Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs Wiz

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Wiz
Cloud
Cloud and AI security platform unifying code, cloud, and runtime protection.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Keycloak has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; Wiz no public pricing; licensing requires a custom quote based on workloads and sensors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and Wiz actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Wiz does not also cover.
Only in Wiz
- Cloud security posture management
- Code security (Wiz Code)
- Runtime threat detection (Wiz Defend)
- AI security agents
- AI workload protection
- Attack path analysis
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Wiz
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Wiz
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Wiz
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Wiz
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Wiz
Wiz
- Identifying cloud misconfigurations across multi-cloud environmentsnot Keycloak
- Securing code from IDE through CI/CD deploymentnot Keycloak
- Detecting and responding to active threats at runtimenot Keycloak
- Governing AI workloads and models in the cloudnot Keycloak
- Prioritizing risk with cross-environment attack path analysisnot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Wiz
- No public pricing; licensing requires a custom quote based on workloads and sensors.
- Modular licensing across Cloud, Code, Defend, and Sensor products can complicate cost planning.
- Full runtime protection value depends on deploying Wiz Sensor agents, adding operational overhead.
- Primarily aimed at mid-to-large enterprises despite the smaller Wiz Go bundle.
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Wiz
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Wiz review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Choose Wiz if
- You need cloud security posture management.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want code security (wiz code).
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or Wiz better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and Wiz at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or Wiz?
- Keycloak has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Keycloak and On request for Wiz.
- Does Keycloak or Wiz run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. Wiz runs on web, api.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Yes. Keycloak has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wiz starts at On request.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what Wiz is typically brought in for.
- What can Keycloak do that Wiz cannot?
- Wiz covers Cloud security posture management, Code security (Wiz Code), Runtime threat detection (Wiz Defend), AI security agents.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceWiz: How much does Wiz cost?
Wiz does not publish standard pricing. The platform uses modular licensing based on workloads, active developers, log ingestion, or sensors. All pricing requires requesting a custom quote directly from the company.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceWiz: Does Wiz offer a free trial?
No free trial information is mentioned on Wiz's pricing page. Pricing is determined by custom quote based on organizational needs.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceWiz: What products does Wiz offer?
Wiz provides five modular licensing options: Wiz Cloud, Wiz Code, Wiz Defend, Wiz Sensor, and Wiz Go Bundle for SMBs, allowing organizations to scale based on specific security requirements.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Orca Security
- Keycloak vs Northflank
- Keycloak vs Akamai
- Keycloak vs Pulumi
- Keycloak vs Fly.io
- Keycloak vs Portworx
- Keycloak vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Keycloak vs Proxmox VE
- Keycloak vs Rancher
- Keycloak vs Azure Functions
- Keycloak vs Chef
- Keycloak vs Cilium
- Keycloak vs Zeabur
- Keycloak vs Zipkin
- Keycloak vs DeepInfra
- Keycloak vs Fireworks AI
- Keycloak vs Thanos
- Wiz vs Penpot
- Wiz vs Soketi
- Wiz vs Ansible
- Wiz vs Atlantis
- Wiz vs Vite
- Wiz vs Depot
- Wiz vs Pants Build
- Wiz vs Buildkite
- Wiz vs Coder
- Wiz vs Jitsu
- Wiz vs Bitbucket
- Wiz vs Sweep
- Wiz vs Azure DevOps
- Wiz vs Backstage
- Wiz vs Claude Code
- Wiz vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Wiz vs Cody
- Wiz vs Orca Security
- Wiz vs Northflank
- Wiz vs Akamai
- Wiz vs Pulumi
- Wiz vs Fly.io
- Wiz vs Portworx
- Wiz vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Wiz vs Proxmox VE
- Wiz vs Rancher
- Wiz vs Azure Functions
- Wiz vs Chef
- Wiz vs Cilium
- Wiz vs Zeabur
- Wiz vs Zipkin
- Wiz vs DeepInfra
- Wiz vs Fireworks AI
- Wiz vs Thanos
