and search results routinely return advice for the wrong one.
- Flowable AG is a small Swiss company relative to its competitors, so the partner network, training market and pool of engineers with production experience are all limited outside Europe.
Metabase
- AI Service charges $3.75 per 1 million tokens (after 1M free tokens included)
- Transforms cost $0.01 per run after 1,000 included runs per month
- Advanced Transforms cost $0.02 per run after included allocation
- Storage overages start at $2 per 1M rows (1M rows free)
- All yearly plans offer 10% discount versus monthly, incentivizing annual commitment
Pricing, plan by plan
Flowable
Free- Flowable Open SourceFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines
- Embeddable Java library or standalone apps
- No modelling studio or enterprise applications
- Flowable Enterprise$undefined/year
- Modelling studio, work application and admin console
- Connectors, forms and advanced identity management
- Support with SLA and version maintenance
Metabase
Free- Open SourceFree
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited questions and dashboards
- AI-powered query generation
- Starter$90/month
- Email and chat support
- $100/month standard monthly billing
- 20+ data connectors
- Pro$517.5/month
- $575/month standard monthly
- Row/column-level permissions
- SSO
- Enterprise$20000/year
- Dedicated success engineer
- 1-day support response SLA
- Air-gapped deployment
Which should you pick?
Choose Flowable if
- You need bpmn 2.0 engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want cmmn case management.
Choose Metabase if
- You need no-code query builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted cloud.
- You also want sql editor.
Questions people ask
- Is Flowable or Metabase better?
- Neither clearly leads. Flowable starts at Free and Metabase at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Flowable or Metabase?
- Flowable starts at Free and Metabase at Free.
- Does Flowable or Metabase run on more platforms?
- Flowable runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. Metabase runs on Web, Self-hosted cloud.
- Can I use Flowable for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Flowable best used for?
- Flowable is most often used for an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it, a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform, a team leaving activiti or jbpm that wants the same api family with active commercial maintenance, a regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisors. Of those, an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it and a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform are not what Metabase is typically brought in for.
- What can Flowable do that Metabase cannot?
- Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, CMMN case management, DMN decision tables, Spring Boot integration. Metabase covers No-code Query Builder, SQL Editor, Interactive Dashboards, Alerts.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Flowable: Is Flowable open source?
Yes, the BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines are Apache 2.0. The modelling studio and enterprise applications are commercial.
Metabase: How much does Metabase cost?
Metabase Open Source is free for self-hosted deployments with unlimited users and dashboards. Cloud-hosted Starter tier costs $90/month annually ($100/month monthly) with Pro at $517.50/month annually ($575/month monthly). Enterprise plans start at $20,000 per year.
SourceFlowable: How does it relate to Activiti and jBPM?
The same core developers built jBPM, then Activiti, then forked Activiti in 2016 to create Flowable.
Metabase: Does Metabase charge for additional users?
Yes, Metabase charges per-user fees beyond included users. Starter includes 5 users at $6 per additional user per month. Pro includes 10 users at $12 per additional user per month. Enterprise pricing is custom.
SourceFlowable: What does Flowable Enterprise cost?
Nothing is published. It is quoted per deployment by the vendor.
Metabase: What usage-based fees does Metabase charge?
Metabase charges $3.75 per 1 million tokens for AI services (after 1M free tokens), $0.01 per transform run after 1,000 included per month, $0.02 for advanced transforms, and storage overages at $2 per 1M rows beyond the included 1M rows.
SourceFlowable: Why choose it over Camunda?
CMMN case management is a first-class engine, which matters when work is exception-driven rather than a fixed sequence.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Flowable vs Temporal
- Flowable vs Nintex
- Flowable vs jBPM
- Flowable vs Activiti
- Flowable vs Camunda
- Flowable vs Kogito
- Flowable vs Airbyte
- Flowable vs Nango
- Flowable vs Windmill
- Flowable vs Hatchet
- Flowable vs Meltano
- Flowable vs RudderStack
- Flowable vs HighLevel
- Flowable vs Grouparoo
- Flowable vs Hevo Data
- Flowable vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Flowable vs IBM MQ
- Flowable vs Apache Superset
- Flowable vs Redash
- Flowable vs Tableau
- Flowable vs Looker
- Flowable vs Sigma Computing
- Flowable vs Equals
- Flowable vs Fibery
- Flowable vs Baserow
- Flowable vs NocoDB
- Flowable vs Budibase
- Flowable vs Quadratic
- Flowable vs Google Sheets
- Flowable vs SeaTable
- Flowable vs Teable
- Flowable vs APITable
- Flowable vs Coefficient
- Flowable vs Cube Software
- Metabase vs Temporal
- Metabase vs Nintex
- Metabase vs jBPM
- Metabase vs Activiti
- Metabase vs Camunda
- Metabase vs Kogito
- Metabase vs Airbyte
- Metabase vs Nango
- Metabase vs Windmill
- Metabase vs Hatchet
- Metabase vs Meltano
- Metabase vs RudderStack
- Metabase vs HighLevel
- Metabase vs Grouparoo
- Metabase vs Hevo Data
- Metabase vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Metabase vs IBM MQ
- Metabase vs Apache Superset
- Metabase vs Redash
- Metabase vs Tableau
- Metabase vs Looker
- Metabase vs Sigma Computing
- Metabase vs Equals
- Metabase vs Fibery
- Metabase vs Baserow
- Metabase vs NocoDB
- Metabase vs Budibase
- Metabase vs Quadratic
- Metabase vs Google Sheets
- Metabase vs SeaTable
- Metabase vs Teable
- Metabase vs APITable
- Metabase vs Coefficient
- Metabase vs Cube Software

