Libraries · head to head
Evergreen ILS vs Rollup
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Evergreen ILS server installation is supported only on Debian 10, 11, 12 and 13 and Ubuntu 22.04 and 24.04; Rollup slower than the Go and Rust bundlers that followed it, since it is written in JavaScript
- They diverge on capability: Evergreen ILS covers Circulation management, Rollup covers Tree shaking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Evergreen ILS and Rollup actually diverge.
| Attribute | Evergreen ILS | Rollup |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Web, Desktop, Api | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Category | Libraries | Web Development |
| Founded | 2006 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Evergreen ILS
- Circulation management
- MARC cataloging
- Acquisitions
- Serials management
- OPAC with faceted search
- Patron management
- Offline circulation
- Consortia support
Only in Rollup
- Tree shaking
- Clean output
- Multiple output formats
- Plugin API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Evergreen ILS
- Running a consortium-scale library catalogue and circulation systemnot Rollup
- Self-hosting an open source integrated library system across multiple branchesnot Rollup
Rollup
- Publishing a JavaScript library in several module formatsnot Evergreen ILS
- Builds where output size and cleanliness matter more than build speednot Evergreen ILS
- Producing ES module output for consumers who will bundle it themselvesnot Evergreen ILS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Evergreen ILS
- Server installation is supported only on Debian 10, 11, 12 and 13 and Ubuntu 22.04 and 24.04
- PostgreSQL 14 is the minimum supported version
- OpenSRF 3.3.0 or later must be installed separately before Evergreen itself
- Installation is a manual multi-service process requiring a dedicated PostgreSQL superuser account and shell access
Rollup
- Slower than the Go and Rust bundlers that followed it, since it is written in JavaScript
- Application concerns like dev servers and hot reloading are not its job, so app builds need Vite on top
- Configuration for non-trivial applications gets verbose compared with tools that assume more
Pricing, plan by plan
Evergreen ILS
Free- Self-HostedFree
- Full ILS functionality
- Circulation system
- OPAC
- Hosted (via partners)$200/month
- Everything in Self-Hosted
- Managed hosting
- Professional support
Rollup
Free- RollupFree
- Full functionality
- Commercial use permitted
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Evergreen ILS if
- You need circulation management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Api.
- You also want marc cataloging.
Choose Rollup if
- You need tree shaking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want clean output.
Questions people ask
- Is Evergreen ILS or Rollup better?
- Neither clearly leads. Evergreen ILS starts at Free and Rollup at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Evergreen ILS or Rollup?
- Evergreen ILS starts at Free and Rollup at Free.
- Does Evergreen ILS or Rollup run on more platforms?
- Evergreen ILS runs on Web, Desktop, Api. Rollup runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Evergreen ILS for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Evergreen ILS best used for?
- Evergreen ILS is most often used for running a consortium-scale library catalogue and circulation system, self-hosting an open source integrated library system across multiple branches. Of those, running a consortium-scale library catalogue and circulation system and self-hosting an open source integrated library system across multiple branches are not what Rollup is typically brought in for.
- What can Evergreen ILS do that Rollup cannot?
- Evergreen ILS covers Circulation management, MARC cataloging, Acquisitions, Serials management. Rollup covers Tree shaking, Clean output, Multiple output formats, Plugin API.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Evergreen ILS: Is Evergreen ILS free?
Yes, Evergreen ILS is a free open source library management system. The software is available at no cost for libraries and organizations to install, deploy, and customize according to their needs.
SourceRollup: Is Rollup free?
Yes, open source under the MIT licence.
Evergreen ILS: Does Evergreen ILS offer commercial support or hosting?
Evergreen ILS website does not list commercial hosting or support services. As an open source project, it relies on community contributions and institutional deployments. Libraries may arrange custom support through integrators or consultants, but no official commercial offerings are detailed on the website.
SourceRollup: Rollup or webpack?
Rollup is the usual choice for libraries thanks to cleaner output and better tree shaking. webpack remains stronger for complex applications with heavy asset handling.
Rollup: Do I need Rollup if I use Vite?
Not directly. Vite uses Rollup for production builds, so you already benefit from it.
Related pages
More on Evergreen ILS
Other head to heads
- Evergreen ILS vs VuFind
- Evergreen ILS vs ArchivesSpace
- Evergreen ILS vs CONTENTdm
- Evergreen ILS vs Omeka
- Evergreen ILS vs DSpace
- Evergreen ILS vs Koha
- Evergreen ILS vs SirsiDynix Symphony
- Evergreen ILS vs CollectiveAccess
- Evergreen ILS vs Ant Design
- Evergreen ILS vs Libby
- Evergreen ILS vs Hoopla
- Evergreen ILS vs Vuetify
- Evergreen ILS vs Axiell Collections
- Evergreen ILS vs Base UI
- Evergreen ILS vs daisyUI
- Evergreen ILS vs Ex Libris Alma
- Evergreen ILS vs OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- Evergreen ILS vs esbuild
- Evergreen ILS vs Turbopack
- Evergreen ILS vs MySQL
- Evergreen ILS vs Docusaurus
- Evergreen ILS vs MUI
- Evergreen ILS vs Bootstrap
- Evergreen ILS vs Radix UI
- Evergreen ILS vs shadcn/ui
- Evergreen ILS vs Chakra UI
- Evergreen ILS vs Apache HTTP Server
- Evergreen ILS vs Drupal
- Evergreen ILS vs Lit
- Evergreen ILS vs .NET
- Evergreen ILS vs Express.js
- Evergreen ILS vs FastAPI
- Evergreen ILS vs NestJS
- Rollup vs VuFind
- Rollup vs ArchivesSpace
- Rollup vs CONTENTdm
- Rollup vs Omeka
- Rollup vs DSpace
- Rollup vs Koha
- Rollup vs SirsiDynix Symphony
- Rollup vs CollectiveAccess
- Rollup vs Ant Design
- Rollup vs Libby
- Rollup vs Hoopla
- Rollup vs Vuetify
- Rollup vs Axiell Collections
- Rollup vs Base UI
- Rollup vs daisyUI
- Rollup vs Ex Libris Alma
- Rollup vs OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- Rollup vs esbuild
- Rollup vs Turbopack
- Rollup vs MySQL
- Rollup vs Docusaurus
- Rollup vs MUI
- Rollup vs Bootstrap
- Rollup vs Radix UI
- Rollup vs shadcn/ui
- Rollup vs Chakra UI
- Rollup vs Apache HTTP Server
- Rollup vs Drupal
- Rollup vs Lit
- Rollup vs .NET
- Rollup vs Express.js
- Rollup vs FastAPI
- Rollup vs NestJS


