Cybersecurity · head to head
DataGrail vs Fig
DataGrail
Cybersecurity
Privacy platform that finds shadow data systems and automates data subject requests across them
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
F
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Fig has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: DataGrail no pricing is published, and while benchmarking suggests it undercuts OneTrust for comparable scope, cost still scales with request volume and connected systems, which grow with the business.; Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DataGrail and Fig actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DataGrail
- Live data discovery
- Request automation
- Audit trail
- Consent management
- Integration catalogue
- Risk monitoring
- Consumer request portal
- Reporting
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that DataGrail does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DataGrail
- A consumer brand whose deletion requests keep missing data in marketing tools the privacy team did not know existednot Fig
- A company processing hundreds of CCPA requests a month where manual fulfilment has become a full-time jobnot Fig
- A privacy team leaving OneTrust because the platform tracked requests but staff still completed them by handnot Fig
- An organisation needing evidence for a regulator that deletion actually occurred in every system, not that a ticket was closednot Fig
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DataGrail
- No pricing is published, and while benchmarking suggests it undercuts OneTrust for comparable scope, cost still scales with request volume and connected systems, which grow with the business.
- Automated fulfilment only works for systems with a supported connector, so homegrown applications and legacy databases still need manual handling, and those are usually where the awkward data lives.
- Discovery works by observing integrations and traffic patterns, so genuinely isolated systems, offline data and files on employee machines remain invisible and outside the data map.
- It is narrower than the enterprise privacy suites, lacking the assessment, third-party risk and wider GRC modules a large regulated organisation will also need, so it may be one of two platforms rather than the only one.
- Deletion automation is irreversible and mistakes are unrecoverable, so teams need real confidence in identity verification before enabling it, and that caution often keeps deletion semi-manual for months after purchase.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Pricing, plan by plan
DataGrail
On request- DataGrail Platform$undefined/year
- Data discovery and mapping
- Data subject request automation
- Consent management
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Which should you pick?
Choose DataGrail if
- You need live data discovery.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want request automation.
Questions people ask
- Is DataGrail or Fig better?
- Neither clearly leads. DataGrail starts at On request and Fig at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DataGrail or Fig?
- Fig has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for DataGrail and Free for Fig.
- Does DataGrail or Fig run on more platforms?
- DataGrail runs on Web, API. Fig runs on Web.
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Yes. Fig has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. DataGrail starts at On request.
- What is DataGrail best used for?
- DataGrail is most often used for a consumer brand whose deletion requests keep missing data in marketing tools the privacy team did not know existed, a company processing hundreds of ccpa requests a month where manual fulfilment has become a full-time job, a privacy team leaving onetrust because the platform tracked requests but staff still completed them by hand, an organisation needing evidence for a regulator that deletion actually occurred in every system, not that a ticket was closed. Of those, a consumer brand whose deletion requests keep missing data in marketing tools the privacy team did not know existed and a company processing hundreds of ccpa requests a month where manual fulfilment has become a full-time job are not what Fig is typically brought in for.
- What can DataGrail do that Fig cannot?
- DataGrail covers Live data discovery, Request automation, Audit trail, Consent management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DataGrail: How is DataGrail different from OneTrust?
OneTrust orchestrates the workflow; DataGrail focuses on connecting to systems and completing the request, and benchmark data suggests it prices materially below OneTrust for comparable scope.
DataGrail: Does it find systems we do not know about?
Yes. Continuous discovery of unsanctioned tools processing personal data is its main technical claim.
DataGrail: What does it cost?
Not published. Pricing is quoted by request volume and connected systems, with multi-year commitments typically discounted.
DataGrail: Does it cover consent as well as requests?
Yes, it includes consent management, though publishers needing certified advertising consent usually use a specialist CMP.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- DataGrail vs OneTrust
- DataGrail vs Transcend
- DataGrail vs TrustArc
- DataGrail vs Osano
- DataGrail vs BigID
- DataGrail vs Securiti
- DataGrail vs Termly
- DataGrail vs Mullvad VPN
- DataGrail vs Avast One
- DataGrail vs CyberGhost VPN
- DataGrail vs IVPN
- DataGrail vs ProtonVPN
- DataGrail vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- DataGrail vs Netwrix
- DataGrail vs NordVPN
- DataGrail vs Omada Identity
- DataGrail vs Ory
- DataGrail vs Microsoft Intune
- DataGrail vs Visual Studio Code
- DataGrail vs ESLint
- DataGrail vs Turborepo
- DataGrail vs pnpm
- DataGrail vs Sweep
- DataGrail vs Cody
- DataGrail vs Warp
- DataGrail vs Keycloak
- DataGrail vs Rust
- DataGrail vs CodeSandbox
- DataGrail vs Vite
- DataGrail vs Daytona
- DataGrail vs Visual Studio
- DataGrail vs Xlinesoft
- DataGrail vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- DataGrail vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs OneTrust
- Fig vs Transcend
- Fig vs TrustArc
- Fig vs Osano
- Fig vs BigID
- Fig vs Securiti
- Fig vs Termly
- Fig vs Mullvad VPN
- Fig vs Avast One
- Fig vs CyberGhost VPN
- Fig vs IVPN
- Fig vs ProtonVPN
- Fig vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Fig vs Netwrix
- Fig vs NordVPN
- Fig vs Omada Identity
- Fig vs Ory
- Fig vs Microsoft Intune
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph