Mining · head to head
FLAC3D vs MineSight
FLAC3D
Mining
3D finite difference software for geotechnical engineering
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FLAC3D the FLAC3D product page publishes no price and routes buyers to a quote request or an external software store; MineSight mineSight (now part of Hexagon Mining) sells time-limited lease licenses rather than perpetual seats for exploration-stage users: License to Explore is scoped explicitly to "the life of a drilling campaign" and comes as two separate products, HxM Explorer and HxM Modeler, with additional functionality (UAV point-cloud surface meshing, a QAQC module) sold as further add-ons rather than included (archived press release, 6 March 2016)
- They diverge on capability: FLAC3D covers 3D finite difference modeling, MineSight covers Geological modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FLAC3D and MineSight actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining), founded (1981).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FLAC3D
- 3D finite difference modeling
- Stress-strain analysis
- Dynamic analysis
- Coupled flow analysis
- Mining-specific features
- GeoStudio
- Leapfrog
- Python scripting
Only in MineSight
- Geological modeling
- 3D mine design
- Production scheduling
- Resource estimation
- Operations planning
- ArcGIS
- SAP
- Oracle
Both cover
- AutoCAD
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FLAC3D
- Three dimensional continuum modelling of soil and rock behaviournot MineSight
- Analysing underground excavation and mine stability including cavingnot MineSight
- Coupled thermal, dynamic and creep analysis of geotechnical structuresnot MineSight
MineSight
- Mine planningnot FLAC3D
- Resource schedulingnot FLAC3D
- Pit designnot FLAC3D
- Underground developmentnot FLAC3D
- Production optimizationnot FLAC3D
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FLAC3D
- The FLAC3D product page publishes no price and routes buyers to a quote request or an external software store
- Advanced capabilities including Dynamics, Thermal, Creep and IMASS are optional modules sold separately from the base licence
- Licence portability depends on a physical USB key or a web licence managed centrally, rather than a simple sign in
- One licence permits only two simultaneous instances on the same computer
MineSight
- MineSight (now part of Hexagon Mining) sells time-limited lease licenses rather than perpetual seats for exploration-stage users: License to Explore is scoped explicitly to "the life of a drilling campaign" and comes as two separate products, HxM Explorer and HxM Modeler, with additional functionality (UAV point-cloud surface meshing, a QAQC module) sold as further add-ons rather than included (archived press release, 6 March 2016)
Pricing, plan by plan
FLAC3D
On request- FLAC3D Professional$22000/year
- 3D finite difference analysis
- Slope stability
- Mine design
MineSight
On request- MineSight Core$18000/year
- Geological modeling
- Mine design
- Block modeling
- MineSight Advanced$35000/year
- Production scheduling
- Resource estimation
- Advanced optimization
Which should you pick?
Choose FLAC3D if
- You need 3d finite difference modeling.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want stress-strain analysis.
Choose MineSight if
- You need geological modeling.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want 3d mine design.
Questions people ask
- Is FLAC3D or MineSight better?
- Neither clearly leads. FLAC3D starts at On request and MineSight at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FLAC3D or MineSight?
- FLAC3D starts at On request and MineSight at On request.
- Does FLAC3D or MineSight run on more platforms?
- FLAC3D runs on Windows, Linux. MineSight runs on Windows.
- What is FLAC3D best used for?
- FLAC3D is most often used for three dimensional continuum modelling of soil and rock behaviour, analysing underground excavation and mine stability including caving, coupled thermal, dynamic and creep analysis of geotechnical structures. Of those, three dimensional continuum modelling of soil and rock behaviour and analysing underground excavation and mine stability including caving are not what MineSight is typically brought in for.
- What can FLAC3D do that MineSight cannot?
- FLAC3D covers 3D finite difference modeling, Stress-strain analysis, Dynamic analysis, Coupled flow analysis. MineSight covers Geological modeling, 3D mine design, Production scheduling, Resource estimation. Both handle AutoCAD, Windows support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FLAC3D: What licensing models does FLAC3D offer?
FLAC3D offers perpetual licenses (one-time purchase) and subscription licenses (recurring payments). Web-based license management allows central organizational control.
SourceFLAC3D: Can I run multiple instances of FLAC3D with one license?
Yes. FLAC3D licenses allow two instances to run simultaneously on the same computer.
SourceFLAC3D: How do I get a free trial or demo of FLAC3D?
FLAC3D offers a free software demo download. Visitors can request the demo through the product page or contact the company directly.
SourceFLAC3D: What is the pricing for FLAC3D?
Specific pricing is not listed on the product page. Users must request a quote through the 'REQUEST A QUOTE' button or purchase through the FastSpring payment processor.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- FLAC3D vs Leapfrog Geo
- FLAC3D vs Caterpillar MineStar
- FLAC3D vs Deswik Suite
- FLAC3D vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- FLAC3D vs GeoStudio
- FLAC3D vs PLAXIS
- FLAC3D vs Maptek I-Site
- FLAC3D vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- FLAC3D vs Geoscience ANALYST
- FLAC3D vs Datamine
- FLAC3D vs Minemax
- FLAC3D vs OptiMine
- FLAC3D vs Promine
- FLAC3D vs Surpac
- FLAC3D vs acQuire GIM Suite
- FLAC3D vs RS2
- FLAC3D vs Vulcan
- FLAC3D vs Datamine Studio RM
- FLAC3D vs K-MINE
- FLAC3D vs Carlson Mining
- FLAC3D vs RPMGlobal TALPAC
- FLAC3D vs MineRP
- FLAC3D vs Micromine
- FLAC3D vs CorePlan
- FLAC3D vs Cority EHS
- FLAC3D vs Enablon EHS
- FLAC3D vs Envirosuite
- FLAC3D vs EQuIS Enterprise
- MineSight vs Leapfrog Geo
- MineSight vs Caterpillar MineStar
- MineSight vs Deswik Suite
- MineSight vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- MineSight vs GeoStudio
- MineSight vs PLAXIS
- MineSight vs Maptek I-Site
- MineSight vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- MineSight vs Geoscience ANALYST
- MineSight vs Datamine
- MineSight vs Minemax
- MineSight vs OptiMine
- MineSight vs Promine
- MineSight vs Surpac
- MineSight vs acQuire GIM Suite
- MineSight vs RS2
- MineSight vs Vulcan
- MineSight vs Datamine Studio RM
- MineSight vs K-MINE
- MineSight vs Carlson Mining
- MineSight vs RPMGlobal TALPAC
- MineSight vs MineRP
- MineSight vs Micromine
- MineSight vs CorePlan
- MineSight vs Cority EHS
- MineSight vs Enablon EHS
- MineSight vs Envirosuite
- MineSight vs EQuIS Enterprise

