Databases · head to head
EMQX vs Fivetran HVR

EMQX
Databases
Erlang MQTT broker for large IoT fleets, relicensed to BSL with production free use limited to one node
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Fivetran HVR
Databases
Log-based change data capture for database replication and synchronization
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only EMQX has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: EMQX the move to Business Source Licence 1.1 at version 5.9 in May 2025 limits free production use to a single node, so the clustering that justifies choosing EMQX now requires a paid subscription from the second node onward.; Fivetran HVR pricing not published separately; part of Fivetran's usage model
- They diverge on capability: EMQX covers Erlang clustering, Fivetran HVR covers Log-based change capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which EMQX and Fivetran HVR actually diverge.
| Attribute | EMQX | Fivetran HVR |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per month by connection and session volume | Usage-based, integrated with Fivetran billing |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS | Data Warehouse, Data Lake, Operational Databases |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in EMQX
- Erlang clustering
- MQTT 5.0 and QUIC
- Rule engine
- Data integration sinks
- Session persistence
- Multi protocol gateways
- Authentication and authorisation
- Dashboard and REST API
Only in Fivetran HVR
- Log-based change capture
- Real-time replication
- Schema evolution handling
- Multi-table consistency
- Zero-impact monitoring
- Fivetran integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
EMQX
- A connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent MQTT sessions with QUIC for handover across mobile networksnot Fivetran HVR
- An industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into TimescaleDB or Kafka without writing a consumer servicenot Fivetran HVR
- An IoT product team that has outgrown a single Mosquitto instance and needs clustering and shared subscriptionsnot Fivetran HVR
- A smart building deployment mixing MQTT, CoAP and LwM2M devices on one brokernot Fivetran HVR
Fivetran HVR
- Real-time database replication to data warehousesnot EMQX
- Maintaining operational copies for analyticsnot EMQX
- Disaster recovery and business continuitynot EMQX
- Feeding AI systems with fresh governed datanot EMQX
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
EMQX
- The move to Business Source Licence 1.1 at version 5.9 in May 2025 limits free production use to a single node, so the clustering that justifies choosing EMQX now requires a paid subscription from the second node onward.
- The relicensing arrived in a minor release, which caught users who had pinned to 5.x expecting Apache 2.0 terms and forced legal review of existing deployments.
- Running an Erlang/OTP cluster well requires operational knowledge most teams do not have, and diagnosing distribution, mnesia or memory issues means learning a runtime you use for nothing else.
- Enterprise pricing is quoted rather than published for the self-managed edition, so the cost of the clustered configuration you actually need is invisible until you talk to sales.
- The Serverless tier caps at around a thousand connections and shares infrastructure, which makes it a prototyping tier rather than a genuine small production option.
Fivetran HVR
- Pricing not published separately; part of Fivetran's usage model
- Requires Fivetran relationship for implementation
- Limited standalone documentation and community resources
- May be overkill for simple batch replication needs
- Competitive offerings provide more transparent per-connector pricing
Pricing, plan by plan
EMQX
Free- Open Source single nodeFree
- BSL 1.1 licence since version 5.9
- Free production use of one node only
- All former enterprise features visible
- ServerlessFree
- Free monthly quota then pay as you go
- Up to 1,000 connections
- 8 by 5 support
- Dedicated Flex$234/month
- Single tenant cluster
- Traffic allowance included
- 24/7 support
- Enterprise self-managed$undefined/year
- Deploy on premises, at the edge or in any cloud
- Clustering licensed
- 256 MB maximum message size
Fivetran HVR
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Fivetran HVR review.
Which should you pick?
Choose EMQX if
- You need erlang clustering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS.
- You also want mqtt 5.0 and quic.
Choose Fivetran HVR if
- You need log-based change capture.
- You work on Data Warehouse, Data Lake, Operational Databases.
- You also want real-time replication.
Questions people ask
- Is EMQX or Fivetran HVR better?
- Neither clearly leads. EMQX starts at Free and Fivetran HVR at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, EMQX or Fivetran HVR?
- EMQX has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for EMQX and On request for Fivetran HVR.
- Does EMQX or Fivetran HVR run on more platforms?
- EMQX runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS. Fivetran HVR runs on Data Warehouse, Data Lake, Operational Databases.
- Can I use EMQX for free?
- Yes. EMQX has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Fivetran HVR starts at On request.
- What is EMQX best used for?
- EMQX is most often used for a connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent mqtt sessions with quic for handover across mobile networks, an industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into timescaledb or kafka without writing a consumer service, an iot product team that has outgrown a single mosquitto instance and needs clustering and shared subscriptions, a smart building deployment mixing mqtt, coap and lwm2m devices on one broker. Of those, a connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent mqtt sessions with quic for handover across mobile networks and an industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into timescaledb or kafka without writing a consumer service are not what Fivetran HVR is typically brought in for.
- What can EMQX do that Fivetran HVR cannot?
- EMQX covers Erlang clustering, MQTT 5.0 and QUIC, Rule engine, Data integration sinks. Fivetran HVR covers Log-based change capture, Real-time replication, Schema evolution handling, Multi-table consistency.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
EMQX: Is EMQX still open source?
Not in the OSI sense since version 5.9. It is source-available under Business Source Licence 1.1, reverting to Apache 2.0 four years after each release.
Fivetran HVR: What databases does Fivetran HVR support?
HVR supports major databases including Oracle, SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, and others that emit transaction logs.
SourceEMQX: Can I run a free cluster?
No. The additional use grant permits free production use of one node; clustering requires a commercial licence.
Fivetran HVR: Is HVR part of standard Fivetran pricing?
Yes, HVR is integrated into Fivetran's usage-based pricing model with standard per-row-synced and transformation costs.
SourceEMQX: What changed for existing users?
Community and enterprise editions merged, so all features are now visible, but the licence terms tightened in the same minor release.
EMQX: Which version is still Apache 2.0?
Releases before 5.9 remain under Apache 2.0, and each BSL release converts to Apache 2.0 four years after publication.
Related pages
More on Fivetran HVR
Other head to heads
- EMQX vs VerneMQ
- EMQX vs RabbitMQ
- EMQX vs NATS
- EMQX vs Solace PubSub+
- EMQX vs Canary Labs
- EMQX vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- EMQX vs TimescaleDB
- EMQX vs Turso
- EMQX vs Chroma
- EMQX vs DuckDB
- EMQX vs Teradata
- EMQX vs Apache Kafka
- EMQX vs Immuta
- EMQX vs MariaDB
- EMQX vs Materialize
- EMQX vs Oracle Database
- EMQX vs Estuary
- EMQX vs Apache Druid
- EMQX vs SingleStore
- EMQX vs ClickHouse
- EMQX vs Firebase Realtime Database
- EMQX vs ScyllaDB
- EMQX vs SQLite
- EMQX vs StarRocks
- EMQX vs SurrealDB
- EMQX vs Apache Pinot
- EMQX vs Apache Flink
- EMQX vs Apache Pulsar
- EMQX vs CouchDB
- Fivetran HVR vs VerneMQ
- Fivetran HVR vs RabbitMQ
- Fivetran HVR vs NATS
- Fivetran HVR vs Solace PubSub+
- Fivetran HVR vs Canary Labs
- Fivetran HVR vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Fivetran HVR vs TimescaleDB
- Fivetran HVR vs Turso
- Fivetran HVR vs Chroma
- Fivetran HVR vs DuckDB
- Fivetran HVR vs Teradata
- Fivetran HVR vs Apache Kafka
- Fivetran HVR vs Immuta
- Fivetran HVR vs MariaDB
- Fivetran HVR vs Materialize
- Fivetran HVR vs Oracle Database
- Fivetran HVR vs Estuary
- Fivetran HVR vs Apache Druid
- Fivetran HVR vs SingleStore
- Fivetran HVR vs ClickHouse
- Fivetran HVR vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Fivetran HVR vs ScyllaDB
- Fivetran HVR vs SQLite
- Fivetran HVR vs StarRocks
- Fivetran HVR vs SurrealDB
- Fivetran HVR vs Apache Pinot
- Fivetran HVR vs Apache Flink
- Fivetran HVR vs Apache Pulsar
- Fivetran HVR vs CouchDB
