Mining · head to head
CorePlan vs FLAC3D

CorePlan
Mining
Drilling programme management for mineral exploration teams and drilling contractors
- From
- $1350/month
- Rated
- -
FLAC3D
Mining
3D finite difference software for geotechnical engineering
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CorePlan pricing is usage based on plods or shifts and billed annually with overage calculated monthly, so an intense drilling quarter generates an unbudgeted overage invoice, and finance teams that need a fixed annual number will struggle to get one.; FLAC3D the FLAC3D product page publishes no price and routes buyers to a quote request or an external software store
- They diverge on capability: CorePlan covers Digital plods, FLAC3D covers 3D finite difference modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CorePlan and FLAC3D actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CorePlan
- Digital plods
- Rig scheduling
- Contractor reconciliation
- Sample and core tracking
- Field Operations module
- Advanced Analytics
- Forms subscription
- Interoperability service
Only in FLAC3D
- 3D finite difference modeling
- Stress-strain analysis
- Dynamic analysis
- Coupled flow analysis
- Mining-specific features
- GeoStudio
- AutoCAD
- Leapfrog
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CorePlan
- A junior explorer running a two rig programme that wants cost per metre visible weekly instead of when the contractor invoice arrivesnot FLAC3D
- A drilling contractor with crews across several client sites submitting plods digitally to cut invoice disputesnot FLAC3D
- An exploration manager reconciling contractor billing against recorded shift hours before approving paymentnot FLAC3D
- A multi project mid tier miner consolidating hole planning and sample dispatch across sites that currently each run their own spreadsheetnot FLAC3D
FLAC3D
- Three dimensional continuum modelling of soil and rock behaviournot CorePlan
- Analysing underground excavation and mine stability including cavingnot CorePlan
- Coupled thermal, dynamic and creep analysis of geotechnical structuresnot CorePlan
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CorePlan
- Pricing is usage based on plods or shifts and billed annually with overage calculated monthly, so an intense drilling quarter generates an unbudgeted overage invoice, and finance teams that need a fixed annual number will struggle to get one.
- Only the Starter tier price is published; Professional, Enterprise and Corporate are all quote only, so comparing CorePlan against a competitor requires entering a sales process before you know the number.
- Core modules are unbundled: field operations, advanced analytics and custom forms are separately priced add-ons that each start in the hundreds of dollars per month, so the realistic monthly cost is well above the advertised entry price.
- It is a drilling operations system, not a geological database or modelling package, so it must sit alongside acQuire, Datashed or equivalent and the integration between them is a project rather than a switch.
- The customer base and support depth are concentrated in Australia and the company is small and venture funded, which means teams in the Americas or Africa get thinner local implementation support and carry the usual supplier concentration risk on a system that sits in the middle of drilling spend.
FLAC3D
- The FLAC3D product page publishes no price and routes buyers to a quote request or an external software store
- Advanced capabilities including Dynamics, Thermal, Creep and IMASS are optional modules sold separately from the base licence
- Licence portability depends on a physical USB key or a web licence managed centrally, rather than a simple sign in
- One licence permits only two simultaneous instances on the same computer
Pricing, plan by plan
CorePlan
$1350/month- Starter$1350/month
- One project
- Up to two rigs
- Digital plods and rig scheduling
- Professional$undefined/month
- Multi-project management for mid-tier explorers
- Higher rig and shift allowances
- Priced on quotation
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Large-scale operations
- Complex data integration
- Priced on quotation
- Field Operations add-on$800/month
- Pre-starts and inspections
- Field compliance forms
- From this price
FLAC3D
On request- FLAC3D Professional$22000/year
- 3D finite difference analysis
- Slope stability
- Mine design
Which should you pick?
Choose CorePlan if
- You need digital plods.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want rig scheduling.
Choose FLAC3D if
- You need 3d finite difference modeling.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want stress-strain analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is CorePlan or FLAC3D better?
- Neither clearly leads. CorePlan starts at $1350/month and FLAC3D at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CorePlan or FLAC3D?
- CorePlan starts at $1350/month and FLAC3D at On request.
- Does CorePlan or FLAC3D run on more platforms?
- CorePlan runs on Web, iOS, Android. FLAC3D runs on Windows, Linux.
- What is CorePlan best used for?
- CorePlan is most often used for a junior explorer running a two rig programme that wants cost per metre visible weekly instead of when the contractor invoice arrives, a drilling contractor with crews across several client sites submitting plods digitally to cut invoice disputes, an exploration manager reconciling contractor billing against recorded shift hours before approving payment, a multi project mid tier miner consolidating hole planning and sample dispatch across sites that currently each run their own spreadsheet. Of those, a junior explorer running a two rig programme that wants cost per metre visible weekly instead of when the contractor invoice arrives and a drilling contractor with crews across several client sites submitting plods digitally to cut invoice disputes are not what FLAC3D is typically brought in for.
- What can CorePlan do that FLAC3D cannot?
- CorePlan covers Digital plods, Rig scheduling, Contractor reconciliation, Sample and core tracking. FLAC3D covers 3D finite difference modeling, Stress-strain analysis, Dynamic analysis, Coupled flow analysis.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CorePlan: Is CorePlan a geological database?
No. It manages drilling operations, plods, scheduling and sample dispatch. Geological data still lives in acQuire, Datashed or similar.
FLAC3D: What licensing models does FLAC3D offer?
FLAC3D offers perpetual licenses (one-time purchase) and subscription licenses (recurring payments). Web-based license management allows central organizational control.
SourceCorePlan: Can drilling contractors use it too?
Yes, and that is the point. Contractors submit plods on the same platform their client uses, which removes the invoice reconciliation argument.
FLAC3D: Can I run multiple instances of FLAC3D with one license?
Yes. FLAC3D licenses allow two instances to run simultaneously on the same computer.
SourceCorePlan: What does it actually cost?
Starter is 1,350 US dollars a month for one project and two rigs, billed annually. Everything above that is quoted, and the analytics and field modules add several hundred dollars a month each.
FLAC3D: How do I get a free trial or demo of FLAC3D?
FLAC3D offers a free software demo download. Visitors can request the demo through the product page or contact the company directly.
SourceCorePlan: Does it work without mobile signal?
Yes, field capture works offline and syncs when the rig comes back into coverage.
FLAC3D: What is the pricing for FLAC3D?
Specific pricing is not listed on the product page. Users must request a quote through the 'REQUEST A QUOTE' button or purchase through the FastSpring payment processor.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- CorePlan vs Micromine
- CorePlan vs Imago
- CorePlan vs Deswik Suite
- CorePlan vs Wenco
- CorePlan vs Leapfrog Geo
- CorePlan vs Surpac
- CorePlan vs Geoscience ANALYST
- CorePlan vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- CorePlan vs Promine
- CorePlan vs acQuire GIM Suite
- CorePlan vs Caterpillar MineStar
- CorePlan vs Minemax
- CorePlan vs OptiMine
- CorePlan vs Vulcan
- CorePlan vs 3DEC
- CorePlan vs Seequent Central
- CorePlan vs GeoStudio
- CorePlan vs PLAXIS
- CorePlan vs Maptek I-Site
- CorePlan vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- CorePlan vs Datamine
- CorePlan vs RS2
- CorePlan vs Datamine Studio RM
- FLAC3D vs Micromine
- FLAC3D vs Imago
- FLAC3D vs Deswik Suite
- FLAC3D vs Wenco
- FLAC3D vs Leapfrog Geo
- FLAC3D vs Surpac
- FLAC3D vs Geoscience ANALYST
- FLAC3D vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- FLAC3D vs Promine
- FLAC3D vs acQuire GIM Suite
- FLAC3D vs Caterpillar MineStar
- FLAC3D vs Minemax
- FLAC3D vs OptiMine
- FLAC3D vs Vulcan
- FLAC3D vs 3DEC
- FLAC3D vs Seequent Central
- FLAC3D vs GeoStudio
- FLAC3D vs PLAXIS
- FLAC3D vs Maptek I-Site
- FLAC3D vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- FLAC3D vs Datamine
- FLAC3D vs RS2
- FLAC3D vs Datamine Studio RM
