Developer Tools · head to head
Fig vs Wiz
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Wiz
Cloud
Cloud and AI security platform unifying code, cloud, and runtime protection.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Fig has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete; Wiz no public pricing; licensing requires a custom quote based on workloads and sensors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fig and Wiz actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that Wiz does not also cover.
Only in Wiz
- Cloud security posture management
- Code security (Wiz Code)
- Runtime threat detection (Wiz Defend)
- AI security agents
- AI workload protection
- Attack path analysis
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Wiz
- Identifying cloud misconfigurations across multi-cloud environmentsnot Fig
- Securing code from IDE through CI/CD deploymentnot Fig
- Detecting and responding to active threats at runtimenot Fig
- Governing AI workloads and models in the cloudnot Fig
- Prioritizing risk with cross-environment attack path analysisnot Fig
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Wiz
- No public pricing; licensing requires a custom quote based on workloads and sensors.
- Modular licensing across Cloud, Code, Defend, and Sensor products can complicate cost planning.
- Full runtime protection value depends on deploying Wiz Sensor agents, adding operational overhead.
- Primarily aimed at mid-to-large enterprises despite the smaller Wiz Go bundle.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Wiz
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Wiz review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Wiz if
- You need cloud security posture management.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want code security (wiz code).
Questions people ask
- Is Fig or Wiz better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fig starts at Free and Wiz at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fig or Wiz?
- Fig has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Fig and On request for Wiz.
- Does Fig or Wiz run on more platforms?
- Fig runs on Web. Wiz runs on web, api.
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Yes. Fig has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wiz starts at On request.
- What can Fig do that Wiz cannot?
- Wiz covers Cloud security posture management, Code security (Wiz Code), Runtime threat detection (Wiz Defend), AI security agents.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Wiz: How much does Wiz cost?
Wiz does not publish standard pricing. The platform uses modular licensing based on workloads, active developers, log ingestion, or sensors. All pricing requires requesting a custom quote directly from the company.
SourceWiz: Does Wiz offer a free trial?
No free trial information is mentioned on Wiz's pricing page. Pricing is determined by custom quote based on organizational needs.
SourceWiz: What products does Wiz offer?
Wiz provides five modular licensing options: Wiz Cloud, Wiz Code, Wiz Defend, Wiz Sensor, and Wiz Go Bundle for SMBs, allowing organizations to scale based on specific security requirements.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Orca Security
- Fig vs Northflank
- Fig vs Akamai
- Fig vs Pulumi
- Fig vs Fly.io
- Fig vs Portworx
- Fig vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Fig vs Proxmox VE
- Fig vs Rancher
- Fig vs Azure Functions
- Fig vs Chef
- Fig vs Cilium
- Fig vs Zeabur
- Fig vs Zipkin
- Fig vs DeepInfra
- Fig vs Fireworks AI
- Fig vs Thanos
- Wiz vs Visual Studio Code
- Wiz vs ESLint
- Wiz vs Turborepo
- Wiz vs pnpm
- Wiz vs Sweep
- Wiz vs Cody
- Wiz vs Warp
- Wiz vs Keycloak
- Wiz vs Rust
- Wiz vs CodeSandbox
- Wiz vs Vite
- Wiz vs Daytona
- Wiz vs Visual Studio
- Wiz vs Xlinesoft
- Wiz vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Wiz vs Sourcegraph
- Wiz vs Orca Security
- Wiz vs Northflank
- Wiz vs Akamai
- Wiz vs Pulumi
- Wiz vs Fly.io
- Wiz vs Portworx
- Wiz vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Wiz vs Proxmox VE
- Wiz vs Rancher
- Wiz vs Azure Functions
- Wiz vs Chef
- Wiz vs Cilium
- Wiz vs Zeabur
- Wiz vs Zipkin
- Wiz vs DeepInfra
- Wiz vs Fireworks AI
- Wiz vs Thanos
