ERP · head to head
Epicor vs Levelpath

Epicor
ERP
A portfolio of separately acquired ERP products, not one system
- From
- $750/month
- Rated
- -

Levelpath
ERP
AI-native procurement built around intake, from the founders who previously built Scout RFP
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Epicor epicor is a portfolio of separately acquired products rather than one system, so reviews, references and analyst coverage about Epicor as a brand can be misleading about the specific product you are being sold.; Levelpath it is a young platform competing with suites that have two decades of accumulated edge cases, and gaps tend to appear in tax handling, direct materials and unusual ERP configurations.
- They diverge on capability: Epicor covers Kinetic, Levelpath covers Conversational intake.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Epicor and Levelpath actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (ERP).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Epicor
- Kinetic
- Prophet 21
- Eclipse
- BisTrack
- Cloud deployment
- Extensibility tooling
- Manufacturing execution
- Industry compliance
Only in Levelpath
- Conversational intake
- AI agents
- Sourcing events
- Contract management
- Supplier risk
- Mobile first
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Epicor
- A discrete manufacturer moving off spreadsheets and an accounting package onto a system that models routings and job costsnot Levelpath
- A wholesale distributor whose pricing, rebate and purchasing rules exceed what a general ERP handles without customisationnot Levelpath
- An electrical or plumbing distributor needing counter sales and trade-specific workflow out of the boxnot Levelpath
- A building materials dealer needing yard operations, delivery scheduling and configured product ordering in one systemnot Levelpath
Levelpath
- A company where employees bypass the procurement system entirely and spend under management has stallednot Epicor
- Replacing an enterprise suite whose rollout took two years and still has low requisition adoptionnot Epicor
- A finance team wanting every purchase request routed through policy without hiring more procurement staffnot Epicor
- A mid-market company implementing procurement software for the first time and unwilling to fund a systems integratornot Epicor
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Epicor
- Epicor is a portfolio of separately acquired products rather than one system, so reviews, references and analyst coverage about Epicor as a brand can be misleading about the specific product you are being sold.
- The products are highly customisable and are routinely customised, and heavily customised installations become expensive to upgrade, which is why long-standing customers frequently run versions several releases behind current.
- Cloud delivery is single-tenant hosting rather than multi-tenant SaaS, so you still own an upgrade decision and the regression testing that comes with it, and buyers who expected the SaaS model of no upgrades are surprised.
- Sales and delivery run through a mix of direct staff and partners depending on product and region, so accountability for a failed implementation can be genuinely ambiguous unless it is fixed in the contract before signature.
- The strongest coverage is in North American manufacturing and distribution, so an international group needing statutory compliance and local support across many countries has to test that coverage carefully rather than assume it.
Levelpath
- It is a young platform competing with suites that have two decades of accumulated edge cases, and gaps tend to appear in tax handling, direct materials and unusual ERP configurations.
- No pricing is published at any tier, so buyers cannot judge whether the AI-native positioning carries a premium over established competitors.
- AI agents that classify and route requests are only as good as the policy configuration behind them, and a company with ambiguous procurement policy gets ambiguous automation.
- Venture funding at this scale implies growth expectations, which historically produces price increases at renewal once a customer base is captured.
- The intake-first design assumes procurement problems are adoption problems, which is not true for organisations whose real issue is category strategy or supplier consolidation.
Pricing, plan by plan
Epicor
$750/month- Starter$750/month
- Core ERP
- Manufacturing
- Financial management
- Professional$1500/month
- Advanced ERP
- Advanced CRM
- Analytics
Levelpath
On request- Levelpath$undefined/year
- Intake, sourcing, contracts and supplier management
- Priced by company size and modules, quoted directly
- AI agent capability included rather than sold as an add-on
Which should you pick?
Choose Epicor if
- You need kinetic.
- You work on Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid.
- You also want prophet 21.
Choose Levelpath if
- You need conversational intake.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want ai agents.
Questions people ask
- Is Epicor or Levelpath better?
- Neither clearly leads. Epicor starts at $750/month and Levelpath at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Epicor or Levelpath?
- Epicor starts at $750/month and Levelpath at On request.
- Does Epicor or Levelpath run on more platforms?
- Epicor runs on Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid. Levelpath runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Epicor best used for?
- Epicor is most often used for a discrete manufacturer moving off spreadsheets and an accounting package onto a system that models routings and job costs, a wholesale distributor whose pricing, rebate and purchasing rules exceed what a general erp handles without customisation, an electrical or plumbing distributor needing counter sales and trade-specific workflow out of the box, a building materials dealer needing yard operations, delivery scheduling and configured product ordering in one system. Of those, a discrete manufacturer moving off spreadsheets and an accounting package onto a system that models routings and job costs and a wholesale distributor whose pricing, rebate and purchasing rules exceed what a general erp handles without customisation are not what Levelpath is typically brought in for.
- What can Epicor do that Levelpath cannot?
- Epicor covers Kinetic, Prophet 21, Eclipse, BisTrack. Levelpath covers Conversational intake, AI agents, Sourcing events, Contract management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Epicor: Which Epicor product am I actually being sold?
Ask explicitly, by name. Kinetic, Prophet 21, Eclipse and BisTrack are different systems with different roadmaps. Then ask for references on that specific product, in your industry, at your size.
Levelpath: Who is behind Levelpath?
Stan Garber and Alex Yakubovich, who previously founded Scout RFP and sold it to Workday.
Epicor: Is Epicor Kinetic a true SaaS product?
It is delivered as a hosted single-tenant service on Azure. You get vendor-managed infrastructure, but you do not get the multi-tenant model where the vendor upgrades everyone at once and no upgrade project exists.
Levelpath: Is pricing published?
No. Pricing is quoted by company size and module selection.
Epicor: How much should I customise?
Less than you will want to. Every modification is something to retest and potentially rework at each upgrade, and the accumulation of them is the main reason customers get stranded on old versions. Push hard on whether a requirement is genuinely a differentiator before building for it.
Levelpath: How long is implementation?
Levelpath positions implementation in weeks rather than the quarters typical of enterprise source-to-pay, which is the main practical claim to test in a reference call.
Epicor: Direct or partner implementation?
Both exist. The partner's track record on your product and industry matters more than the vendor's, so ask who will staff the project, request their references, and put named staff into the statement of work.
Levelpath: Does it handle direct materials?
It is built primarily for indirect spend. Manufacturers with bill of materials sourcing should look at established direct-capable suites.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Epicor vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- Epicor vs Infor CloudSuite
- Epicor vs Rootstock
- Epicor vs DEAR Systems
- Epicor vs Fishbowl
- Epicor vs MRPeasy
- Epicor vs NetSuite
- Epicor vs Metasfresh
- Epicor vs GEP SMART
- Epicor vs iDempiere
- Epicor vs Plex Manufacturing Cloud
- Epicor vs TallyPrime
- Epicor vs TeamSystem
- Epicor vs TOTVS
- Epicor vs Tryton
- Epicor vs Tyler Enterprise ERP (Munis)
- Epicor vs Unanet
- Epicor vs QAD ERP
- Epicor vs Ivalua
- Epicor vs Jaggaer
- Epicor vs Omnea
- Epicor vs Zip
- Epicor vs Zycus
- Epicor vs IFS Cloud
- Epicor vs IQMS
- Epicor vs Sage X3
- Epicor vs SYSPRO
- Epicor vs Icertis
- Epicor vs Global Shop Solutions
- Epicor vs Infor
- Epicor vs Java
- Levelpath vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- Levelpath vs Infor CloudSuite
- Levelpath vs Rootstock
- Levelpath vs DEAR Systems
- Levelpath vs Fishbowl
- Levelpath vs MRPeasy
- Levelpath vs NetSuite
- Levelpath vs Metasfresh
- Levelpath vs GEP SMART
- Levelpath vs iDempiere
- Levelpath vs Plex Manufacturing Cloud
- Levelpath vs TallyPrime
- Levelpath vs TeamSystem
- Levelpath vs TOTVS
- Levelpath vs Tryton
- Levelpath vs Tyler Enterprise ERP (Munis)
- Levelpath vs Unanet
- Levelpath vs QAD ERP
- Levelpath vs Ivalua
- Levelpath vs Jaggaer
- Levelpath vs Omnea
- Levelpath vs Zip
- Levelpath vs Zycus
- Levelpath vs IFS Cloud
- Levelpath vs IQMS
- Levelpath vs Sage X3
- Levelpath vs SYSPRO
- Levelpath vs Icertis
- Levelpath vs Global Shop Solutions
- Levelpath vs Infor
- Levelpath vs Java
