Mining & Resources · head to head
FLAC3D vs Micromine
F
FLAC3D
Mining & Resources
3D finite difference software for geotechnical engineering
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Micromine
Mining & Resources
Exploration and mine design software solution
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FLAC3D the FLAC3D product page publishes no price and routes buyers to a quote request or an external software store; Micromine pricing is not published; sold by quote through a sales process
- They diverge on capability: FLAC3D covers 3D finite difference modeling, Micromine covers Data management.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FLAC3D and Micromine actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining & Resources).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FLAC3D
- 3D finite difference modeling
- Stress-strain analysis
- Dynamic analysis
- Coupled flow analysis
- Mining-specific features
- GeoStudio
- Python scripting
- Linux support
Only in Micromine
- Data management
- Geological modeling
- Resource estimation
- Mine design
- Scheduling
- Vulcan
- ArcGIS
- Excel
Both cover
- AutoCAD
- Leapfrog
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FLAC3D
- Three dimensional continuum modelling of soil and rock behaviournot Micromine
- Analysing underground excavation and mine stability including cavingnot Micromine
- Coupled thermal, dynamic and creep analysis of geotechnical structuresnot Micromine
Micromine
- Geological exploration and modellingnot FLAC3D
- Resource estimation and geostatisticsnot FLAC3D
- Mine design and surveyingnot FLAC3D
- Mine planning and schedulingnot FLAC3D
- Fleet management and mine operationsnot FLAC3D
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FLAC3D
- The FLAC3D product page publishes no price and routes buyers to a quote request or an external software store
- Advanced capabilities including Dynamics, Thermal, Creep and IMASS are optional modules sold separately from the base licence
- Licence portability depends on a physical USB key or a web licence managed centrally, rather than a simple sign in
- One licence permits only two simultaneous instances on the same computer
Micromine
- Pricing is not published; sold by quote through a sales process
Pricing, plan by plan
FLAC3D
On request- FLAC3D Professional$22000/year
- 3D finite difference analysis
- Slope stability
- Mine design
Micromine
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Micromine review.
Which should you pick?
Choose FLAC3D if
- You need 3d finite difference modeling.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want stress-strain analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is FLAC3D or Micromine better?
- Neither clearly leads. FLAC3D starts at On request and Micromine at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FLAC3D or Micromine?
- FLAC3D starts at On request and Micromine at On request.
- Does FLAC3D or Micromine run on more platforms?
- FLAC3D runs on Windows, Linux. Micromine runs on Web.
- What is FLAC3D best used for?
- FLAC3D is most often used for three dimensional continuum modelling of soil and rock behaviour, analysing underground excavation and mine stability including caving, coupled thermal, dynamic and creep analysis of geotechnical structures. Of those, three dimensional continuum modelling of soil and rock behaviour and analysing underground excavation and mine stability including caving are not what Micromine is typically brought in for.
- What can FLAC3D do that Micromine cannot?
- FLAC3D covers 3D finite difference modeling, Stress-strain analysis, Dynamic analysis, Coupled flow analysis. Micromine covers Data management, Geological modeling, Resource estimation, Mine design. Both handle AutoCAD, Leapfrog, Windows support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- FLAC3D vs Caterpillar MineStar
- FLAC3D vs Leapfrog Geo
- FLAC3D vs Deswik Suite
- FLAC3D vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- FLAC3D vs Datamine
- FLAC3D vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- FLAC3D vs Datamine Studio RM
- FLAC3D vs Maptek I-Site
- FLAC3D vs Minemax
- FLAC3D vs Promine
- FLAC3D vs Surpac
- FLAC3D vs Trimble Mining
- FLAC3D vs Vulcan
- FLAC3D vs 3DEC
- FLAC3D vs acQuire GIM Suite
- FLAC3D vs Carlson Mining
- FLAC3D vs Cority EHS
- FLAC3D vs Enablon EHS
- Micromine vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Micromine vs Leapfrog Geo
- Micromine vs Deswik Suite
- Micromine vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Micromine vs Datamine
- Micromine vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Micromine vs Datamine Studio RM
- Micromine vs Maptek I-Site
- Micromine vs Minemax
- Micromine vs Promine
- Micromine vs Surpac
- Micromine vs Trimble Mining
- Micromine vs Vulcan
- Micromine vs 3DEC
- Micromine vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Micromine vs Carlson Mining
- Micromine vs Cority EHS
- Micromine vs Enablon EHS
