Databases · head to head
EMQX vs Postman

EMQX
Databases
Erlang MQTT broker for large IoT fleets, relicensed to BSL with production free use limited to one node
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Postman
Developer Tools
The API platform for building and using APIs
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Postman is an API platform for building and using APIs.
- Free plans on both; paid from $234/mo and $14/mo.
- Only EMQX lists erlang clustering; only Postman lists API client.
- Where Postman falls short: free plan limited to single user as of March 1, 2026, making it unsuitable for teams without paid plans.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which EMQX and Postman actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: pricing model for Postman, founded for EMQX.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in EMQX
- Erlang clustering
- MQTT 5.0 and QUIC
- Rule engine
- Data integration sinks
- Session persistence
- Multi protocol gateways
- Authentication and authorisation
- Dashboard and REST API
Only in Postman
- API client
- Automated testing
- Mock servers
- Documentation
- Monitors
- Workspaces
- Version control
- API design
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
EMQX
- A connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent MQTT sessions with QUIC for handover across mobile networksnot Postman
- An industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into TimescaleDB or Kafka without writing a consumer servicenot Postman
- An IoT product team that has outgrown a single Mosquitto instance and needs clustering and shared subscriptionsnot Postman
- A smart building deployment mixing MQTT, CoAP and LwM2M devices on one brokernot Postman
Postman
- API testingnot EMQX
- API documentationnot EMQX
- API monitoringnot EMQX
- Team collaborationnot EMQX
- API developmentnot EMQX
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
EMQX
- The move to Business Source Licence 1.1 at version 5.9 in May 2025 limits free production use to a single node, so the clustering that justifies choosing EMQX now requires a paid subscription from the second node onward
- The relicensing arrived in a minor release, which caught users who had pinned to 5.x expecting Apache 2.0 terms and forced legal review of existing deployments
- Running an Erlang/OTP cluster well requires operational knowledge most teams do not have, and diagnosing distribution, mnesia or memory issues means learning a runtime you use for nothing else
- Enterprise pricing is quoted rather than published for the self-managed edition, so the cost of the clustered configuration you actually need is invisible until you talk to sales
- The Serverless tier caps at around a thousand connections and shares infrastructure, which makes it a prototyping tier rather than a genuine small production option
Postman
- Free plan limited to single user as of March 1, 2026, making it unsuitable for teams without paid plans
- Only 25 collection runs per month and 1,000 API calls/month on free tier
- Removed local-only Scratch Pad mode in 2023, forcing cloud account creation and sync
- Requires Postman account and internet connection for most features
- Cloud-first architecture with mandatory syncing to Postman's cloud servers
- No CI/CD integration or advanced security features on free plan
Pricing, plan by plan
EMQX
Free- Open Source single nodeFree
- BSL 1.1 licence since version 5.9
- Free production use of one node only
- All former enterprise features visible
- ServerlessFree
- Free monthly quota then pay as you go
- Up to 1,000 connections
- 8 by 5 support
- Dedicated Flex$234/mo
- Single tenant cluster
- Traffic allowance included
- 24/7 support
- Enterprise self-managedOn request
- Deploy on premises, at the edge or in any cloud
- Clustering licensed
- 256 MB maximum message size
Postman
Free- FreeFree
- 1 user
- 25 collection runs/month
- 1,000 API calls/month
- Team$14/mo
- Team collaboration
- Shared workspaces
- API mocking
- Professional$29/mo
- Team features
- Advanced security
- SSO
- Enterprise$49/mo
- Professional features
- Custom integrations
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose EMQX if
- You need erlang clustering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Self-hosted, Web, macOS.
- You also want mqtt 5.0 and quic.
Choose Postman if
- You need api client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want automated testing.
Questions people ask
- Is EMQX or Postman better?
- Neither clearly leads. EMQX starts at Free and Postman at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, EMQX or Postman?
- EMQX starts at Free and Postman at Free.
- Does EMQX or Postman run on more platforms?
- EMQX runs on Linux, Self-hosted, Web, macOS. Postman runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use EMQX for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is EMQX best used for?
- EMQX is most often used for a connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent mqtt sessions with quic for handover across mobile networks, an industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into timescaledb or kafka without writing a consumer service, an iot product team that has outgrown a single mosquitto instance and needs clustering and shared subscriptions, a smart building deployment mixing mqtt, coap and lwm2m devices on one broker. Of those, a connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent mqtt sessions with quic for handover across mobile networks and an industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into timescaledb or kafka without writing a consumer service are not what Postman is typically brought in for.
- What can EMQX do that Postman cannot?
- EMQX covers Erlang clustering, MQTT 5.0 and QUIC, Rule engine, Data integration sinks. Postman covers API client, Automated testing, Mock servers, Documentation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
EMQX: Is EMQX still open source?
Not in the OSI sense since version 5.9. It is source-available under Business Source Licence 1.1, reverting to Apache 2.0 four years after each release.
Postman: What is the cost of Postman?
Postman has a free plan limited to 1 user, 25 collection runs/month, 1,000 API calls/month. Team plans start at $14/user/month for Basic. Professional at $29/user/month, and Enterprise at $49/user/month.
SourceEMQX: Can I run a free cluster?
No. The additional use grant permits free production use of one node; clustering requires a commercial licence.
Postman: Can I use Postman offline?
Postman requires an internet connection to sync collections to the cloud. Since 2023, the Scratch Pad local-only mode was removed. Users must sign in with a Postman account, and collections sync to cloud by default. Offline work is possible but limited without cloud sync features.
SourceEMQX: What changed for existing users?
Community and enterprise editions merged, so all features are now visible, but the licence terms tightened in the same minor release.
Postman: Does Postman have team collaboration?
Team collaboration is not available on the free plan (limited to 1 user). Team plans start at $14/user/month and include shared workspaces, real-time collaboration, and team management features.
SourceEMQX: Which version is still Apache 2.0?
Releases before 5.9 remain under Apache 2.0, and each BSL release converts to Apache 2.0 four years after publication.
Postman: What are the free plan limits?
Free plan allows: 1 user only, 25 collection runs per month, 1,000 API calls/month, and 1,000 mock server calls/month. No CI/CD integration or advanced security features.
SourcePostman: Does Postman work with other development tools?
Postman integrates with Git repositories, offers a Node.js runner (Newman) for automation, and connects with popular CI/CD platforms. Teams using git-native workflows may prefer alternatives like Bruno.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- EMQX vs VerneMQ
- EMQX vs RabbitMQ
- EMQX vs NATS
- EMQX vs Solace PubSub+
- EMQX vs Canary Labs
- EMQX vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- EMQX vs TimescaleDB
- EMQX vs Turso
- EMQX vs Chroma
- EMQX vs Redis
- EMQX vs DuckDB
- EMQX vs Trino
- EMQX vs Xata
- EMQX vs YugabyteDB
- EMQX vs Zilliz
- EMQX vs Airtable
- EMQX vs Cockroach Labs
- EMQX vs PostgreSQL
- EMQX vs Swagger UI
- EMQX vs Storybook
- EMQX vs GitHub
- EMQX vs PyCharm
- EMQX vs Eclipse
- EMQX vs Garden
- EMQX vs Steampipe
- EMQX vs RAD Studio
- EMQX vs GitLab
- EMQX vs Atlantis
- EMQX vs StackBlitz
- EMQX vs Helm
- EMQX vs Jenkins
- EMQX vs Jitsu
- EMQX vs Notepad++
- EMQX vs Prettier
- EMQX vs Rust
- EMQX vs GitHub Desktop
- Postman vs VerneMQ
- Postman vs RabbitMQ
- Postman vs NATS
- Postman vs Solace PubSub+
- Postman vs Canary Labs
- Postman vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Postman vs TimescaleDB
- Postman vs Turso
- Postman vs Chroma
- Postman vs Redis
- Postman vs DuckDB
- Postman vs Trino
- Postman vs Xata
- Postman vs YugabyteDB
- Postman vs Zilliz
- Postman vs Airtable
- Postman vs Cockroach Labs
- Postman vs PostgreSQL
- Postman vs Swagger UI
- Postman vs Storybook
- Postman vs GitHub
- Postman vs PyCharm
- Postman vs Eclipse
- Postman vs Garden
- Postman vs Steampipe
- Postman vs RAD Studio
- Postman vs GitLab
- Postman vs Atlantis
- Postman vs StackBlitz
- Postman vs Helm
- Postman vs Jenkins
- Postman vs Jitsu
- Postman vs Notepad++
- Postman vs Prettier
- Postman vs Rust
- Postman vs GitHub Desktop
