Libraries · head to head
Koha vs Rollup
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Koha no pricing published; Koha is free and open source with no commercial licensing fee; Rollup slower than the Go and Rust bundlers that followed it, since it is written in JavaScript
- They diverge on capability: Koha covers Circulation management, Rollup covers Tree shaking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Koha and Rollup actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Koha
- Circulation management
- MARC21/UNIMARC cataloging
- Acquisitions
- Serials management
- Patron management
- OPAC with faceted search
- Reports and statistics
- Z39.50 support
Only in Rollup
- Tree shaking
- Clean output
- Multiple output formats
- Plugin API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Koha
- Libraries self-hosting an open source integrated library system for cataloging and circulation without vendor licensing feesnot Rollup
Rollup
- Publishing a JavaScript library in several module formatsnot Koha
- Builds where output size and cleanliness matter more than build speednot Koha
- Producing ES module output for consumers who will bundle it themselvesnot Koha
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Koha
- No pricing published; Koha is free and open source with no commercial licensing fee
Rollup
- Slower than the Go and Rust bundlers that followed it, since it is written in JavaScript
- Application concerns like dev servers and hot reloading are not its job, so app builds need Vite on top
- Configuration for non-trivial applications gets verbose compared with tools that assume more
Pricing, plan by plan
Koha
Free- Self-HostedFree
- Full ILS functionality
- Circulation management
- Cataloging (MARC21/UNIMARC)
- Hosted (via partners)$150/month
- Everything in Self-Hosted
- Managed hosting
- Professional support
Rollup
Free- RollupFree
- Full functionality
- Commercial use permitted
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Koha if
- You need circulation management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want marc21/unimarc cataloging.
Choose Rollup if
- You need tree shaking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want clean output.
Questions people ask
- Is Koha or Rollup better?
- Neither clearly leads. Koha starts at Free and Rollup at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Koha or Rollup?
- Koha starts at Free and Rollup at Free.
- Does Koha or Rollup run on more platforms?
- Koha runs on Web, Api. Rollup runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Koha for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Koha best used for?
- Koha is most often used for libraries self-hosting an open source integrated library system for cataloging and circulation without vendor licensing fees. Of those, libraries self-hosting an open source integrated library system for cataloging and circulation without vendor licensing fees is not what Rollup is typically brought in for.
- What can Koha do that Rollup cannot?
- Koha covers Circulation management, MARC21/UNIMARC cataloging, Acquisitions, Serials management. Rollup covers Tree shaking, Clean output, Multiple output formats, Plugin API.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Koha: How much does Koha cost?
Koha is free and open source. There is no software licensing fee. Development is sponsored by libraries, volunteers, and support companies worldwide.
SourceRollup: Is Rollup free?
Yes, open source under the MIT licence.
Koha: Are there paid support options available?
While no specific pricing is detailed on the main site, Koha mentions paid support options available from support companies, but exact costs require contacting providers directly.
SourceRollup: Rollup or webpack?
Rollup is the usual choice for libraries thanks to cleaner output and better tree shaking. webpack remains stronger for complex applications with heavy asset handling.
Rollup: Do I need Rollup if I use Vite?
Not directly. Vite uses Rollup for production builds, so you already benefit from it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Koha vs ArchivesSpace
- Koha vs CONTENTdm
- Koha vs Omeka
- Koha vs DSpace
- Koha vs VuFind
- Koha vs SirsiDynix Symphony
- Koha vs Evergreen ILS
- Koha vs Axiell Collections
- Koha vs Libby
- Koha vs CollectiveAccess
- Koha vs Hoopla
- Koha vs Vuetify
- Koha vs Base UI
- Koha vs daisyUI
- Koha vs Ex Libris Alma
- Koha vs FOLIO
- Koha vs OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- Koha vs esbuild
- Koha vs Turbopack
- Koha vs MySQL
- Koha vs Docusaurus
- Koha vs MUI
- Koha vs Bootstrap
- Koha vs Radix UI
- Koha vs shadcn/ui
- Koha vs Chakra UI
- Koha vs Apache HTTP Server
- Koha vs Drupal
- Koha vs Lit
- Koha vs .NET
- Koha vs Express.js
- Koha vs FastAPI
- Koha vs NestJS
- Rollup vs ArchivesSpace
- Rollup vs CONTENTdm
- Rollup vs Omeka
- Rollup vs DSpace
- Rollup vs VuFind
- Rollup vs SirsiDynix Symphony
- Rollup vs Evergreen ILS
- Rollup vs Axiell Collections
- Rollup vs Libby
- Rollup vs CollectiveAccess
- Rollup vs Hoopla
- Rollup vs Vuetify
- Rollup vs Base UI
- Rollup vs daisyUI
- Rollup vs Ex Libris Alma
- Rollup vs FOLIO
- Rollup vs OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- Rollup vs esbuild
- Rollup vs Turbopack
- Rollup vs MySQL
- Rollup vs Docusaurus
- Rollup vs MUI
- Rollup vs Bootstrap
- Rollup vs Radix UI
- Rollup vs shadcn/ui
- Rollup vs Chakra UI
- Rollup vs Apache HTTP Server
- Rollup vs Drupal
- Rollup vs Lit
- Rollup vs .NET
- Rollup vs Express.js
- Rollup vs FastAPI
- Rollup vs NestJS


