Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs Sticky Password

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sticky Password
Cybersecurity
Password manager with autofill, digital wallet, and dark web monitoring
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Sticky Password has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; Sticky Password offers no dedicated family plan, requiring individual licenses or a Teams plan to cover a household.
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Sticky Password covers Autofill and capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and Sticky Password actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | Sticky Password |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Api | web, ios, android, windows, mac |
| Founded | 1911 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in Sticky Password
- Autofill and capture
- Encrypted vault sync
- Emergency access
- Dark web monitoring
- Password sharing
- Digital wallet
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Sticky Password
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Sticky Password
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Sticky Password
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Sticky Password
Sticky Password
- Storing and autofilling passwords across devicesnot IBM QRadar
- Securely sharing a login with a family member or colleaguenot IBM QRadar
- Granting emergency vault access to a trusted contactnot IBM QRadar
- Monitoring saved credentials for dark web exposurenot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Sticky Password
- Offers no dedicated family plan, requiring individual licenses or a Teams plan to cover a household.
- Free tier is limited to a 30-day Premium trial rather than a permanent free feature set.
- Lacks the browser-based item history and detailed sharing permissions offered by some larger competitors.
- Business/Teams tooling is lighter than dedicated enterprise password managers with SSO and SCIM support.
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Sticky Password
Free- Free (30-day Premium trial)Free
- 30-day trial of Premium features
- Basic password storage after trial
- Premium$2.5/month
- Vault sync across devices
- Password sharing
- Dark web monitoring
- Teams$2.5/month
- Per-user pricing billed annually
- Usable for families or businesses
- Centralized license management
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose Sticky Password if
- You need autofill and capture.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, ios, android, windows, mac.
- You also want encrypted vault sync.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or Sticky Password better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and Sticky Password at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or Sticky Password?
- Sticky Password has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for IBM QRadar and Free for Sticky Password.
- Does IBM QRadar or Sticky Password run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. Sticky Password runs on web, ios, android, windows, mac.
- Can I use Sticky Password for free?
- Yes. Sticky Password has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IBM QRadar starts at On request.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what Sticky Password is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that Sticky Password cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. Sticky Password covers Autofill and capture, Encrypted vault sync, Emergency access, Dark web monitoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
IBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
IBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
More on Sticky Password
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Enpass
- IBM QRadar vs Keeper Password Manager
- IBM QRadar vs HashiCorp Vault
- IBM QRadar vs Bitwarden
- IBM QRadar vs Kaspersky Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs Akeyless
- IBM QRadar vs Doppler
- IBM QRadar vs Passbolt
- IBM QRadar vs Frontegg
- IBM QRadar vs Milestone XProtect
- IBM QRadar vs Osano
- IBM QRadar vs Proton Mail
- IBM QRadar vs Veriff
- IBM QRadar vs Brave Browser
- IBM QRadar vs March Networks
- Sticky Password vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Sticky Password vs 1Password
- Sticky Password vs Norton 360
- Sticky Password vs LastPass
- Sticky Password vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Sticky Password vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Sticky Password vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Sticky Password vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Sticky Password vs Recorded Future
- Sticky Password vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Sticky Password vs Proofpoint
- Sticky Password vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Sticky Password vs Arnica
- Sticky Password vs Authelia
- Sticky Password vs Authy
- Sticky Password vs Baffle
- Sticky Password vs Beyond Identity
- Sticky Password vs BeyondTrust
- Sticky Password vs Enpass
- Sticky Password vs Keeper Password Manager
- Sticky Password vs HashiCorp Vault
- Sticky Password vs Bitwarden
- Sticky Password vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Sticky Password vs Akeyless
- Sticky Password vs Doppler
- Sticky Password vs Passbolt
- Sticky Password vs Frontegg
- Sticky Password vs Milestone XProtect
- Sticky Password vs Osano
- Sticky Password vs Proton Mail
- Sticky Password vs Veriff
- Sticky Password vs Brave Browser
- Sticky Password vs March Networks
