Cybersecurity · head to head
Entrust Identity as a Service vs Feedzai

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Rated
- -

Feedzai
Cybersecurity
Real-time transaction fraud and financial crime detection for banks and payment processors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.; Feedzai pricing is per transaction with an annual minimum, so a bank with seasonal or growing volume commits to a floor it may not use and pays overage above the band.
- They diverge on capability: Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Feedzai covers Real-time scoring.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Entrust Identity as a Service and Feedzai actually diverge.
| Attribute | Entrust Identity as a Service | Feedzai |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2/month | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | quote |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux | Web, Linux |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
Only in Feedzai
- Real-time scoring
- Rule and model hybrid
- Case manager
- Behavioural biometrics
- Model explainability
- Deployment options
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot Feedzai
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot Feedzai
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot Feedzai
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot Feedzai
Feedzai
- A bank joining an instant payments scheme where transfers are irrevocable and post-hoc recovery is impossiblenot Entrust Identity as a Service
- A card issuer whose existing rules engine cannot be changed without a release, so fraud waves run for daysnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- An acquirer needing per-merchant risk models rather than one portfolio-wide modelnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- A bank required by its regulator to explain automated declines to customers, which rules out opaque scoringnot Entrust Identity as a Service
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
Feedzai
- Pricing is per transaction with an annual minimum, so a bank with seasonal or growing volume commits to a floor it may not use and pays overage above the band.
- It sits in the authorisation path, which makes every upgrade a change-controlled event with rollback plans, and the operational burden falls on the bank rather than the vendor.
- Out of the box models need months of the customer own labelled fraud history before they beat the rules they replace, so the value case starts late.
- AML and fraud are licensed as separate modules, so institutions expecting one platform fee find the transaction monitoring capability is a second line item.
- The buyer profile is large institutions, so smaller banks and fintechs face minimums that make per-transaction economics unattractive below significant scale.
Pricing, plan by plan
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
Feedzai
On request- Feedzai Financial Crime Platform$undefined/year
- Priced by transaction volume with annual minimum commitment
- Modules for fraud, AML and account opening licensed separately
- Cloud, private cloud and on-premises deployment
Which should you pick?
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Choose Feedzai if
- You need real-time scoring.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want rule and model hybrid.
Questions people ask
- Is Entrust Identity as a Service or Feedzai better?
- Neither clearly leads. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and Feedzai at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Entrust Identity as a Service or Feedzai?
- Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and Feedzai at On request.
- Does Entrust Identity as a Service or Feedzai run on more platforms?
- Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux. Feedzai runs on Web, Linux.
- What is Entrust Identity as a Service best used for?
- Entrust Identity as a Service is most often used for a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate, a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff, an organisation already buying entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendor, a defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorly. Of those, a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate and a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff are not what Feedzai is typically brought in for.
- What can Entrust Identity as a Service do that Feedzai cannot?
- Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login. Feedzai covers Real-time scoring, Rule and model hybrid, Case manager, Behavioural biometrics.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Entrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
Feedzai: Can Feedzai run on-premises?
Yes. On-premises and private cloud deployments are supported, which is why it appears in markets where transaction data cannot legally leave the country.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
Feedzai: Does it cover AML as well as fraud?
It does, but transaction monitoring is a separately licensed module. Assume two line items if you want both.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
Feedzai: How fast are decisions?
Designed for the authorisation window, typically tens of milliseconds. This is the constraint that rules out batch scoring architectures.
Related pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
Other head to heads
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Unit21
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ThetaRay
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs NICE Actimize
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Quantexa
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Sardine
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Silent Eight
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Socure
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Sumsub
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs iDenfy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs BeyondTrust
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Bitdefender VPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Burp Suite
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Check Point Software
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Darktrace
- Feedzai vs Cisco Duo
- Feedzai vs JumpCloud
- Feedzai vs Ping Identity
- Feedzai vs Frontegg
- Feedzai vs Authelia
- Feedzai vs Beyond Identity
- Feedzai vs Transmit Security
- Feedzai vs Akeyless
- Feedzai vs authentik
- Feedzai vs Logto
- Feedzai vs Speakeasy
- Feedzai vs Authy
- Feedzai vs ExpressVPN
- Feedzai vs Falco
- Feedzai vs Fenergo
- Feedzai vs Google Authenticator
- Feedzai vs Grype
- Feedzai vs Hanwha Vision
- Feedzai vs Unit21
- Feedzai vs ThetaRay
- Feedzai vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Feedzai vs NICE Actimize
- Feedzai vs Quantexa
- Feedzai vs Sardine
- Feedzai vs Silent Eight
- Feedzai vs Socure
- Feedzai vs Sumsub
- Feedzai vs iDenfy
- Feedzai vs BeyondTrust
- Feedzai vs Bitdefender VPN
- Feedzai vs Burp Suite
- Feedzai vs Check Point Software
- Feedzai vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Feedzai vs Darktrace
