Library & Archives · head to head
Evergreen ILS vs Omeka

Evergreen ILS
Library & Archives
Highly scalable open source library software
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Omeka
Library & Archives
Publish collections and create rich digital experiences
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Evergreen ILS server installation is supported only on Debian 10, 11, 12 and 13 and Ubuntu 22.04 and 24.04; Omeka omeka Classic designed for individual projects rather than large institutional deployments
- They diverge on capability: Evergreen ILS covers Circulation management, Omeka covers Item and collection management.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Evergreen ILS and Omeka actually diverge.
| Attribute | Evergreen ILS | Omeka |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Desktop, Api | Web |
| Founded | 2006 | 2007 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Library & Archives).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Evergreen ILS
- Circulation management
- MARC cataloging
- Acquisitions
- Serials management
- OPAC with faceted search
- Patron management
- Offline circulation
- Consortia support
Only in Omeka
- Item and collection management
- Dublin Core metadata
- Online exhibitions
- Plugin architecture
- Theme customization
- Simple workflow
- File management
- Tag and search
Both cover
- Role-based access
- Self-hosted deployment
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Evergreen ILS
- Running a consortium-scale library catalogue and circulation systemnot Omeka
- Self-hosting an open source integrated library system across multiple branchesnot Omeka
Omeka
- Academic and research institutions creating digital collections with Dublin Core metadatanot Evergreen ILS
- Museums and archives publishing heritage collections with semantic web capabilitiesnot Evergreen ILS
- Individual projects and educators creating media-rich online exhibitsnot Evergreen ILS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Evergreen ILS
- Server installation is supported only on Debian 10, 11, 12 and 13 and Ubuntu 22.04 and 24.04
- PostgreSQL 14 is the minimum supported version
- OpenSRF 3.3.0 or later must be installed separately before Evergreen itself
- Installation is a manual multi-service process requiring a dedicated PostgreSQL superuser account and shell access
Omeka
- Omeka Classic designed for individual projects rather than large institutional deployments
- Requires self-hosting and technical setup; no managed hosting option in Classic version
- Omeka S pricing not publicly disclosed, available only for download or sandbox testing
- Limited scalability for institutions managing multiple extensive collections
Pricing, plan by plan
Evergreen ILS
Free- Self-HostedFree
- Full ILS functionality
- Circulation system
- OPAC
- Hosted (via partners)$200/month
- Everything in Self-Hosted
- Managed hosting
- Professional support
Omeka
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Omeka review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Evergreen ILS if
- You need circulation management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Api.
- You also want marc cataloging.
Choose Omeka if
- You need item and collection management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want dublin core metadata.
Questions people ask
- Is Evergreen ILS or Omeka better?
- Neither clearly leads. Evergreen ILS starts at Free and Omeka at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Evergreen ILS or Omeka?
- Evergreen ILS starts at Free and Omeka at Free.
- Does Evergreen ILS or Omeka run on more platforms?
- Evergreen ILS runs on Web, Desktop, Api. Omeka runs on Web.
- Can I use Evergreen ILS for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Evergreen ILS best used for?
- Evergreen ILS is most often used for running a consortium-scale library catalogue and circulation system, self-hosting an open source integrated library system across multiple branches. Of those, running a consortium-scale library catalogue and circulation system and self-hosting an open source integrated library system across multiple branches are not what Omeka is typically brought in for.
- What can Evergreen ILS do that Omeka cannot?
- Evergreen ILS covers Circulation management, MARC cataloging, Acquisitions, Serials management. Omeka covers Item and collection management, Dublin Core metadata, Online exhibitions, Plugin architecture. Both handle Role-based access, Self-hosted deployment, Cloud deployment.
Related pages
More on Evergreen ILS
Other head to heads
- Evergreen ILS vs ArchivesSpace
- Evergreen ILS vs CONTENTdm
- Evergreen ILS vs DSpace
- Evergreen ILS vs VuFind
- Evergreen ILS vs CollectiveAccess
- Evergreen ILS vs Koha
- Evergreen ILS vs Archivematica
- Evergreen ILS vs Axiell Collections
- Evergreen ILS vs Ex Libris Alma
- Evergreen ILS vs FOLIO
- Evergreen ILS vs LibraryThing for Libraries
- Evergreen ILS vs OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- Evergreen ILS vs SirsiDynix Symphony
- Omeka vs ArchivesSpace
- Omeka vs CONTENTdm
- Omeka vs DSpace
- Omeka vs VuFind
- Omeka vs CollectiveAccess
- Omeka vs Koha
- Omeka vs Archivematica
- Omeka vs Axiell Collections
- Omeka vs Ex Libris Alma
- Omeka vs FOLIO
- Omeka vs LibraryThing for Libraries
- Omeka vs OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- Omeka vs SirsiDynix Symphony
