Developer Tools · head to head
Fig vs Shortcut
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete; Shortcut limited reporting compared to Jira
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fig and Shortcut actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that Shortcut does not also cover.
Only in Shortcut
- Stories & epics
- Iterations (sprints)
- Kanban boards
- Roadmaps
- Reporting
- Docs
- API & webhooks
- Mobile apps
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Shortcut
- Sprint planningnot Fig
- Bug trackingnot Fig
- Feature developmentnot Fig
- Product roadmappingnot Fig
- Team collaborationnot Fig
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Shortcut
- Limited reporting compared to Jira
- Designed specifically for software teams, not general project management
- Can experience slow loading times with very large projects
Pricing, plan by plan
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Shortcut
Free- FreeFree
- Kanban boards
- Sprints
- Roadmaps
- Team$8.5/user/month
- Unlimited users
- Advanced reports
- WIP limits
- Business$12/user/month
- Unlimited workspaces
- OKRs
- Advanced custom fields
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Volume discounts
- SSO/SCIM
- Premier support
Which should you pick?
Choose Shortcut if
- You need stories & epics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux.
- You also want iterations (sprints).
Questions people ask
- Is Fig or Shortcut better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fig starts at Free and Shortcut at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fig or Shortcut?
- Fig starts at Free and Shortcut at Free.
- Does Fig or Shortcut run on more platforms?
- Fig runs on Web. Shortcut runs on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux.
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What can Fig do that Shortcut cannot?
- Shortcut covers Stories & epics, Iterations (sprints), Kanban boards, Roadmaps.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Shortcut: Does Shortcut have a free plan?
Yes, Shortcut offers a free plan for up to 10 users with core features like kanban boards, roadmaps, sprints, and reports. Paid plans start at $8.50 per user per month.
SourceShortcut: Does Shortcut integrate with GitHub?
Yes, Shortcut has native GitHub integration that automatically syncs pull requests and commits to stories, and includes GitLab and Bitbucket support as well.
SourceShortcut: Can I use Shortcut for non-technical projects?
Shortcut is built for software teams, though you can customize workflows for other use cases. Linear and Asana may be better suited for non-technical project management.
SourceShortcut: Does Shortcut support SSO and SCIM?
Yes, SSO and SCIM support are available on the Enterprise plan, allowing centralized identity management for large organizations.
SourceShortcut: What's the difference between Shortcut and Jira?
Shortcut is lighter and faster with less setup required, while Jira offers deeper customization and enterprise features. Shortcut works better for modern software teams wanting simplicity; Jira suits enterprises needing extensive configuration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Jira
- Fig vs Asana
- Fig vs Linear
- Fig vs Height
- Fig vs Monday.com
- Fig vs ClickUp
- Fig vs Notion
- Fig vs Plane
- Fig vs GitHub
- Fig vs Lucidchart
- Fig vs Figma
- Fig vs Coda
- Fig vs Neovim
- Fig vs RescueTime
- Fig vs UptimeRobot
- Fig vs Vercel
- Fig vs Zeta
- Fig vs CloudAMQP
- Shortcut vs Visual Studio Code
- Shortcut vs ESLint
- Shortcut vs Turborepo
- Shortcut vs pnpm
- Shortcut vs Sweep
- Shortcut vs Cody
- Shortcut vs Warp
- Shortcut vs Keycloak
- Shortcut vs Rust
- Shortcut vs CodeSandbox
- Shortcut vs Vite
- Shortcut vs Daytona
- Shortcut vs Visual Studio
- Shortcut vs Xlinesoft
- Shortcut vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Shortcut vs Sourcegraph
- Shortcut vs Jira
- Shortcut vs Asana
- Shortcut vs Linear
- Shortcut vs Height
- Shortcut vs Monday.com
- Shortcut vs ClickUp
- Shortcut vs Notion
- Shortcut vs Plane
- Shortcut vs GitHub
- Shortcut vs Lucidchart
- Shortcut vs Figma
- Shortcut vs Coda
- Shortcut vs Neovim
- Shortcut vs RescueTime
- Shortcut vs UptimeRobot
- Shortcut vs Vercel
- Shortcut vs Zeta
- Shortcut vs CloudAMQP

