Cybersecurity · head to head
Endor Labs vs Stytch

Endor Labs
Cybersecurity
Security and AI agent governance for code and supply chain
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Stytch
Cybersecurity
Identity platform with passwordless auth, passkeys and bot detection.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Endor Labs pricing requires contacting sales, no transparent rates; Stytch free tier limited to 10,000 monthly active users; scaling beyond this requires custom pricing negotiation
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Endor Labs and Stytch actually diverge.
| Attribute | Endor Labs | Stytch |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Seat-based per contributing developer with volume discounts | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, CLI, IDE | Web, API |
| Founded | 2021 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Endor Labs
- AI coding agent governance
- SAST scanning
- Secrets detection
- Reachability analysis
- Open source dependency scanning
- Package firewall
- MCP server integration
Only in Stytch
Nothing recorded that Endor Labs does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Endor Labs
- Securing AI coding agent outputs before deploymentnot Stytch
- Reducing SAST false positives with reachability analysisnot Stytch
- Managing open source supply chain risknot Stytch
- Enforcing security policies in CI/CD pipelinesnot Stytch
Stytch
- Applications prioritising passwordless and passkey authenticationnot Endor Labs
- SaaS platforms requiring AI agent authentication and machine-to-machine flowsnot Endor Labs
- Companies with emerging identity needs such as bot detection and device intelligencenot Endor Labs
- Organisations building with Next.js and React requiring modern auth patternsnot Endor Labs
- Applications needing transparent pricing without surprise tiers or feature gatingnot Endor Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Endor Labs
- Pricing requires contacting sales, no transparent rates
- Developer tier lacks UI and historical scan data
- Free tier limited to local scanning only
- Seat-based model may become expensive for large teams
Stytch
- Free tier limited to 10,000 monthly active users; scaling beyond this requires custom pricing negotiation
- Fraud prevention capabilities billed at $0.005 per fingerprint for usage exceeding 10,000 free checks
- Additional SSO or SCIM connections beyond the 5 included in free tier cost $125 each
- Brand customisation and email removal require one-time payment of $99
- HIPAA and advanced fraud protection only available in Enterprise tier
- No native UI builder; requires custom frontend development for fully-branded auth flows
Pricing, plan by plan
Endor Labs
Free- DeveloperFree
- Local scanning
- Read-only vulnerability data
- No UI, policies, or scan history
Stytch
Free- FreeFree
- 10,000 monthly active users and AI agents
- Unlimited organisations
- 5 SSO or SCIM connections
- Scaled$undefined/variable
- Usage-based pricing for users exceeding 10,000
- All free tier features
- Volume discounts available
- Enterprise$undefined/variable
- Custom pricing
- Discounted volume rates
- Enterprise support SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Endor Labs if
- You need ai coding agent governance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, IDE.
- You also want sast scanning.
Questions people ask
- Is Endor Labs or Stytch better?
- Neither clearly leads. Endor Labs starts at Free and Stytch at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Endor Labs or Stytch?
- Endor Labs starts at Free and Stytch at Free.
- Does Endor Labs or Stytch run on more platforms?
- Endor Labs runs on Web, CLI, IDE. Stytch runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Endor Labs for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Endor Labs best used for?
- Endor Labs is most often used for securing ai coding agent outputs before deployment, reducing sast false positives with reachability analysis, managing open source supply chain risk, enforcing security policies in ci/cd pipelines. Of those, securing ai coding agent outputs before deployment and reducing sast false positives with reachability analysis are not what Stytch is typically brought in for.
- What can Endor Labs do that Stytch cannot?
- Endor Labs covers AI coding agent governance, SAST scanning, Secrets detection, Reachability analysis.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Endor Labs: What is the difference between Endor Labs Developer and paid tiers?
Developer tier is free and provides local scanning via MCP server with read-only vulnerability access and no UI. Paid tiers (Core and Pro) add team features like policy enforcement, enterprise integrations, reporting, and scan history.
SourceStytch: What is included in Stytch's free tier?
The free tier includes 10,000 monthly active users (human and AI agents), unlimited organisations, 5 SSO or SCIM connections, and 1,000 machine-to-machine tokens with full authentication features.
SourceEndor Labs: How does Endor Labs define seats for pricing?
Seats are calculated per contributing developer (those with commits in monitored repositories within the last 90 days). Volume discounts apply as team size grows.
SourceStytch: Does Stytch support AI agent authentication?
Yes. Stytch provides native AI agent authentication and authorisation, with support for the Model Context Protocol (MCP) for authenticating AI agents accessing external systems.
SourceEndor Labs: Does Endor Labs support on-premises deployment?
The platform is cloud-based SaaS by default. Enterprise customers should contact sales to discuss custom deployment options.
SourceStytch: What fraud prevention features does Stytch offer?
Stytch includes bot detection with 99.99% accuracy, device fingerprinting, invisible CAPTCHA, and zero-day device intelligence built into all tiers.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Endor Labs vs Snyk
- Endor Labs vs Socket
- Endor Labs vs Chainguard
- Endor Labs vs Akeyless
- Endor Labs vs Doppler
- Endor Labs vs Arnica
- Endor Labs vs Infisical
- Endor Labs vs Veracode
- Endor Labs vs Speakeasy
- Endor Labs vs Tenable
- Endor Labs vs HashiCorp Vault
- Endor Labs vs Transcend
- Endor Labs vs Windscribe
- Endor Labs vs Yoti
- Endor Labs vs authentik
- Endor Labs vs Avast One
- Endor Labs vs Cosign
- Endor Labs vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Endor Labs vs 1Password
- Endor Labs vs Norton 360
- Endor Labs vs LastPass
- Endor Labs vs Cisco Duo
- Endor Labs vs Transmit Security
- Endor Labs vs Descope
- Endor Labs vs Authy
- Endor Labs vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Endor Labs vs VMware Carbon Black
- Endor Labs vs Feedzai
- Endor Labs vs NICE Actimize
- Endor Labs vs Salient CompleteView
- Endor Labs vs Sumsub
- Endor Labs vs Tuta
- Endor Labs vs Camio
- Endor Labs vs Clerk
- Stytch vs Snyk
- Stytch vs Socket
- Stytch vs Chainguard
- Stytch vs Akeyless
- Stytch vs Doppler
- Stytch vs Arnica
- Stytch vs Infisical
- Stytch vs Veracode
- Stytch vs Speakeasy
- Stytch vs Tenable
- Stytch vs HashiCorp Vault
- Stytch vs Transcend
- Stytch vs Windscribe
- Stytch vs Yoti
- Stytch vs authentik
- Stytch vs Avast One
- Stytch vs Cosign
- Stytch vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Stytch vs 1Password
- Stytch vs Norton 360
- Stytch vs LastPass
- Stytch vs Cisco Duo
- Stytch vs Transmit Security
- Stytch vs Descope
- Stytch vs Authy
- Stytch vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Stytch vs VMware Carbon Black
- Stytch vs Feedzai
- Stytch vs NICE Actimize
- Stytch vs Salient CompleteView
- Stytch vs Sumsub
- Stytch vs Tuta
- Stytch vs Camio
- Stytch vs Clerk
