Cybersecurity · head to head
Fenergo vs Recorded Future

Fenergo
Cybersecurity
Client lifecycle management and KYC onboarding for regulated financial institutions
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Recorded Future
Cybersecurity
Intelligence-driven cybersecurity
- From
- $25000/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fenergo implementations commonly run twelve to twenty-four months and depend on a systems integrator, so the services cost frequently exceeds the software subscription in year one.; Recorded Future no pricing published; all three tiers (Core, Professional, Elite) require sales contact for quotes
- They diverge on capability: Fenergo covers Regulatory rules library, Recorded Future covers Real-time threat intelligence.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fenergo and Recorded Future actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fenergo | Recorded Future |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $25000/year |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Api, Cloud |
| Founded | Unknown | 2009 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fenergo
- Regulatory rules library
- Digital onboarding
- Perpetual KYC
- Entity data model
- Screening orchestration
- Case management
Only in Recorded Future
- Real-time threat intelligence
- Vulnerability intelligence
- Internet-wide data analysis
- Insikt group intelligence
- Brand intelligence
- API-first platform
- Alert and notification system
- Custom reporting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fenergo
- A bank operating in twenty jurisdictions that cannot keep local KYC requirements current across separate regional teamsnot Recorded Future
- A custodian moving from calendar-based periodic review to event-driven perpetual KYC to cut analyst headcountnot Recorded Future
- An asset manager onboarding funds and trusts where the ownership hierarchy defeats generic identity verification toolsnot Recorded Future
- A payments institution facing a regulatory remediation order and needing a defensible audit trail of every client reviewnot Recorded Future
Recorded Future
- Threat intelligence and monitoringnot Fenergo
- Dark web monitoring and brand protectionnot Fenergo
- Third-party risk managementnot Fenergo
- Security operations and incident responsenot Fenergo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fenergo
- Implementations commonly run twelve to twenty-four months and depend on a systems integrator, so the services cost frequently exceeds the software subscription in year one.
- It orchestrates screening but does not supply the sanctions, PEP or adverse media data, so you still buy Dow Jones, LexisNexis or World-Check separately and those fees are per screened entity.
- The entry price is set for institutions with large onboarding volumes, which puts it out of reach of smaller banks and fintechs that would otherwise benefit from the rules library.
- Configuration is deep and specific, which makes upgrades between major versions a project rather than a patch, and some customers stay on old releases for years.
- The rules library covers regulatory requirements, not your internal risk appetite, so the policy tuning that determines whether onboarding actually gets faster remains your work.
Recorded Future
- No pricing published; all three tiers (Core, Professional, Elite) require sales contact for quotes
- Pricing depends on organization size, usage levels, and services in addition to tier selection
- API usage limits vary by package but limits not specified on pricing page
Pricing, plan by plan
Fenergo
On request- Fenergo Client Lifecycle Management$undefined/year
- Priced by institution size, jurisdictions in scope and modules licensed
- Regulatory rules content subscription bundled into the annual fee
- Implementation delivered by Fenergo or a systems integrator and quoted separately
Recorded Future
$25000/year- Threat Intelligence$25000/year
- Threat feeds
- IP reputation
- Domain analysis
- Vulnerability Intelligence$35000/year
- CVE monitoring
- Patch intelligence
- Vulnerability trending
- Complete Intelligence$50000/year
- All features
- Analyst access
- Dedicated feed
Which should you pick?
Choose Recorded Future if
- You need real-time threat intelligence.
- You work on Web, Api, Cloud.
- You also want vulnerability intelligence.
Questions people ask
- Is Fenergo or Recorded Future better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fenergo starts at On request and Recorded Future at $25000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fenergo or Recorded Future?
- Fenergo starts at On request and Recorded Future at $25000/year.
- Does Fenergo or Recorded Future run on more platforms?
- Fenergo runs on Web. Recorded Future runs on Web, Api, Cloud.
- What is Fenergo best used for?
- Fenergo is most often used for a bank operating in twenty jurisdictions that cannot keep local kyc requirements current across separate regional teams, a custodian moving from calendar-based periodic review to event-driven perpetual kyc to cut analyst headcount, an asset manager onboarding funds and trusts where the ownership hierarchy defeats generic identity verification tools, a payments institution facing a regulatory remediation order and needing a defensible audit trail of every client review. Of those, a bank operating in twenty jurisdictions that cannot keep local kyc requirements current across separate regional teams and a custodian moving from calendar-based periodic review to event-driven perpetual kyc to cut analyst headcount are not what Recorded Future is typically brought in for.
- What can Fenergo do that Recorded Future cannot?
- Fenergo covers Regulatory rules library, Digital onboarding, Perpetual KYC, Entity data model. Recorded Future covers Real-time threat intelligence, Vulnerability intelligence, Internet-wide data analysis, Insikt group intelligence.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fenergo: Does Fenergo do the sanctions screening itself?
No. It orchestrates calls to third-party data providers such as Dow Jones and World-Check, and those subscriptions are additional and usually charged per screened entity.
Recorded Future: What are the main pricing tiers offered by Recorded Future?
Recorded Future offers three tiers: Core (foundational intelligence), Professional (marked most-popular with automation and autonomous threat hunts), and Elite (comprehensive coverage including third-party risk assessment). Specific pricing requires contacting sales.
SourceFenergo: Is it SaaS or on-premises?
Both. The SaaS offering runs on Microsoft Azure with regional deployment options, which matters where data residency rules prohibit client data leaving the jurisdiction.
Recorded Future: What is included in Recorded Future's Core pricing tier?
Core tier includes cyber operations monitoring with threat and malware insights, digital risk protection covering dark web monitoring and credential detection, and the new digital risk hub. Exact cost depends on organization size and usage.
SourceFenergo: How long does a deployment take?
Plan for a year at minimum for a multi-jurisdiction rollout. Single-jurisdiction deployments with a narrow product set can be shorter but rarely under six months.
Recorded Future: What features does Recorded Future Professional tier add?
Professional tier adds autonomous threat hunts, continuous threat monitoring, automated threat preventions, external intelligence ingestion, and external asset discovery. Pricing is custom-quoted based on organization size and services.
SourceRecorded Future: How does Recorded Future handle user limits and API access?
Recorded Future does not limit the number of platform users or integrations across any tier. API usage limits vary by package tier but exact limits are not specified on the public pricing page.
SourceRelated pages
More on Recorded Future
Other head to heads
- Fenergo vs Veriff
- Fenergo vs Trulioo
- Fenergo vs NICE Actimize
- Fenergo vs Jumio
- Fenergo vs Quantexa
- Fenergo vs iDenfy
- Fenergo vs Sumsub
- Fenergo vs Shufti Pro
- Fenergo vs ThetaRay
- Fenergo vs IDnow
- Fenergo vs Feedzai
- Fenergo vs Unit21
- Fenergo vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Fenergo vs Passbolt
- Fenergo vs Ping Identity
- Fenergo vs Proofpoint
- Fenergo vs Qualys VMDR
- Fenergo vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Fenergo vs Norton 360
- Fenergo vs 1Password
- Fenergo vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Fenergo vs LastPass
- Fenergo vs IBM QRadar
- Fenergo vs Tenable
- Fenergo vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Fenergo vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Fenergo vs Darktrace
- Fenergo vs NordVPN
- Fenergo vs Omada Identity
- Fenergo vs Ory
- Fenergo vs ProtonVPN
- Fenergo vs Resolver
- Fenergo vs Saviynt
- Recorded Future vs Veriff
- Recorded Future vs Trulioo
- Recorded Future vs NICE Actimize
- Recorded Future vs Jumio
- Recorded Future vs Quantexa
- Recorded Future vs iDenfy
- Recorded Future vs Sumsub
- Recorded Future vs Shufti Pro
- Recorded Future vs ThetaRay
- Recorded Future vs IDnow
- Recorded Future vs Feedzai
- Recorded Future vs Unit21
- Recorded Future vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Recorded Future vs Passbolt
- Recorded Future vs Ping Identity
- Recorded Future vs Proofpoint
- Recorded Future vs Qualys VMDR
- Recorded Future vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Recorded Future vs Norton 360
- Recorded Future vs 1Password
- Recorded Future vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Recorded Future vs LastPass
- Recorded Future vs IBM QRadar
- Recorded Future vs Tenable
- Recorded Future vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Recorded Future vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Recorded Future vs Darktrace
- Recorded Future vs NordVPN
- Recorded Future vs Omada Identity
- Recorded Future vs Ory
- Recorded Future vs ProtonVPN
- Recorded Future vs Resolver
- Recorded Future vs Saviynt
