Developer Tools · head to head
Fig vs Veracode
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
Veracode
Cybersecurity
Application risk management platform for finding and fixing software vulnerabilities.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Fig has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete; Veracode no public pricing; customers must request a demo and custom quote.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fig and Veracode actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that Veracode does not also cover.
Only in Veracode
- Static analysis (SAST)
- Dynamic analysis (DAST)
- Software composition analysis
- AI-driven code remediation
- Container security
- Risk Manager (ASPM)
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Veracode
- Scanning applications for vulnerabilities across the SDLCnot Fig
- Automating remediation of flagged security flaws with AInot Fig
- Securing containerized workloads before deploymentnot Fig
- Running penetration tests as a managed servicenot Fig
- Enforcing security policy governance across many applicationsnot Fig
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Veracode
- No public pricing; customers must request a demo and custom quote.
- Full platform capability spans many modules, which can require significant onboarding.
- Package Firewall and PTaaS are separate add-ons rather than included by default.
- Primarily built for enterprise scale, less suited to small individual projects.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Veracode
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Veracode review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Veracode if
- You need static analysis (sast).
- You work on web, api.
- You also want dynamic analysis (dast).
Questions people ask
- Is Fig or Veracode better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fig starts at Free and Veracode at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fig or Veracode?
- Fig has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Fig and On request for Veracode.
- Does Fig or Veracode run on more platforms?
- Fig runs on Web. Veracode runs on web, api.
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Yes. Fig has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Veracode starts at On request.
- What can Fig do that Veracode cannot?
- Veracode covers Static analysis (SAST), Dynamic analysis (DAST), Software composition analysis, AI-driven code remediation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Veracode: How does Veracode pricing work?
Veracode does not publish pricing on their website. Organizations must request a personalized demo or contact sales to receive quotes tailored to their specific needs and usage volume.
SourceVeracode: Does Veracode offer a free trial or free version?
No information about free trials or free versions is provided on Veracode's public website. Organizations must contact sales to discuss trial options.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Semgrep
- Fig vs Legit Security
- Fig vs Aikido
- Fig vs Snyk
- Fig vs Endor Labs
- Fig vs Tenable
- Fig vs Acunetix
- Fig vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Fig vs Recorded Future
- Fig vs Tanium
- Fig vs Trivy
- Fig vs Grype
- Fig vs Quantexa
- Fig vs Termly
- Fig vs Transcend
- Fig vs WireGuard
- Fig vs Akeyless
- Fig vs DataGrail
- Veracode vs Visual Studio Code
- Veracode vs ESLint
- Veracode vs Turborepo
- Veracode vs pnpm
- Veracode vs Sweep
- Veracode vs Cody
- Veracode vs Warp
- Veracode vs Keycloak
- Veracode vs Rust
- Veracode vs CodeSandbox
- Veracode vs Vite
- Veracode vs Daytona
- Veracode vs Visual Studio
- Veracode vs Xlinesoft
- Veracode vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Veracode vs Sourcegraph
- Veracode vs Semgrep
- Veracode vs Legit Security
- Veracode vs Aikido
- Veracode vs Snyk
- Veracode vs Endor Labs
- Veracode vs Tenable
- Veracode vs Acunetix
- Veracode vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Veracode vs Recorded Future
- Veracode vs Tanium
- Veracode vs Trivy
- Veracode vs Grype
- Veracode vs Quantexa
- Veracode vs Termly
- Veracode vs Transcend
- Veracode vs WireGuard
- Veracode vs Akeyless
- Veracode vs DataGrail