Developer Tools · head to head
Fig vs WireGuard
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

WireGuard
Cybersecurity
Modern, minimal-complexity VPN protocol with state-of-the-art cryptography
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete; WireGuard manual key management required; WireGuard does not provide automated peer discovery or key distribution mechanisms
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fig and WireGuard actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
WireGuard
- Site-to-site VPN connectivity for datacentres and branch officesnot Fig
- High-performance VPN applications requiring minimal latency and CPU overheadnot Fig
- Embedded systems and IoT devices with strict memory and storage constraintsnot Fig
- WireGuard-based managed services (Tailscale, Mullvad VPN) providing abstraction over raw protocolnot Fig
- Kernel module for Linux-based VPN appliances and firewallsnot Fig
- Research and development in cryptographic protocol designnot Fig
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
WireGuard
- Manual key management required; WireGuard does not provide automated peer discovery or key distribution mechanisms
- No built-in support for address allocation or DHCP; all IP assignments must be manually configured
- Limited to UDP; TCP encapsulation requires wrapper tools, making it unsuitable for environments blocking UDP
- Stateless protocol design means lost packets trigger peer disconnection rather than transparent reconnection
- Requires operational expertise to securely configure and deploy; not suitable for non-technical users without wrapper tools (Tailscale, Mullvad)
Pricing, plan by plan
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
WireGuard
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the WireGuard review.
Which should you pick?
Choose WireGuard if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, FreeBSD, OpenBSD.
Questions people ask
- Is Fig or WireGuard better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fig starts at Free and WireGuard at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fig or WireGuard?
- Fig starts at Free and WireGuard at Free.
- Does Fig or WireGuard run on more platforms?
- Fig runs on Web. WireGuard runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, FreeBSD, OpenBSD.
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
WireGuard: Is WireGuard free?
Yes, WireGuard is free and open-source software. The Linux kernel module is licensed under GPLv2; implementations for other platforms use MIT or Apache 2.0 licences. There are no licensing fees.
SourceWireGuard: How does WireGuard differ from IPsec and OpenVPN?
WireGuard replaces complex negotiation protocols and state machines with simple public-key cryptography. Its code is roughly 100 times smaller than IPsec, making it faster to audit, deploy, and maintain. It uses modern cryptographic primitives rather than legacy algorithms.
SourceWireGuard: Can I use WireGuard for a commercial VPN service?
Yes. Several commercial VPN services (Mullvad, IVPN, ProtonVPN) use WireGuard as their underlying protocol. You must implement peer management, key distribution, and endpoint selection on top of the WireGuard protocol.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Fig vs 1Password
- Fig vs Norton 360
- Fig vs LastPass
- Fig vs Falco
- Fig vs Chainguard
- Fig vs Jamf Pro
- Fig vs SonicWall
- Fig vs Snyk
- Fig vs Bitwarden
- Fig vs Brave Browser
- Fig vs Infisical
- Fig vs DTiQ
- Fig vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Fig vs ExpressVPN
- Fig vs Fenergo
- Fig vs Google Authenticator
- WireGuard vs Visual Studio Code
- WireGuard vs ESLint
- WireGuard vs Turborepo
- WireGuard vs pnpm
- WireGuard vs Sweep
- WireGuard vs Cody
- WireGuard vs Warp
- WireGuard vs Keycloak
- WireGuard vs Rust
- WireGuard vs CodeSandbox
- WireGuard vs Vite
- WireGuard vs Daytona
- WireGuard vs Visual Studio
- WireGuard vs Xlinesoft
- WireGuard vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- WireGuard vs Sourcegraph
- WireGuard vs Bitdefender Total Security
- WireGuard vs 1Password
- WireGuard vs Norton 360
- WireGuard vs LastPass
- WireGuard vs Falco
- WireGuard vs Chainguard
- WireGuard vs Jamf Pro
- WireGuard vs SonicWall
- WireGuard vs Snyk
- WireGuard vs Bitwarden
- WireGuard vs Brave Browser
- WireGuard vs Infisical
- WireGuard vs DTiQ
- WireGuard vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- WireGuard vs ExpressVPN
- WireGuard vs Fenergo
- WireGuard vs Google Authenticator
